Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇦🇹Festung Österreich🇦🇹

Channel

🇦🇹Festung Österreich🇦🇹

@fpoeinfo

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

17,521subscribers

-470 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001383032105
TypeChannel
Username@fpoeinfo
Created3 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fpoeinfo

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 157 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fpoeinfo/2507 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/111624 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC1.002.6 hours
@fpoeinfo/2510 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/111686 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC1.0012 hours
@fpoeinfo/2514 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/1117310 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC1.0036 minutes
@fpoeinfo/2520 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/1120211 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC1.0014 minutes
@fpoeinfo/2536 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/1127918 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC1.0037 minutes
@fpoeinfo/2545 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC@Tom_Lausen1/1131722 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC1.001.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Tom_Lausen124 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutesthis entry (24–0)
@jenslehrich114 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.3 hoursthis entry (14–0)
@HKickl9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 minutesthis entry (6–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 79 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 157 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ProfSucharitBhakdi. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 157 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

AUF1
@auf1tv · Channel
271,695 subscribers
Aktien mit Kopf
@Aktien_mit_Kopf1 · Channel
188,045 subscribers
Freie Medien
@FreieMedienTV · Channel
134,014 subscribers
LION Media
@LIONMediaNews · Channel
132,271 subscribers
Oliver Janich & Team
@oliverjanich · Channel
106,330 subscribers
Cruel History
@cruel_historyy · Channel
102,968 subscribers
LION Media TV
@LIONMediaTV · Channel
102,727 subscribers
Qlobal-Change 🫂
@QlobalChange · Channel
91,935 subscribers
Mäckle macht gute Laune
@maeklegutelaune · Channel
91,321 subscribers
BITTEL TV - EINFACH ANDERS
@bitteltv · Channel
91,047 subscribers
Aktuell360 (Antiilluminaten TV)
@antiilluminaten · Channel
89,691 subscribers
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭
@ReinerFuellmich · Channel
89,236 subscribers
Wahrheitsjäger
@Wahrheits_jaeger · Channel
83,256 subscribers
HAINTZ.media 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇪🇸
@Haintz · Channel
72,195 subscribers
henning rosenbusch - Channel
@rosenbusch · Channel
71,601 subscribers
🔎 Graphene Agenda 💉
@GrapheneAgenda · Channel
70,188 subscribers
Politische Bilder 😇
@PolitischeBilder · Channel
68,706 subscribers
HISTORY
@secret_history2 · Channel
68,537 subscribers
Stefan Magnet
@stefanmagnet · Channel
68,100 subscribers
Carsten Jahn - TEAM HEIMAT
@CarstenJahn_TEAMHEIMAT · Channel
66,988 subscribers
Tom Lausen ‼️ Original Datenanalyst Offiziell
@Tom_Lausen1 · Channel
61,309 subscribers
Dirk Dietrich
@DDDDoffiziell · Channel
55,844 subscribers
MEINE D-NEWS 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭
@MeineDNEWS · Channel
55,240 subscribers
Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab Offiziell
@ProfMartinSchwab · Channel
50,038 subscribers
Conspiracy Theory
@conspiracy_theory3 · Channel
48,508 subscribers
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · Channel
47,858 subscribers
Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab Offiziell
@ProfdMartinSchwab · Channel
45,709 subscribers
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · Channel
45,155 subscribers
Rolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal
@Rolf_Kron · Channel
43,867 subscribers
SECRETS OF HEALTH
@secret_health1 · Channel
42,475 subscribers
Cute and Fun Videos 🥰
@cuteandfunvideos · Channel
39,843 subscribers
Simone Voss - EINE LEHRERIN STEHT AUF-
@simonevoss · Channel
39,778 subscribers
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier
@rasattelmaier · Channel
38,371 subscribers
1984 – Das Magazin
@oliverflesch · Channel
36,744 subscribers
Wow!
@wowwvd · Channel
34,955 subscribers
Meet Your Mentor (mym by Simo) MYM-Clips
@MeetYourMentorOffizielle · Channel
34,656 subscribers
Heiko Schöning offiziell
@heiko_schoening · Channel
34,062 subscribers
Q-Faktor Germany News - Die Echtzeit Analyse - Das Original ©
@Q_Faktor_Germany · Channel
33,631 subscribers
JENS LEHRICH
@jenslehrich1 · Channel
33,089 subscribers
Snicklink unzensiert
@snicklink3000 · Channel
33,005 subscribers
Amazing Facts💡
@amazingfacts4 · Channel
32,557 subscribers
Politische Nachrichten 🗞
@Politische_Nachrichten · Channel
27,867 subscribers
Dave Brych Kanal
@davebrych_public · Channel
27,317 subscribers
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤
@miteinander_mutig_sein · Channel
27,029 subscribers
KateBonoAwake
@KateBono · Channel
26,980 subscribers
Kontrafunk - Die Stimme der Vernunft
@kontrafunk2 · Channel
24,240 subscribers
Danijel_Sheran17 ✨
@danijelsheran · Channel
22,850 subscribers
✨✨✨ᵂᴬQᴱᵁᴾᵂᴼᴿᴸᴰ✨✨✨ 🄰🅁🄲🄷🄸🅅✨✨✨
@waqeupworld · Channel
20,801 subscribers
Kurz und Kräftig
@Kurz_und_kraftig · Channel
20,446 subscribers
Thomas Eglinski Info-Kanal
@infothomaseglinski1 · Channel
19,975 subscribers

