Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Manchester United Empire

Channel

Manchester United Empire

@Empire_MU

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,308subscribers

-2,919 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001141210030
TypeChannel
Username@Empire_MU
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Empire_MU

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Empire_MU/23576 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC@officialmanchester/124474 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@Empire_MU/23577 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC@officialmanchester/124495 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC1.002.4 hours
@Empire_MU/23617 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC@officialmanchester/1252412 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC1.0046 minutes
@Empire_MU/23690 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC@officialmanchester/1269624 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC1.003.6 hours
@Empire_MU/23694 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC@officialmanchester/1270225 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC1.0048 minutes
@Empire_MU/23782 · this entry17 Sept 2026, 04:28 UTC@officialmanchester/1298917 Sept 2026, 05:35 UTC1.0067 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@officialmanchester37 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 minutesthis entry (35–2)
@Manchester_UtdCentral9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975.0 hours@Manchester_UtdCentral (6–3)
@manchesterunited8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.974.2 hours@manchesterunited (5–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 384 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

62,30865,22763,767.57 August 202613 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -2,919. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,870–65,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 15:2062,308-54
11 Nov 2026, 01:5762,362-31
9 Nov 2026, 13:0262,393-47
8 Nov 2026, 01:0862,440-32
6 Nov 2026, 20:2962,472-33
5 Nov 2026, 23:1562,505-36
5 Nov 2026, 02:2062,541-17
4 Nov 2026, 04:5962,558-47
3 Nov 2026, 01:4162,605-37
1 Nov 2026, 22:5962,642-43
31 Oct 2026, 23:3562,685-59
31 Oct 2026, 01:3862,744-28
29 Oct 2026, 22:3162,772-57
29 Oct 2026, 00:3262,829-31
27 Oct 2026, 22:2662,860-43
26 Oct 2026, 20:0962,903-18
25 Oct 2026, 18:4562,921-23
24 Oct 2026, 22:1062,944-36
23 Oct 2026, 22:1562,980-13
23 Oct 2026, 01:2162,993first reading

Engagement

556 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.27%
avg views ÷ 62,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,780
235 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
235
of 556 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held556 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total1,357,481
Reactions total14,384
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

43,626 reactions across 556 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤25,18157.7%
👍7,15816.4%
👎5,75213.2%
😁2,1514.93%
🤬1,6023.67%
😢1,2372.84%
😱5451.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 556 of the 556 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,626 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 556 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 556 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Empire_MU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 556 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 45 of 235 posts held from the last 30 days (19.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC951 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Mauricio Pochettino is set to become Manchester United’s new manager, with the deal essentially done after United activated his roughly $9–10 million release clause with the US men’s national team. A two-and-a-half-year contract has been agreed, with documents sent to Pochettino’s lawyers for signing ahead of an expected official announcement this weekend. Pochettino will still lead the USMNT through their next tw…

👎13❤3👍2😱1

13 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,860 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🗣️ Laurie Whitwell on the contrast of what Jason Wilcox looks for as to what Manchester United fans expect: "Early on in his time with United, he suggested Russell Martin for head-coach as a figure he thought was good coach. It shows the pool which he was thinking about appointing as a Manchester United manager. I think he does the same thing when it comes to players. People tell me he was a very good eye for talen…

❤8

13 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈2,600 views53 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨💣 BREAKING: Bruno Fernandes has TURNED DOWN a SECOND contract offer from Manchester United. Further talks are anticipated. #MUFC [laurie whitwell, Adam Crafton]

👍47😱4❤1😢1

13 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTC≈3,090 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Mauricio Pochettino will become the new Manchester United boss on a 2 and half year contract. Mauricio Pochettino will sign a 2.5-year contract with Manchester United. He will TAKE OVER after the international break. [David Ornstein]

👎29👍10❤1🤬1

12 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC≈4,180 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🗣️ Andy Mitten on if Michael Carrick had any knowledge that he would be sacked by Manchester United during the international break: "My understanding is that after the Bournemouth game, there was an indication to him that there was this period until the international break to see how things go. It was an understanding. On Monday, I think there was some communication to Michael or his agent that this Monaco trip is …

❤29😢13

12 Nov 2026, 20:42 UTC≈4,080 views49 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🗣️ Andy Mitten on Michael Carrick protecting the players and Manchester United: "Michael Carrick has covered for other people at Manchester United. He could’ve thrown players, United officials and people above him under the bus, but he chose not to. There’s been times where he’s been absolutely hammering those players in the dressing room and comes out to face the media with no evidence he’s done that. He’s been ca…

