Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Oracle Films

@OracleFilms

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,566subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267917236
TypeChannel
Username@OracleFilms
DescriptionIndependent filmmakers.
Created8 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OracleFilms

Growth

21,56621,63021,5986 August 2026 — 21,630 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,630 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,620 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,601 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,593 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,576 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,566 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,556–21,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:0821,566-10
11 Aug 2026, 13:3421,576-17
10 Aug 2026, 12:5721,593-8
9 Aug 2026, 16:0221,601-11
8 Aug 2026, 18:0021,612-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:2521,620-10
6 Aug 2026, 09:5021,630no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4121,630first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
653
Videos
688
Links
1,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35m 40s
Average length
3m 58s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,299 reactions across 17 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
94328.6%
💯75422.9%
👍51815.7%
🔥2798.46%
👏1534.64%
🤬1504.55%
🤡1173.55%
😁1153.49%
🙏872.64%
🤮320.97%
😢280.849%
🖕220.667%
🏆170.515%
🕊140.424%
🫡130.394%
🤯90.273%
🍾80.242%
70.212%
💊70.212%
🎉60.182%
8 further kinds200.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 21:14 UTC≈8,240 views356 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Happy new year folks! Quick reflection as I'm sure you're all busy ringing in 2026 in your own way. I don't know whether our output these past five years has made a huge difference in the grand scheme of things. But I do know I've put my all into it. And to the extent that it has made a difference, I'd like to say thank you to everybody for your support. Amidst the persistent chaos and despair that seems to define

274👍54🕊14🎉6🙏5🍾3

24 Dec 2025, 09:42 UTC≈8,000 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @FionaRoseDiamondVideo

Wishing everyone a wonderful Christmas, filled with joy, love, and hope. Hope is what I’m feeling most right now. Inspired—and I hope this inspires you too. From London, 13th December 2025. Mass Non-Compliance Protest against Digital ID. People watched us. They photographed us. They cheered for us—and they joined us. We must unite. We must put aside political and ideological differences. We must not be distracted

125👍27👏11🙏9🍾5🏆4🔥2

13 Dec 2025, 14:47 UTC≈21,500 views307 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

London right now

🔥15282👏39👍9🙏64💊4😍4

17 Nov 2025, 11:12 UTC≈27,100 views278 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I didn’t know if we’d see it happen. But… The Agenda: Their Vision - Your Future has ticked past 1 million views on YouTube. It's been translated into more than 13 languages. It’s been viewed directly over a half a million times on X from this account alone. It’s been uniquely downloaded over 8,000 times from the website and mirrored all over the internet. I also know that it has been distributed via physical scree

164👏62👍21🙏12🔥8🏆63👎1

17 Oct 2025, 15:36 UTC≈16,700 views192 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"If you hear the words 'digital' 'identification' 'biometrics' or 'facial recognition' you know the fix is in. Surrender to a digital ID and surrender your children's freedom." Can't say I had Aman Jabbi and The Agenda: Their Vision Your Future appearing on Sky News Australia on my 2025 bingo card, but I'm here for it. We must all unite against the digital panopticon. "The reality of digital identity is not about

💯158🔥197👏3🏆2🙏2💔1

26 Sept 2025, 13:13 UTC≈18,600 views357 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have Digital ID" Why would they need to threaten you with losing your job in order to get you to do something that's supposedly in your interest? And doesn't that sound familiar? This is No Jab, No Job 2.0. You know what to do.

💯188🤬84🤡30🖕2217🙏6👍5💊3

26 Sept 2025, 08:54 UTC≈9,640 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @FionaRoseDiamondPhoto

‼️CHOOSE TO RESIST DIGITAL ID, OR IT WILL BE THE LAST CHOICE YOU EVER GET TO MAKE‼️ "All tyrannies rule through fraud & force, but once the fraud is exposed, they must rely exclusively on force." 📛️We will not trade our freedom for a QR code. 👁We reject coercion. We reject the creation of a central dossier on every citizen. We reject a future where access to daily life is contingent on compliance. ❌️No to constan

👍77💯2616👏7🔥4

26 Sept 2025, 08:54 UTC≈8,150 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍74😁1812💯7

25 Sept 2025, 15:38 UTC≈24,500 views247 reactionsread 12 August 2026

BREAKING: Digital ID to be made law for all adults in the UK. "The proposals are the government's latest attempt to tackle illegal immigration, with the ID serving as a form of proof of the right to live and work in the UK." So says Sky News. Unpopular opinion: To the folks saying "we don't have a choice" as they're predictably being threatened with ostracization and inconvenience... There's always a choice. It's

💯17827🔥21👍15🙏6

24 Sept 2025, 15:27 UTC≈8,910 views153 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

YouTube admits to censoring people during COVID-19... No kidding. This is a sample of the content we had pulled down across four separate accounts during that time. It got so ridiculous at one point they were pulling our stuff before it had even finished uploading. We have never, to this day, been able to monetise on YouTube. Still, no regrets.

👍92🙏23🔥17🫡138

24 Sept 2025, 15:01 UTC≈13,900 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"Do you honestly believe the government wants to roll out this giant digital ID scheme for your convenience?" "They need to link everything you do to a digital system." "You are being lied to. 100%." "Ask why." All credit to the superb Alistair Williams 🔗 Source 🔗 Support Alistair's work here

💯81👏227🙏6🤝1

16 Sept 2025, 14:23 UTC≈22,400 views228 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BBC: People warning about there being a centralised, global shift towards eating insects is hindering the centralised, global shift towards eating insects. 🔗 Source

😁97🤡87🤮21👍129👏1🤓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @OracleFilms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 189,013 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oracle Films” (@OracleFilms), 21,566 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OracleFilms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.