Без подготовки, сразу после мероприятия, блиц-интервью, вопросы которого я не знала заранее... Получилось, как получилось, но интересно послушать и посмотреть на результат) Мне нравится) Спасибо, Ларисе @larisa_plotnik, журналисту за этот экспромт)

Channel
Фокус психолога
@ElenaZaytceva_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
171subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001714035881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElenaZaytceva_psy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElenaZaytceva_psy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 171 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 168 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 168 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.7%
- avg views ÷ 171 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 32.0
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 22.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 March 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 160 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 35s
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 38 | 46.9% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 13.6% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ElenaZaytceva_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ЛЮДИ МОЕГО ДНЯ Знакомьтесь, это Лена @ElenaZaytceva! Лена – создатель Сообщества «Бизнес-леди Коммунарки», которому недавно исполнилось 5 лет. У Лены внутри – моторчик, она умеет обнимать, и в ее планах - обнять всю Новую Москву. Мне кажется, у нее получится, потому что к ней постоянно приходят люди, которые охотно протягивают руки для объятий. Кроме того, она знает алгоритм исполнения желаний и умеет им пользов…
🔥5❤1
Я заявила о пересборке сообщества и наших планах вчера на нетворкинге, на открытом мероприятии. Было интересно наблюдать: - по тому, что мы делаем, люди участливо кивали, апплодировали, говорили слова в подтверждение, что сообщество должно идти туда, куда мы наметили... Даже еще до моей презентации ко мне подошла участница, котороя живет в центре Москвы, приезжает к нам всего второй раз, не очень знает "внутрянку" …
Новый вызов: я пересобираю сообщество и себя заодно Уже год, как я пересобираю модель сообщества. Не с нуля, а скорее, как перестраивают дом, не выходя из него: стены уже есть, но всё остальное меняется до неузнаваемости. В один момент я поняла: то, что я создавала для себя, давно выросло. И требует новой стратегии. Именно тогда появился партнер, с которым сейчас мы вместе создаем систему, влияющую на развитие пред…
🔥7❤4🏆1
"Лена, почему ты решила создать сообщество?" - этот вопрос я стала слышать все чаще. С момента, когда стали заметны результаты... Возможно, моя история отзовется тем, кто сейчас ищет себя сейчас в бизнесе или в другой новой роли. Когда я переехала в Коммунарку, я чувствовала себя одинокой и "невидимой". Хотя, это началось немного раньше: сначала был второй декрет, работа, быт. Арома-девичники и консультации - то, ч…
🔥6
Доброе солнечное утро! Сегодня оставлю здесь отзыв, объединяющий сразу несколько моих ролей в профессиональной деятельности: основатель сообщества и психолог, ведущая трансформационных игр и ретритов. Отзыв, который в трудное время, когда нет сил двигаться дальше, будет давать опору. Благодарю за него. Невероятно ценно читать спустя годы о том, как то, что я делаю, влияет на жизни людей🙏🏼 Лена, привет! У меня возн…
🔥7❤3
- Никогда бы не подумала, что ты психолог? - Почему? - Ты для психолога очень активная. Как бизнес-тренер - да! Но не как психолог. - А какие обычно тебе встречались психологи? - Ну... такие: нудные, скучные... Мой диалог с одной из участниц апрельского нетворкинга в бизнес-сообществе, которая подарила мне свою книгу с автографом🫶 Мне очень интересно, мои наблюдатели: - А как вы видите психологов? - Если вы ещё не…
❤5
А что, если просто… остановиться? (эксперимент для трудоголиков) Помните, я подняла выше тему, что трудоголизм часто не про любовь к работе, а про избегание. Пустоты, тревоги, себя. Работать, чтобы не чувствовать. И чем больше работать, тем меньше шансов услышать себя. Но есть один вопрос, который часто даже не задается: "А что будет, если просто остановиться? Не на час, не на вечер, а, ну, хотя бы, на пару дней?" …
❤3👍2
Трудоголизм не гордость, а повод бить тревогу. Данные исследований 2023 год оказался богатым на исследования в теме трудоголизма (статья Стэндордского университета, . Ученые выяснили несколько важных вещей. Норвежские исследователи провели первый масштабный мета-анализ: 53 исследования из 23 стран, 71 625 человек (статья Стенфордского университета) Результат: каждый седьмой работник (14%) подвержен трудоголизму. В…
🔥3
Когда задачи не кончаются, а "стоп-кран" сломан У меня нет графика. Нет звонка с работы, который говорит: "Все, ты свободна". Нет даже четкого разделения на "рабочее" и "личное" - потому что телефон всегда рядом, а мысли о проектах никуда не уходят. Я работаю на себя. И это значит, что задачи никогда не заканчиваются. Завершила один проект, появляется следующий. Провела сессию, а в мессенджере десяток непрочитанны…
❤2
Винсент Ван Гог видел мир иначе Сегодня посмотрела фильм о Ван Гоге. Хочу обсудить с вами не его трагическую судьбу, не гениальные картины, а то, как он описывал свое восприятие мира. Он говорил: Я вижу в природе нечто такое, что нельзя выразить словами. Все вокруг меня пульсирует, движется, дышит" Для него звезды были не точками на небе, а живыми существами. Поле пшеницы - океаном эмоций. Кипарисы - языками пла…
👍3🔥3❤1
Счастье — штука разная. Какой вариант счастья про вас сегодня?
- Кофейное — утро началось с идеального капучино, и мир прекрасен.30%
- Солнечное — выглянуло солнце, и сразу захотелось жить.50%
- Ленивое — выходной, и вы ничего не делаете с чувством глубокого удовлетворения.10%
- Рабочее — закрыли большой проект / получили классный отклик / наконец-то дописали пост.0%
- Коммуникативное — кто-то написал / позвонил / обнял именно тогда, когда надо.10%
- Счастье-невидимка — вроде ничего особенного, но на душе тепло.30%
- Свой вариант, напишу в комментариях0%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ElenaZaytceva_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Счастье — штука разная. Какой вариант счастья про вас сегодня?
- Кофейное — утро началось с идеального капучино, и мир прекрасен.30%
- Солнечное — выглянуло солнце, и сразу захотелось жить.50%
- Ленивое — выходной, и вы ничего не делаете с чувством глубокого удовлетворения.10%
- Рабочее — закрыли большой проект / получили классный отклик / наконец-то дописали пост.0%
- Коммуникативное — кто-то написал / позвонил / обнял именно тогда, когда надо.10%
- Счастье-невидимка — вроде ничего особенного, но на душе тепло.30%
- Свой вариант, напишу в комментариях0%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 866,768 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фокус психолога” (@ElenaZaytceva_psy), 171 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElenaZaytceva_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.