106 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

17,52117,99117,7566 August 2026 — 17,991 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,987 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,984 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,983 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,982 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,974 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,972 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,963 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,956 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,951 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,947 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,942 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,938 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,928 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,927 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,921 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,920 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,917 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,907 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,905 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,899 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,891 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,878 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,866 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,860 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,851 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,841 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,832 subscribers26 September 2026 — 17,758 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,726 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,705 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,690 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,678 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,668 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,660 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,656 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,651 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,642 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,634 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,631 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,622 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,614 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,606 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,603 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,601 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,594 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,586 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,578 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,573 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,571 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,566 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,558 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,557 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,553 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,549 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,542 subscribers8 November 2026 — 17,539 subscribers10 November 2026 — 17,533 subscribers12 November 2026 — 17,521 subscribers6 August 202612 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net -470. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,451–18,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:0717,521-12
10 Nov 2026, 08:4117,533-6
8 Nov 2026, 21:1817,539-3
7 Nov 2026, 15:5717,542-7
6 Nov 2026, 16:1017,549-4
5 Nov 2026, 18:1717,553-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:0617,557-1
2 Nov 2026, 18:4717,558-8
1 Nov 2026, 19:3017,566-5
31 Oct 2026, 16:4417,571-2
30 Oct 2026, 18:1117,573-5
29 Oct 2026, 21:3617,578-8
28 Oct 2026, 22:2817,586-8
27 Oct 2026, 22:4617,594-7
27 Oct 2026, 00:2817,601-2
25 Oct 2026, 22:3617,603-3
24 Oct 2026, 23:3417,606-8
24 Oct 2026, 01:2017,614-8
22 Oct 2026, 22:0117,622-9
21 Oct 2026, 16:4717,631first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 17,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,830
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held111 (22 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total139,970
Reactions total9,182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 17s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

38,434 reactions across 111 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16,47642.9%
🤬5,27413.7%
🤮3,5989.36%
❤3,3158.63%
🔥3,1438.18%
💯2,6356.86%
👏2,2935.97%
😡3560.926%
😢3190.83%
😈1830.476%
🙏1430.372%
🤯970.252%
👌830.216%
🤣790.206%
👎740.193%
🕊710.185%
😭650.169%
🤡430.112%
😱290.075%
🎉220.057%
20 further kinds1360.354%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,000 views231 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Einst Chef des deutschen Verfassungsschutzes – heute selbst im Visier seiner früheren Behörde! Wie konnte es so weit kommen? Hans-Georg Maaßen redet bei FPÖ-TV Tacheles: über politischen Druck, Einschüchterung und seine Sorge um die Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland. Ein brisantes Interview über Macht, Kritik und Meinungsfreiheit. https://youtu.be/nlv27pcxxzQ

🤮139🔥54👏25❤7👍3🙏2🤣1

10 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,990 views295 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Österreich hat die höchsten Sozialausgaben der gesamten EU, doch statt dass jene profitieren, die dieses System mit ihrer Arbeit und ihren Steuern finanzieren, explodieren die Kosten und die eigenen Bürger bleiben immer öfter auf der Strecke. Während die Regierung bei unseren Pensionisten den Sparstift ansetzen will, werden die wahren Ursachen der Kostenexplosion nicht einmal konsequent bekämpft. Nur die FPÖ sagt mi…

🤮186👍53🤬26🙏18❤5💯2🔥2😡2

9 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈3,320 views278 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Die Systemparteien sind wieder einmal nur mit sich selbst und ihren Posten beschäftigt. Die Verlierer-Ampel versinkt im totalen Chaos und zockt zudem auch noch eiskalt unsere Pensionisten ab! Und was macht VdB eigentlich? Er schweigt zu diesem ganzen Regierungschaos. https://youtu.be/7C5gjqbXQ0U?si=-8z7B2xsSJ9GtuzW

👍205💯49😡15👏4❤2🤣2🎉1

9 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈3,960 views266 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Das sollten die Pensionisten wissen!

