Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РАЗЗАКОВ. СПРЯТАННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ

@fedorraz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

5,661subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001895168288
TypeChannel
Username@fedorraz
DescriptionКанал для тех, кто хочет узнать больше, чем положено.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fedorraz

Growth

5,6615,6715,6667 August 2026 — 5,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,671 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,661 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,660–5,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:465,661-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:125,666-5
7 Aug 2026, 11:465,671no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:345,671first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,010
Videos
40
Links
319

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,436 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍73251.0%
21715.1%
💯946.55%
🔥835.78%
🙏473.27%
👏453.13%
👎402.79%
💩392.72%
🤝302.09%
😁201.39%
🤬161.11%
🤔151.04%
😱120.836%
🤯110.766%
🌚90.627%
70.487%
🤡50.348%
😈30.209%
❤‍🔥20.139%
🥴20.139%
6 further kinds70.487%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 May 2026, 04:31 UTC≈3,130 views212 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С праздником Великой Победы!

121🔥58👍21🤝10👏2

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

9 May 2026, 02:58 UTC≈2,960 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мероприятие на Delib! https://delib.ru/meetings/1799

👍23👏2

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

7 May 2026, 05:40 UTC≈3,210 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/qt8pxQq4O5Y?si=8eicAWj-NU7aXyJj

👍58👏5💯32🤝2🔥1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

7 May 2026, 05:07 UTC≈3,050 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/hoWPLfAZmxE?si=ZDTm-oLZOFj5nDFL

👍60🔥8💯2🤝1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

17 Mar 2026, 10:21 UTC≈5,170 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @knijnij_denPhoto

Спецслужбы всегда перерастают власть: почему это повторяется в любой стране | Фёдор Лисицын В новом выпуске проекта «Живая рецензия» Фёдор Лисицин разбирает второй том пятитомника Фёдора Раззакова о трансформации российских спецслужб от дореволюционной охранки к советским органам — книгу про ВЧК/ОГПУ и период 1917–1934. Лисицин обсуждает, почему любая спецслужба быстро превращается в бюрократию и начинает сопротивля

👍3819💯7🔥3👎2🎅1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

16 Mar 2026, 04:40 UTC≈4,330 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Добрый день, создал https://delib.ru/meetings/1756

👍595🤝2🥰1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

14 Mar 2026, 09:46 UTC≈4,580 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Леонид Ильичёв.

👎16💩9🌚622👻1🙈1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

14 Mar 2026, 09:44 UTC≈3,940 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- В отличие от Галича Высоцкий влетён в нашу внутреннюю и внешнюю политику, - практически с ходу ответил Брежнев. – Без него могут возникнуть проблемы у Театра на Таганке, который играет большую роль в наших взаимоотношениях с либеральной интеллигенцией. Вы же сами приложили руку к появлению на свет любимовского театра. - Ты путаешь, Леонид – моего участия в этом нет, - поспешил напомнить своему собеседнику о события

👍37🤯1185💯5🔥2👀1🤔1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

12 Mar 2026, 09:57 UTC≈3,490 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Суслов Брежневу: "Лёня, с Высоцким надо кончать. Чем он лучше Галича?".

💯25😁20🔥2🤔1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

12 Mar 2026, 09:56 UTC≈3,040 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

31. Итак, в среду 26 июня 1974 года Леонид Брежнев пришёл в кабинет Михаила Суслова, который находился на 5-м этаже в здании ЦК КПСС на Старой площади по-соседству с кабинетом Генсека. Главный идеолог не удивился этому визиту, поскольку знал о нём заранее, предупреждённый Брежневым по телефону. Более того, Суслов знал и о цели этого визита, что устраняло лишнее пустословие и способствовало быстрому переходу к самой с

👍48🤔94🤝1🤬1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

11 Mar 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,880 views204 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rus_vitaPhoto

С юбилеем! 10 марта отмечает 80-летие выдающий советский актёр Владимир Гостюхин. Присоединяемся к поздравлениям многочисленных почитателей его таланта! Фонд «Русский Витязь» всегда будет с благодарностью помнить, что Владимир Васильевич был в числе тех (прямо скажем единичных представителей актёрской «гильдии», наряду с Марией Шукшиной и Юрием Назаровым), кто поддержал наш проект установки памятника Иосифу Сталину

👍13340👏23🤝4❤‍🔥2🔥2

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

11 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,490 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Открытка Высоцкого братьям Стругацким с дарственной надписью.

👎20🤡5🌚2👍2🥴21🔥1

Signed Фёдор Раззаков

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fedorraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 476,757 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Раззаков, Фёдор Ибатович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…YouTube] * t.me/fedorraz (Телеграм-канал "Раззаков. «Спрятанная история») * t.me/razzakov1962 (Телеграм-канал «Раззаков. СССР. Ежедневник») * t.me/razzakow62…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАЗЗАКОВ. СПРЯТАННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ” (@fedorraz), 5,661 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fedorraz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.