Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎦 Martin Sellner - Videos & Audios

Channel

🎦 Martin Sellner - Videos & Audios

@martinsellnervideos

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,068subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215616609
TypeChannel
Username@martinsellnervideos
Description✉️ Mein Rundbrief: https://martinsellner.info/anleitung-rundbrief/ ✅ Unterstützen: http://martinsellner.info 📱Hauptkanal: https://t.me/martinsellnerIB Alle meine anderen Links: https://bit.ly/2OWR0id
Created18 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/martinsellnervideos

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

14,300 average views per post against 13,068 subscribers — an engagement rate of 109.2%. Across the 338 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,012–31,383 subscribers, posting mainly in German — the middle half sit between 10.6% and 31.1%, with a median of 18.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 July 2026 20 August 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled114,180
Mature posts only109.2% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,068 measured 19 August 2026
Cohortb10000:deu · 338 channels · p10 5.27% · p25 10.6% · p50 18.5% · p75 31.1% · p90 47.0%
Position in cohort99.407th percentile · 5.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.229% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageGerman · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,06813,08713,077.56 August 2026 — 13,086 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,082 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,085 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,081 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,075 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,074 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,071 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,074 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,074 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,069 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,068 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,065–13,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 17:0813,068-1
18 Aug 2026, 20:0713,069-5
17 Aug 2026, 19:4613,074+6
16 Aug 2026, 14:5513,068-6
14 Aug 2026, 19:3513,074+3
13 Aug 2026, 08:1413,071-3
12 Aug 2026, 10:2413,074-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:5213,075-6
10 Aug 2026, 13:0413,081-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:5313,085+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:2113,082-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:3013,085-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:3013,087+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:4713,086first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.2%
avg views ÷ 13,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.406%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held23 (19 June 202618 August 2026)
Views total114,180
Reactions total463
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
53
Videos
851
Links
1,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
11m 16s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,270 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍88369.5%
🔥15011.8%
😁655.12%
🤬624.88%
👏574.49%
🤮493.86%
👎40.315%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,323reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈9,150 views58 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Warum gerade ich? Debanking + Zensur [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Über 120 Kontosperren, eingefrorene Gelder und blockierte Unternehmen. Das Debanking bedroht nicht nur meine persönliche Existenz, sondern lähmt ganze politische Projekte. Warum gerade ich? 👉 Meine These: An mir soll ein Exempel statuiert werden, das andere von politischer Organisation und außerparlamentarischem Aktivismus abschreckt. ______ ✅ Mitglied bei MS

👍56😁2

10 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈15,900 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Sachsen Anhalts Masterplan [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Darum geht es in meiner neuen Wunschaudioanalyse: Sachsen-Anhalt könnte zum politischen Schaufenster für ganz Deutschland werden. 👉 Eine AfD-Regierung könnte dort zeigen, was sie mit echter Macht verändern kann. 👉 Was müsste sie bei Migration, Familien, Wirtschaft, Bildung und Kultur anders machen? Und warum wäre ein Scheitern besonders gefährlich? ✅ Die komplette An

👍32

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈15,900 views46 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Unendlich Geld? [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Was würde ich mit unendlich Geld tun? Reicht Geld allein aus, um Europa zu verändern? 👉 Entscheidend ist, wie aus Geld politischer Einfluss wird. Von Thinktanks bis Remigration: Wo liegt der Hebel für echte Veränderung? ______ ✅ Mitglied bei MSLive+ werden 💬 Diese Folge diskutieren

👍46

4 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈5,230 views61 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Ceuta, Sanchez, USA & wir [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Der Migrantensturm von Ceuta lässt Fragen offen. Welche Rolle spielt Geopolitik? 👉 Wieso waren wir dort und wie hängen Demographie und Souveränität zusammen? ______ ✅ Mitglied bei MSLive+ werden 💬 Diese Folge diskutieren