🔥175😡64🤬16👍9🎉1🤮1

9 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,280 views383 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Die Impfpflicht war ein schwerwiegender Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit, der bis heute viele Menschen beschäftigt und unfassbaren Schaden angerichtet hat. Wir verlangen eine vollständige Aufklärung! Mehr dazu: https://www.fpoe.at/aktuell/artikel-detailansicht/impfpflicht-meinl-reisinger-muss-sofort-saemtliche-fakten-zur-abstimmung-offenlegen

👍289💯64👏12🔥6❤4🤮4😈4

9 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC≈3,410 views303 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Die im Krone.tv-Interview erhobenen Vorwürfe des NEOS-Mitgründers und nunmehr fraktionslosen Nationalratsabgeordneten Veit Dengler zur Zustimmung seiner früheren Partei zur Corona-Impfpflicht sind hochspannend. Dengler behauptet, es habe innerhalb der Partei keine Mehrheit für die Impfpflicht gegeben. Die Zustimmung sei nur erfolgt, weil Meinl-Reisinger darauf bestanden habe. Unser Generalsekretär Michael Schnedlitz …

👍251🔥35❤13🥱4

8 Nov 2026, 19:11 UTC≈3,640 views153 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Eine traurige Vorschau… https://youtube.com/shorts/dN3YSHodJXc?si=1ZY-Jg5Rf9MkaEzh

🔥123👍13😢9😡7🤡1

7 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC≈4,030 views381 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Unser Generalsekretär Michael Schnedlitz bringt es auf den Punkt: Nach diesem sozialen Offenbarungseid muss die Regierung zurücktreten! Diese Verlierer-Ampel hat beim Sparen offenbar eine Lieblingsadresse: die Geldbörsen unserer Pensionisten! Das ist keine soziale Politik, das ist Abkassieren bei jenen, die dieses Land aufgebaut haben!

👍298😈27🤬25🔥16❤7👎4😡4

6 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,960 views324 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Saubere Information, österreichisches Programm und keine Zwangsgebühr – dafür steht das ORF-Volksbegehren! Ein „Weiter wie bisher“ darf es beim ORF nicht geben! Der ORF-Privilegienstadl muss trockengelegt werden. Der ORF hat nur dann eine Zukunft, wenn er sich das Vertrauen der Bürger wieder erarbeitet. Deshalb jetzt gleich das ORF-Volksbegehren unterstützen! Alle Informationen unter www.orf-volksbegehren.at

👍259🤬48❤15💊2

4 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈5,670 views501 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Persönliche Worte unseres Bundesparteiobmanns Herbert Kickl: Liebe Freunde! Es ist so unfassbar traurig und schmerzt so sehr. Vor Kurzem habe ich die Nachricht vom plötzlichen Ableben unseres so geschätzten Klubobmann-Stellvertreters Mag. Norbert Nemeth erhalten. Sie trifft mich persönlich und die gesamte FPÖ-Familie mit voller Wucht. Wir alle sind zutiefst erschüttert und können es gar nicht fassen, dass er mit ei…

❤269😢137🕊49🙏29😭10❤‍🔥6👍1

4 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈4,250 views156 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢130🕊22🙏4

3 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC≈4,850 views247 reactionsread 12 November 2026

https://youtu.be/RfS_uLgVHPM

👍188💯48❤4😢4👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @fpoeinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTCAnonymous Poll959 voters

Was hältst du von der sogenannten "Spritpreisbremse" der Ampelregierung?

  1. Das ist eine Verhöhnung der Bürger! Mehr nicht! 😡97%
  2. Ich bin so froh und der Verliererampel unendlich dankbar! 🤡3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTCAnonymous Poll1,570 voters approx.

Wie findest du das?

  1. Ich finde es gut, dass man Projekte im Ausland mit Millionen fördert und bei unseren Bauern spart.2%
  2. Das ist eine Frechheit! 😡 Unsere heimischen Bauern gehen vor!98%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gerald Grosz
@GeraldGroszOfficial · 18,902
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 October 2026
RPP Institut - Offiziell
@rppinstitut · 60,840
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Herbert Kickl
@HKickl · 31,645
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
🇦🇹 Martin Rutter www.direktdemokratisch.jetzt
@MartinRutter · 23,021
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
🔵 Martin Sellner [TELEGRAMELITE]
@martinsellnerIB · 71,298
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
AUF1
@auf1tv · 271,695
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Stefan Magnet
@stefanmagnet · 68,100
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
apolut 🎙 podcast
@tagesdosis_KenFM · 53,335
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Kontrafunk - Die Stimme der Vernunft
@kontrafunk2 · 24,240
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Neverforgetniki
@neverforgetnikiblog · 32,295
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
Gerald Markel
@gema1963 · 30,778
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
TECHNIKUS🇦🇹NEWS🇩🇪
@technikus_news · 25,920
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
Dietrich Klinghardt Archiv&Backup
@DietrichKlinghardt · 24,509
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
OVALmedia | Deutsch
@OVALmedia · 21,925
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Ken Jebsen Backup
@kenjebsen_backup · 26,424
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
LION Media TV
@LIONMediaTV · 102,727
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q131692 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelAustrian Freedom Party
DescriptionAustrian political party
X / Twitter@fpoe_tv
YouTubeUCRdEdkAlZetdf74bYaBRv3g
Official sitehttps://www.fpoe.at/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇦🇹Festung Österreich🇦🇹” (@fpoeinfo), 17,521 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fpoeinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.