👍35❤13👎1

12 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC≈4,040 views61 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨💣 BREAKING: Manchester United believe Mauricio Pochettino can challenge for European places and will back him in the January transfer window. [Telegraph Ducker]

😁41👍13🤬5❤2

12 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈5,170 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨 Manchester United expect Mauricio Pochettino to arrive at Carrington by Nov. 18 at the latest ahead of his first game in charge against Liverpool at Anfield on Nov. 22. The bulk of United's international players are also set to return to Carrington by Nov. 18. [Rob Dawson , ESPN]

👍39👎7❤5🤬1

12 Nov 2026, 13:48 UTC≈5,130 views49 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨 Michael Carrick had hoped to sign BOTH Elliot Anderson and Morgan Rogers for Manchester United. Carrick was convinced Rogers WANTED to move to United, but United were never going to get close to the eventual £117m Chelsea paid.[Telegraph Ducker]

👎40❤5👍4

12 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC≈5,050 views76 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨 Michael Carrick's backroom staff are unhappy and angry at the whole sacking situation. Only got formal confirmation this morning at 8:30 & they're not happy with it coming out in the media first. Carrick said his goodbyes to staff this morning. [SullyTalkz, UtdDistrict]

😢66❤9👎1

12 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC≈5,170 views58 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🚨💣 BREAKING: Mauricio Pochettino's move to replace Michael Carrick as Manchester United manager is being finalised. A deal has been agreed for the USA boss and his staff to become the club’s next boss following the dismissal of Carrick. It is understood Pochettino has informed the US soccer federation of his desire to become United’s new boss. Omar Berrada has made official contact with US officials to confirm the …

❤46👎12

12 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,930 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Manchester United’s bill for hiring and sacking managers, coaches and senior staff is expected to reach £108.2 MILLION since Sir Alex Ferguson retired in 2013. That estimate includes the expected cost of bringing in Mauricio Pochettino and his staff after Michael Carrick’s sacking.

👎41😱6👍2❤1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 556 posts we hold for @Empire_MU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Empire_MU edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