👍57🔥3😁1

1 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈18,700 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Kindermangel gelöst [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Kann man den demografischen Kollaps überhaupt noch aufhalten oder ist Europas Aussterben längst besiegelt? Darum geht es in meiner neuen Wunschaudioanalyse. 👉 Warum Familienförderung allein nicht genügt und welche Fehler fast alle Staaten machen. 👉 Welche Gemeinschaften trotz aller Widrigkeiten wachsen und was Europa daraus lernen kann. ✅ Die komplette Analyse gibt es exklu

👏42👍10

31 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈18,900 views81 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🟥 Die Union übernimmt plötzlich Positionen, für die wir jahrelang diffamiert wurden. Was bedeutet das jetzt? 👉 Wie muss die AfD jetzt reagieren? Und warum darf sie ihren Kurs auf keinen Fall ändern? 🤝 Meine Arbeit Unterstützen: https://martinsellner.bio/ Bis zum 2. August hier: DE57100101234938544707 QNTODEB2XXX

😁42👍35👏4

29 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC≈14,800 views91 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Die Grünen zeigen mich an (echt) und die CDU übernimmt unsere Positionen (zum Schein). Es tut sich einiges in Deutschland. Ich fasse es in diesem Video zusammen. Meine Arbeit Unterstützen: https://martinsellner.bio/ Bis zum 2. August hier: DE57100101234938544707 QNTODEB2XXX

👍83👏6🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC≈15,600 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Der Infokrieg als Falle - Masterplan #4 🟥 Ein Ausschnitt aus der #4 Folge unseres strategischen Formats. 👉 Die Falle des Infokriegs 👉 Gangmentalität in der Bewegung 👉 Und die Schuldzuweisungen um Erik Ahrens ✅ Jetzt MSLive+ Mitglied werden und Zugang zu allen Folgen und Infografiken erhalten: https://www.subscribestar.com/martin-sellner/subscribe

🔥38👍4

21 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC≈16,100 views59 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Danger Dan ist ein Langweiler [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Danger Dan liefert mit seinem neuen Song nichts als peinlichen System-Kitsch. 👉 Er verherrlicht die Hammerbande und stilisiert linke Militanz zum Widerstand. 👉 Während er vor einer faschistischen Machtübernahme fantasiert, ignoriert er die wahre Gefahr. ______ ✅ Mitglied bei MSLive+ werden 💬 Diese Folge diskutieren

🤮44🔥8😁7

21 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC≈15,600 views55 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🔴 Sommermärchen 2026: COMPACT 07/26 👉 Die AfD ist die neue Volkspartei. Steht Deutschland vor dem politischen Umbruch? 👉 Dazu: Nord Stream, der Tiefe Staat, KI und meine neue Kolumne über Henry Nowak. Das und mehr in der aktuellen COMPACT-Ausgabe. 🛒 Das Heft bestellen ➕COMPACT abonnieren

👍49🔥5👎1

14 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈18,300 views54 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Patriotische Bank [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Ist eine patriotische Bank überhaupt realistisch? Darum geht es in meiner neuen Wunschaudioanalyse. 👉 Über 120 Mal wurde mir bereits ein Konto gekündigt. Warum findet sich trotz freiem Markt keine Bank, die politisch unbequemen Kunden dauerhaft ein Konto gibt? 👉 Ich erkläre, warum das bisher scheitert, welche Erfahrungen ich gemacht habe und was sich ändern müsste. ✅ Die komp

👍54

12 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC≈18,300 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

🎧 Selbstjustitz als Falle? [#audioanalyse] 🟥 Wut ist verständlich. Aber wohin führt sie? Warum scheitern Selbstjustiz und Straßengewalt nicht nur moralisch, sondern auch politisch? 👉 Ich spreche über den Film Citizen Vigilante und die Ausschreitungen in Belfast. ______ ✅ Mitglied bei MSLive+ werden 💬 Diese Folge diskutieren

👍35😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @martinsellnervideos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 47,437 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔵 Martin Sellner [TELEGRAMELITE]
@martinsellnerIB · 72,635
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎦 Martin Sellner - Videos & Audios” (@martinsellnervideos), 13,068 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/martinsellnervideos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.