О мотивации глобально pinned «HR аналитика в работе у C&B, опыт эксперта - открытая встреча Компенбены, приглашаю вас на открытую встречу с экспертом по HR аналитике и работе с данными. Когда: 29 августа с 11.00 по 12.30 Ссылка: https://pro-grading.timepad.ru/event/4120878/ Ждем всех!…»

Channel
О мотивации глобально
@Globaltotalrewards
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,877subscribers
-266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001295435823 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Globaltotalrewards |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Globaltotalrewards |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 5,877 | -24 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 5,901 | -30 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 5,931 | -29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 5,960 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:08 | 5,970 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 5,994 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 6,018 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 6,022 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 6,038 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 6,059 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 6,077 | -23 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 6,100 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 6,120 | -20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 6,140 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 6,143 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 6,143 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 45.7% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 18.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.26%
- 1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 523
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 854
- over 15 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VfnxyPJrg3 | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
HR аналитика в работе у C&B, опыт эксперта - открытая встреча Компенбены, приглашаю вас на открытую встречу с экспертом по HR аналитике и работе с данными. Когда: 29 августа с 11.00 по 12.30 Ссылка: https://pro-grading.timepad.ru/event/4120878/ Ждем всех! Приходите💚😘 @globaltotalrewards
❤1🔥1
📢 Забудьте про Excel: автоматический расчёт KPI, своевременные премии, удобное согласование целей и быстрые итоги 🔥 🗓 Дата: 13.08.2026 ⏳ Длительность: 90 минут 💡 Регистрация обязательна! 👩💼 Спикер: Екатерина Павлова – эксперт по проектам Performance Management. 🚀 Что вас ждет? 🔹 Как отказаться от Excel и ручных расчетов KPI и премий 🔹 Как перейти с годового цикла оценки результативности на квартальный или месячны…
🔥2
Курс о том, как собрать «тот самый файлик по ФОТ»😬 Осведомленность в области бюджетирования ФОТ является одним из ключевых факторов успеха современных HR-специалистов, так как она дает возможность: 📍Формировать ключевую компетенцию в HR. Прозрачный и понятный процесс бюджетирования способствует более четкому формированию ожиданий Бизнеса от Опекс расходов и управления ФОТ. 🖊️Качественно использовать человеческие рес…
🔥7
Международные практики C&B Сейчас фокус моих профессиональных интересов находится в международных практиках C&B😎😅 📍Если вам тоже это важно, делюсь классным ресурсом, где можно посмотреть неплохую подборку Total Rewards практик по странам. https://trwiki.com/insights @globaltotalrewards
👍14❤6🔥2
📃 Гибкий график считают ключевым фактором удержания 75% компаний, но реально предоставляют его только 40%. А понимание сотрудниками своего соцпакета в среднем тянет всего на 3,37 из 5. Такие разрывы почти в каждом исследовании про льготы и благополучие сотрудников. Мы изучили четыре крупных международных исследования 2026 года (SHRM, CIPD, Marsh McLennan Agency, TMM Recruitment) и собрали из них один отчёт — специал…
👍1🔥1
Вакансия! Кому?😅😉 (мой любименький) ВВ ищет лидера направления нематериальной мотивации команды. https://hh.ru/vacancy/134853766? 🤝развивать стратегию и систему нематериальной мотивации; 🤝повышать удержание и лояльность сотрудников; 🤝управлять действующими программами (здоровье, привилегии, бонусы и др.); 🤝анализировать эффективность решений Нужен человек с опытом в нематериальной мотивации , который/ая умеет запу…
❤5
Компенбены, доброе утро! Напоминаю, что сегодня точка-встречи, будем обсуждать ФОТ, бюджет и как это все автоматизировать! https://pro-grading.timepad.ru/event/4072493/ Ждем всех💚🤝
🔥6❤1
О мотивации глобально pinned «Онлайн встреча по ФОТ и бюджетированию Компенбены, привет! Приглашаю вас присоединиться к онлайн-встрече по ФОТ и бюджетированию. Также будет выступление Артема Астраханцева, Руководителя отдела бюджетирования и организационного планирования VK Когда:…»
Онлайн встреча по ФОТ и бюджетированию Компенбены, привет! Приглашаю вас присоединиться к онлайн-встрече по ФОТ и бюджетированию. Также будет выступление Артема Астраханцева, Руководителя отдела бюджетирования и организационного планирования VK Когда: 06.07.2026 в 18.30 https://pro-grading.timepad.ru/event/4072493/ @globaltotalrewards
❤1
Компенбены, привет! Спасибо за участие и заполненные формы. В итоге тема онлайн - встречи: управление ФОТ, автоматизация бюджетирования и все что с этим связано Вижу, что многие с этой темой провели первое полугодие и планируют не останавливаться😅 Ниже будет голосовалка по времени и дате встречи, жду ваши ответы. Если есть желающие выступить и поделиться опытом💚 - пишите мне, @Kozinchenkon @globaltotalrewards
🔥3❤1
О мотивации глобально pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Globaltotalrewards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы знаете что такое Tiny teams?
- Да, конечно9%
- Что то было вроде😬6%
- Нет, первый раз слышу84%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kadrovoedelojournal · 30,922
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 6 September 2026
@hranalitycs · 34,144
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026
@hrhubvacancy · 22,415
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 20 September 2026
@savetoreadlater · 22,278
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
@HRD_mediator · 28,633
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
@topcareerschool · 23,471
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 18 September 2026
@lemur_excel · 49,863
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
@trud_krut · 23,514
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
@ohranatruda_official · 25,133
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О мотивации глобально” (@Globaltotalrewards), 5,877 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Globaltotalrewards.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.