🇬🇧 Manchester United 🇬🇧
@manchester · 114,195
#1
Manchester United Central🔱🔴
@Manchester_UtdCentral · 120,026
#2
MANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 92,355
#3
🔴Manchester United🔴
@manchester_united_uk · 50,838
#4
🇬🇧Manchester United🇬🇧
@officialmanchester · 35,516
#5
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 255,540
#6
UTD Passion 🔴 Manchester United
@manchesterunited_passion · 13,804
#7
Football Zone⚽️⚠️
@footymadness · 6,909
#8
Michael Carrick's Reds🔴
@manutdstand · 2,179
#9
FREE MASTER 🎱
@homeofwinnings69 · 13,084 (as read 21 August 2026)
#10
Manchester City FC
@manchester_city · 128,133
#11
United Xyz
@UtdXyz · 458
#12
Manchester United 🛑🛑
@manchesterutdfcl · 1,178
#13
Man Utd Goals
@ManUtd_Videos · 35,944
#14
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG · 395,682
#15
Sky Sports
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 26
#16
English Premier League Update
@Premier_League_Update · 120,411
#17
Transfer News Football
@transfer_news_football · 86,351
#18
Ethio Manchester United Official
@Manchester_Unitedfanns · 213,749
#19
Here We Go Club
@herewegoclub · 81,828
#20
Troll Football
@Troll_Football_Telegram · 143,824
#21
Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomano_uk · 71,388
#22
Fantasy Premier League #FPL
@fpl_ut · 33,601
#23
B/R Football
@br_football_news · 78,803
#24
Manchester United - Sun Sport
@ManchesterUnitedSunSport · 89,906
#25
VETLAND SPORTS
@vetland_sports_football1 · 107,045
#26
ESPN FOOTBALL
@Espn_Football_News_UK · 108,131
#27
Манчестерский Ногомяч
@theunitedmyach · 2,563
#28
Premier League
@premier · 148,047
#29
man_united6
@man_united4 · 16
#30
SOFA SCORE ⚽️
@sofascore_uk · 55,244
#31
Just Football
@jfball · 89,073
#32
David Ornstein | The Athletic
@David_Ornstein · 18,737
#33
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 146,459
#34
Манчестер Юнайтед
@United_Manchester · 14,824
#35
Premier League
@premier_league_football_news · 86,757
#36
Football
@footballfactlys · 31,651
#37
433
@Football433_uk · 69,250
#38
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 142,739
#39
Squawka Football
@squawka_football_news · 8,500
#40
ESPN FC
@Espnfc_news · 60,928
#41
ESPN FC
@espnfc1 · 51,675
#42
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano · 59,462
#43
Premier League
@english_premier_league_links · 38,264
#44
Fantasy Premier League
@fpl_in_telegram · 57,454
#45
CHELSEA NEWS 🗞 🔵
@Chelsea_fc_worldwide · 93,226
#46
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_Sportz_football · 63,883
#47
Football memes
@soccer_memes · 33,928
#48
Chelsea FC 🔵
@CFC_ChelseaFC · 135,045
#49
Goal Sport™
@goal_sport_football · 39,137
#50
Bayern Munchen
@bayern_munich · 31,993
#51
منچستریونایتد | یونایتد | United Fire
@UnitedFire · 3,607
#52
Transfer News Live
@TransferNews_Live · 48,910
#53
Sky Sports News
@skysport_football_official · 51,237
#54
LIVE SCORE MATCH T20
@live_score_Cricket · 34,873
#55
FOOTY TOUCH | EuroFootball
@football_touchline · 34,162
#56
LIVERPOOL FC
@liverpool_worldwide · 61,197
#57
TIKVAH-ETHIOPIA
@tikvahethiopia · 1,621,097
#58
ማን ዩናይትድ ኢትዮ ፋንስ | Man United Fans Ethiopia
@man_united_ethio_fan · 428,790
#59
4-3-3 ስፖርት በኢትዮጵያ™
@bisrat_sport_433et · 563,142
#60
Troll Premier League
@TrollPL · 4,462
#61
Красная Банда
@redbandsite · 2,433
#62
TIKVAH-SPORT
@tikvahethsport · 291,946
#63
Red Vlog Insides
@redvloginsides · 1,198
#64
The Reds • Манчестер Юнайтед 🔴
@manchesterunited365 · 7,188
#65
REAL MADRID C.F.
@Realmadrid_world · 113,626
#66
🇾🇪 Красный театр 🔱
@krasny_teatr · 2,658
#67
DREAM SPORT ™
@DREAM_SPORT · 315,052
#68
FC BARCELONA
@barcelonaen · 115,597
#69
ስካይ Sport ET™ / Semay Sport
@SSport_Ethiopia · 270,066
#70
90 ደቂቃ SPORT
@Zetena_Dekika_Sport · 307,778
#71
Natnael Mekonnen
@NatnaelMekonnen21 · 179,715
#72
GOLD FIXED BETTING
@Goldfixedbetting · 5,137
#73
SoccerKing 霸王波
@soccerking_live · 12,713
#74
አዲስ ነገር መረጃ
@Addis_News · 101,940
#75
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 110,903
#76
ማን ዩናይትድ ኢትዮ ፋንስ ትሮል
@man_united_ethio_fans_troll · 155,748
#77
FC BARCELONA™
@FCBarcelonaenn · 99,144
#78
🔴红魔曼联🔴💯
@reddevilsdiehardfans · 2,256
#79
ETHIO REAL MADRID
@Ethio_Real_Madrid_15 · 244,509
#80
Muktarovich Ousmanova
@MuktarovichOusmanova · 59,682
#81
Commercial Bank of Ethiopia - Official
@combankethofficial · 220,119
#82
Buzz 📚 History
@buzzhistory · 50,162
#83
Lionel Messi
@Messi_lionel_uk · 51,183
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇬🇧 Manchester United 🇬🇧
@manchester · 114,195
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
MANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 92,355
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Man Utd Goals
@ManUtd_Videos · 35,944
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
🇬🇧Manchester United🇬🇧
@officialmanchester · 35,516
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
🔴Manchester United🔴
@manchester_united_uk · 50,838
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Manchester United Central🔱🔴
@Manchester_UtdCentral · 120,026
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Manchester United - Sun Sport
@ManchesterUnitedSunSport · 89,906
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
David Ornstein | The Athletic
@David_Ornstein · 18,737
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
Sky Sports World
@sky_sports_world · 78,441
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
Fantasy Premier League #FPL
@fpl_ut · 33,601
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 255,540
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Premier League
@premier · 148,047
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
English Premier League Update
@Premier_League_Update · 120,411
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Sky Sports
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 26
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Here We Go Club
@herewegoclub · 81,828
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
SOFA SCORE ⚽️
@sofascore_uk · 55,244
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomano_uk · 71,388
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Manchester United Empire” (@Empire_MU), 62,308 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Empire_MU.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.