Channel
@naajeh_library
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
222subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001199665275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naajeh_library |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naajeh_library |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 222 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 223 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 223 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 February 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 217 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
63 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 73.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 14.3% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یادداشتها #مشاهدات اینترنتی کتابی سفارش داده بودم و آدرس مدرسه علوی را داده بودم تا در زمان کارم تحویل بگیرم. دیروز مهماندار مدرسه تماس گرفت که «بسته دارید، بیایید تحویل بگیرید و هزینه پیک را پرداخت کنید.» وقتی آمدم پایین دیدم پیک چنان راحت لم داده و با هندوانه پذیرایی شده است که میشد آثار رضایت و خوشحالی را در چشمان او دید. این احترام گذاشتن به مهمانی که صرفا پیک است، خیلی توجهم را جلب کرد. بعد با خودم فکر کردم …
❤6
امضاکنندگان از رشتههای مختلف مشاوره، روانشناسی، فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، جامعهشناسی، اقتصاد و ... بودند. این همه آدم با تخصصهای مختلف، یک لحظه پیش خودشان فکر نکردند که واقعا مساله مهم جامعه از منظر رشتهشان چیست و برای کمک به مردم چه قدمی باید بردارند؟ مگر میشود کسی سالها علوم انسانی بخواند و هنوز در تشخیص مساله (و نه راهبرد) لنگ بزند؟ خدا رحمت کند افشین یداللهی را که سرود: هرچند مضحک است و پر از خندههای تلخ بر ما…
❤2👍2
امشب تا اعماق وجودم دردم اومد. شاید هیچ زمانی مثل امروز، ایران تحت فشار خارجی و بحرانهای داخلی نبوده که موجب شود آدم با ناامیدی به آینده نزدیک خود نگاه کند. ابدا قصد القای یأس ندارم، منتها در کمال شگفتی دیدم حدود صد نفر از اساتید دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی نامهای را مبنی بر سختگیری در اجرای حجاب اجباری امضا کردهاند. بندبند این نامه که درک آکادمیسینهای بزرگترین دانشگاه اختصاصی علوم انسانی کشور از وضعیت جامعه و رسالت…
👍2🤝2
اشیاء مادی فقط ابزارهای بیجان نیستند، آنها حاملان معنا و حتی ابزارهای «مقاومت» (Resistance) هستند. داستان قبرستان «کراسبونز» در لندن مثالی درخشان از این موضوع است. این مکان که زمانی برای دفن طردشدگان و تنفروشان بود، توسط مردم عادی و با استفاده از اشیاء سادهای مثل روبانهای رنگی، به یک زیارتگاه غیررسمی تبدیل شد. آمارمن تأکید میکند که این اشیاء صرفاً نمادهای مذهبی نیستند، بلکه نوعی «اعتراض علیه بیعدالتی» به شمار…
❤2👍1
دین در مکانهای غیرمنتظره: ۷ بینش شگفتانگیز که نگاه شما را به معنویت تغییر میدهد اگر همین حالا در خیابانهای پرتردد شهر قدم بزنید، یا لابلای تصاویر اینستاگرام چرخ بزنید، ردپای دین را در جاهایی خواهید دید که در نگاه اول کاملاً سکولار به نظر میرسند؛ جوانی با تتوی مسیحی بر بازو، حجابی که در میانه یک مرکز خرید مدرن خودنمایی میکند، یا حتی گروهی که در یک کافیشاپ درباره معنویت بحث میکنند. ما جامعهشناسان متوجه شدهای…
👍2
📚 کتاب خوب و خواندنی «دین زیستهشده» ✍️ تالیف نانسی تاتوم آلمرمن بر مدار تربیت باشیم؛ @naajeh_library | 🕯 ناجه
❤2
یکی از مشکلات مدیران فرهنگی کشور ما، قطع بودن ارتباط آنها با واقعیت است. از این جهت دکتر حسین انتظامی شخصیت ویژهای در نظر من است. پیشنهاد میکنم گفتوگو با ایشان در برنامه اسپرسو را تماشا کنید. بر مدار تربیت باشیم؛ @naajeh_library | 🕯 ناجه
❤2👍1
به نظر فاصلهٔ قابل توجهی است میان مقصود تربیتی ما و آنچه بر دانشآموز پدیدار میشود. بنده ابداً قصد ندارم زحمات بزرگان تربیتی این مرز و بوم را بهخاطر تک روایتها زیر سؤال ببرم ولی همینها هشدار قابل توجهی است از آنچه زیر پوست فضای تربیتی ما اتفاق میافتد و از آن غافلایم. 📚 برگرفته از کتاب قمار دیگر، سرگذشت مصطفی ملایری فارغالتحصیل مدرسه علوی که به عضویت سازمان مجاهدین درآمد، اما بعدها توبه کرد. بر مدار تربیت ب…
❤2
«آزاده باش باری اگر دین نداشتی» زیباترین سفارش مولای ما، حسین #حسین_منزوی بر مدار تربیت باشیم؛ @naajeh_library | 🕯 ناجه
❤4
صلَّی اللهُ عَلَیکَ یَا اَبَاعَبدِاللهِ الحُسَین @feirahi
❤4
مشکل من با مقولۀ تراپی، ریشه در نگاه فوکویی دارد که در این اسلاید به رساترین شکل ممکن توضیح داده شده است. در آینده سعی میکنم شواهد بیشتری هم ارائه دهم. بر مدار تربیت باشیم؛ @naajeh_library | 🕯 ناجه
👍1
القای حسن و قبح به کلمات شما وقتی حتی با یه طوطی حرف میزنی بعد یه تایمی میبینی که اون دقیقا داره درست و به جا کلماتی رو به کار میبره. این یعنی کلمات باتوجه به موقعیتها معنی پیدا میکنن. مثلا شما واژه "خدا" رو جایگزین "شیطان" کن و "شیطان" رو هم جایگزین "خدا" و به خورد بچهای بده که تازه میخواد زبون باز کنه. از این تکنیک میشه برای تبلیغات مختلف و یا حتی اهداف اعتقادی استفاده کرد؛ مثلا همین فرد احتمالا خیلی راحتت…
👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naajeh_library. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 186,755 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@naajeh_library named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بر مدارِ تربیت؛ ناجه🕯” (@naajeh_library), 222 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naajeh_library.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.