Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Спекулянты

Channel

Спекулянты

@speculators3

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,215subscribers

-147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001769597203
TypeChannel
Username@speculators3
DescriptionСсылка для друзей - https://t.me/+rLmMdVni32E5NDFi Информация не является ИИР (индивидуальной инвестиционной рекомендацией). Только ознакомление. Инвестиции связаны с риском. Для связи https://finbazar.ru/profile/@Dengy_ne_problema/?ref=8541567846
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/speculators3

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,21212,36212,28712,2157 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,190–12,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:5412,215-4
10 Nov 2026, 09:1512,219+7
9 Nov 2026, 00:1612,212-9
7 Nov 2026, 18:4812,221+3
6 Nov 2026, 20:5012,218-5
5 Nov 2026, 21:3112,223-1
4 Nov 2026, 21:3912,224-6
3 Nov 2026, 21:0112,230+4
2 Nov 2026, 19:1812,226-1
1 Nov 2026, 21:5912,227+3
31 Oct 2026, 20:5612,224-1
30 Oct 2026, 20:4612,225+3
29 Oct 2026, 23:4812,222+6
29 Oct 2026, 02:2912,216-8
27 Oct 2026, 22:2012,224-3
26 Oct 2026, 20:5712,227+7
25 Oct 2026, 21:4012,220-20
24 Oct 2026, 19:4512,240-5
23 Oct 2026, 18:0112,245-7
22 Oct 2026, 18:3812,252first reading

Engagement

191 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 12,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,150
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 191 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held191 (30 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total248,612
Reactions total2,521
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,150
Videos
≈394
Links
≈917

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,163 reactions across 180 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,15630.1%
🥴1,36519.1%
👍96513.5%
❤6559.14%
👏5327.43%
🔥4035.63%
🤯1351.88%
💯1211.69%
🤔1181.65%
😢891.24%
🎉660.921%
🗿660.921%
🌭600.838%
😱560.782%
🫡480.67%
🐳460.642%
💔240.335%
🦄230.321%
☃220.307%
👀220.307%
27 further kinds1912.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 184 of the 191 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 190 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @speculators3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 191 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 79 posts held from the last 30 days (8.86%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC572 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Юрики шортят биток, а толпа покупает. Не показывайте тем, кто торгует криптой. Им лучше не знать о таких Инструментах

👍3

13 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Если нефть выше 100 апнется, не вижу причин Роснефти не подрасти до 380-390 Основной риск общий, если рынок завалят Не ИИР

👍10💯1

13 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,490 views44 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Почему все самые успешные трейдеры и блогеры Не отправляют деньги на благотворительность?

🔥31🥴9🌭4

13 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,580 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Банковский сектор прям сильно лучше рынка, но за неделю вырос достаточно, чтобы не спешить. Нефтяники пытаются догонять, пока растет нефть + газпром поддерживает рынок Причина всем известна Встреча на следующей неделе 3х президентов Но индекс пока под сопротивлением 2550, когда закреп произойдет, можно говорить , что шансы на рост выросли, откроется путь до 2600 Пока что Раньше после встреч был откат, если не б…

👍14❤4

13 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,620 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Многие не верили Но когда акции станут стоить 15 - поверят 🇷🇺#SVCB #отчетность ЧИСТАЯ ПРИБЫЛЬ СОВКОМБАНКА ПО МСФО ЗА 9 МЕСЯЦЕВ 2026 Г. УДВОИЛАСЬ Г/Г ДО 71,9 МЛРД РУБ. ЧИСТАЯ ПРИБЫЛЬ ГРУППЫ ЗА 3 КВ СОСТАВИЛА 26,6 МЛРД РУБЛЕЙ = +4% КВ/КВ = + 49% Г/Г

🥴18

12 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,380 views47 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥26☃11👏6🤝4

12 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,560 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Не удивлюсь если Трамп на Иран скоро нападет Чтобы добить рынок и обвинить бедного несчастного невинного Хуанга….

🥴28😢1

12 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,530 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Золото нереальная волатильность Просто рекордная Но тренд я определил правильно

👏13

12 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,580 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

⬇️🇺🇸#NVDA = -13% видео-конференция с новым временным CEO пройдет 18 ноября старый CEO вышел из игры

👏8❤2

12 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,510 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Рынок взбодрился, что правильные ценности в Америке имеют значение Поэтому наш рынок растет!! Да здравствует правильные семейные ценности!

🥴27🔥9

12 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,540 views60 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Тот самый ворк-лайф баланс

😁40🎉12👏4👍2❤1🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,370 views39 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Крипте конец Америке конец Насдак конец

🥴20😁15👍3🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @speculators3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@speculators3 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @speculators3 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
33 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTCAnonymous Poll1,090 voters approx.

Наш рынок на следующей неделе

  1. Упадет40%
  2. Вырастет32%
  3. Узнать30%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTCAnonymous Poll630 voters

Увидим в этом году золото по 3500?

  1. Да34%
  2. Шутишь чтоль18%
  3. Нет33%
  4. Кто такой золото?19%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTCAnonymous Poll562 voters

Вы держали озон АФК Сегежу ?

  1. Озон17%
  2. АФК13%
  3. Сегежу10%
  4. Все вместе4%
  5. Все вместе с плечами4%
  6. С плечами все вместе на всех счетах7%
  7. Спасибо друг, уберег51%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,250 voters approx.

У вас в городе есть бензин ? Честный опрос. Народный.

  1. Есть, всем хватает. Приезжайте32%
  2. Нет.43%
  3. Нет, езжу в другую страну заправиться5%
  4. У меня все хорошо. Нет машины. Нет проблем24%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTCAnonymous Poll691 voters

Как вы думаете, многие ли люди шортят озон, думая, что их ждет судьба ВБ?

  1. Думаю многие35%
  2. Думаю у многих есть мозги26%
  3. Думаю, что никто не шортит27%
  4. Я шорчу6%
  5. Я патриот9%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

У вас остались деньги на инвестиции?

  1. Да33%
  2. Нет45%
  3. Коплю12%
  4. Работаю22%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vadya93
@vadya93_official · 32,013
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
SosisochnayaGazeta
@sosisochnayagazeta · 71,816
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Аналитика От Чехова
@antonchehovanalitk · 46,069
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Sosisochniy Parser RU
@sosisochniyparserru · 21,794
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Rezan Invest
@rezinv · 19,649
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 September 2026
VM Finance
@vmfinance · 18,990
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Дэй Трейдинг Лайв
@DayTradingLiveTG · 30,002
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Invest Pleasure
@investpleasure · 19,648
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW
@Cashflowbuy · 48,952
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Вячеслав Таквель (Goodwin)
@GoodwinPro1 · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
🏴‍☠️Срочно! Идея от Черных
@srochno_chernyh · 25,219
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Спекулянты” (@speculators3), 12,215 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speculators3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.