Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مزاج

@Niescafeh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,580subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001666569293
TypeChannel
Username@Niescafeh
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Niescafeh

Growth

5,5525,5805,5666 August 2026 — 5,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,552 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,580 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,548–5,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:435,580+11
10 Aug 2026, 04:235,569+17
6 Aug 2026, 22:535,552-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:455,553no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:395,553first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 5,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held27 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total39,067
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 27 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Niescafeh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC237 viewsread 12 August 2026

ولكن الانسان بطبيعتهُ ينحاز لمكان تألفهُ روحهُ مهما كانت فرص الحياة كثيره

11 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC262 viewsread 12 August 2026

يعرف كيف تكون الرجوله لا احتاج أن انشر شيئاً ليفهم حزني او أضع اعجاباً على وردة ليدرك انها أعجبتني يعرف كيف يكون حنوناً لا احتاج ان اشرح كيف يجب ان يعاملني ويعاملني كأنني إبنته المُدللله والوحيده

11 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC424 viewsread 12 August 2026

عندما تُنازل خسيساً بأسلوبه تتساوى معه فلا تسمح لأحدٍ أن يُنزلك لمستواه وإن كان لا بد من خوض ذلك النزال فلا تدعه يختار لك سلاحك الغايات لا تُبرر الوسائل! والغايات النبيلة لا تبقى كذلك إذا سعينا لها بوسائل خسيسة! نقاء السلاح ضروري لنقاء النصر فالنصرُ الملوث هزيمة أخرى مهما حاولنا أن نقنع أنفسنا بالعكس

10 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC580 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

وحدة من أشكال النعم يكون عندك غرفة خاصة

9 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC774 views0 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026

يتخيل الإنسان فيك ما يرغبه منك لذالك يشعر بأنك خدعته حينَ تناقض خيالاته!

8 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,010 views0 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026

كان اليوم متعبًا جدًا أخذ مني أكثر مما أستطيع أن أقول لكن لا بأس سيمر وسأتجاوزه كما تجاوزت أيامًا ظننت أنني لن أتجاوزها سأمنح قلبي بعض الهدوء، وأترك للغد فرصة ليكون ألطف

8 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,030 views0 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

أحبّ الأطفال حبًا لا يُفسَّر كأنهم الجزء الألطف من هذا العالم ضحكتهم تذيب قلبي وبراءتهم نقطة ضعفي وأمام طفلٍ صغير تسقط كل قسوتي

6 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC≈1,380 views0 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

لله قلبي وأنا وحيرتي وضياعي وأحلامي وآمالي لله ألمي وفرحي وحزني ودمعي لله صبري وقوتي وضعفي وتشتت أفكاري لله أمري كله، وعليه اتكالي وجميع أمور حياتي

6 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 12 August 2026

من قال إن الكلمات لا تفعل شيئًا؟ إنها تلمس، وتُغرق، وتُنقذ، وتُدفئ تجعلك تطير وتتسع، وأحيانًا تُلصقك بالأرض حتى تتمزق.

6 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 12 August 2026

حنونة حتى في رفضي أمد حدوداً لا جراحاً.

6 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏سيروا إلى الله تسير إليكم حوائجكم تِباعًا، فإن ابتعدتم عن الله بعُدَت عنكم حتى تلك التي بين أيديكم🩷

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Niescafeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,719 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سأكون طبيباً💉🩺👩‍⚕️
@drzahoraaa9 · 356,364
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
كبرياء وغرور اقتباسات
@fffrdfj · 111,622
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
ملاذ الرُوح ツ♥ُ .
@Malath_AlroOoh · 211,990
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
وَهم - illusion
@Oneillusion · 135,065
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
حبر القلم 🏞
@hfggghjj · 283,420
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
مكتبة إقرٲ الٳلكترونية pdf 📚
@books_p · 178,920
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
شذرات فلسطينية 🇵🇸
@ShatharatPal · 125,204
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
القناة التعليمية بصنعاء
@Educational3 · 179,207
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة اليمن نت الرسمية
@ALYEMENNET · 204,682
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مزاج” (@Niescafeh), 5,580 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Niescafeh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.