Channel
@BruckerAfD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003140862369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BruckerAfD |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BruckerAfD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 161 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 160 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 160 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 159 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,013 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
93 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 24 | 25.8% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 21.5% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 10.8% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 8.60% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 8.60% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 7.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Statt Symbolpolitik und Fußfesseln - besser gleich abschieben! #Remigration! Nach dem islamistischen Terroranschlag am Rande des Berliner Christopher Street Days teilte Innensenatorin Iris Spranger (SPD) mit, dass auf Antrag der Polizei nun vier Gefährder eine elektronische Fußfessel tragen. Die SPD-Politikerin begrüßte die Entscheidung des zuständigen Gerichts auf Basis der Reformen des Sicherheits- und Ordnungsges…
👍4🌚1💯1
Gerade habe ich mir diese Rede von unserem EU-Parlamentarier Tomasz Froelich MdEP der AfD in der ESN-Fraktion angehört, die er kürzlich im EU-Parlament in Straßburg hielt. IMPORTIERTE GRAUSAMKEITEN Wacht auf! Er hat genau das gesagt, was wir in unserem Deutschen Bundestag so gar nicht formulieren dürften, ohne von der Sitzungsleitung unterbrochen, oder womöglich gar zur Ordnung gerufen zu werden... hört selbst und …
👍2👏1💯1
In Deutschland glaubt weniger als die Hälfte, dass sie ihre politische Meinung frei äußern können. Und 84 % glauben, dass viele Menschen nicht sagen, was sie wirklich denken, weil sie die Konsequenzen fürchten. Die Meinungsfreiheit mag formal existieren. Aber was ist sie wert, wenn die Menschen Angst davor haben, von ihr Gebrauch zu machen? Ein Grund dafür ist, dass das Gesetz zunehmend als Waffe gegen politisch A…
❤🔥1💯1
Schaut nach Teheran, nach Beirut, nach Kabul. Vor 50 Jahren trugen Frauen dort Minirock, studierten, arbeiteten, lebten frei. Dann kam der politische Islam. Und mit ihm kam das Ende jeder Freiheit für Frauen. Genau dieses Muster wird in Europa wiederholt. Nur nennen wir es hier Religionsfreiheit und völlig fehlgeleitet auch noch Toleranz. Toleranz gegenüber einer Ideologie, die selbst NULL Toleranz kennt. Der poli…
💯4🙏2❤🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
Zugegeben, ich war nicht immer der Meinung des ehemaligen BILD-Reporters Julian Reichelt. Nun hat er heute aber einen Kommentar auf X (Twitter) geschrieben, der mir großen Respekt abnötigt. Selten habe ich eine so klare und vor allem treffende Beschreibung gelesen. Seit über einem Jahrzehnt kämpfe ich mit Weggefährten und Verbündeten gegen die Islamisierung unseres Landes. Diese Worte müssen wachrütteln! Wir erle…
👍5💯1
SPANIEN ÖFFNET DAS TOR ZUR HÖLLE! 60.000 Invasoren an einem einzigen Tag. 60.000, die schwimmend, mit Schwimmreifen aus Autoschläuchen nach Ceuta strömen, während Soldaten am Zaun stehen und nichts mehr halten können. 34 Tote allein gestern, und morgen kommen die nächsten. Das ist kein Unglück, das ist eine Invasion mit Ansage, das Ergebnis linker Politik. Linksgerichtete Regierungen und ihre Gerichte vernichten …
💯3❤🔥1👌1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯1
Tausende Ausländer überrennen gerade die spanische Hafenstadt Ceuta. 👨🏿 Der Grund: Der Obersten Gerichtshofs in Spanien hat entschieden, dass Migranten, die schwimmend spanisches Staatsgebiet erreichen, nicht mehr einfach zurückgeschickt werden dürfen. 🏊🏿♂️ Europa rettet die Welt und schafft sich selbst ab. 🛑 Wenn wir jetzt nicht den Massenansturm stoppen, wird Europa in diesem Migranten-Tsunami untergehen. #listejw
🤮5😱1
So sieht eine Invasion aus. Spaniens Küsten werden gerade von illegalen Migranten aus der Dritten Welt überrannt. Politiker wie Sánchez, die das befürworten oder zulassen, sind Feinde der europäischen Nationen und Völker.
🤬6👌1
Mein Freund, Bruder im Geiste und Parteikollege Tobias Teich MdB - wie auch ich aus der Landesgruppe der AfD Bayern spricht mir aus der Seele - da unterschreibe ich jedes Wort. Klartext von Tobias Teich (MdB | AfD Bayern): „Die Altparteien kopieren zwar die AfD – aber sie werden niemals umsetzen, was sie den Bürgern versprechen!“ https://www.facebook.com/reel/3757561974390736 Quelle: Deutschland-Kurier https://www…
👏5👍1
Wer als Deutscher mit Migrationshintergrund fordert, das #Christentum abzuschaffen und Deutschland in einen islamischen Staat umzuwandeln, stellt sich gegen die Werte unseres Grundgesetzes. Wer die freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung ablehnt, muss mit den Konsequenzen des Rechtsstaats rechnen. In solchen Fällen sollte dringend über eine Änderung des Grundgesetzes diskutiert werden, die unter engen rechtsstaatlic…
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BruckerAfD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 724,790 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Erhard Brucker |
|---|---|
| Description | German politician |
| X / Twitter | @BruckerAfD |
| YouTube | UCh_WgO4BF7-e9nzHWaVj23Q |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Erhard Brucker MdB - Aufrecht. Stabil. Rechts!” (@BruckerAfD), 161 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BruckerAfD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.