لا تربطوا الأغاني بشخص معين. الأغاني لا تربطوها بشخص معين. بشخص معين لا تربطوا الأغاني.

Channel
-سبيشّل.
@I_5_d
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,782subscribers
+94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001931027778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @I_5_d |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/I_5_d |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 6,782 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 6,781 | +7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 6,774 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 6,769 | +22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 6,747 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 6,758 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 6,754 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 6,741 | +8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 6,733 | +23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 6,710 | +17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 6,693 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 6,686 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 6,687 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 6,688 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 6,688 | first reading |
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 77 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 154
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 77 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 50
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @I_5_d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
من أغنية تغير مزاجي الى شيءٍ آخر، هل ما أخشاه تمكن مني؟
يعني احنا بنقعد متأكسدين كذا لحد ديسمبر؟!
Sticker, posted without a caption
السلام عليكم، أنا بشتغل شغلة toxic جدًا ، مهما اقدم لها بتحسسني اني not good enough
مسلسل الـ ai اللي هيخليك تسحب على المسلسلات الواقعية يتصل بكه...
أنت مفكر إن جملة "صباح الخير" تنظّف أثر الأمس؟ تمسح الوجع، وتسوي ديليت لكل الحياة السيئة اللي عشتها قبل لا تطلع الشمس وتداعب مسامات جلدك اللي تشبّعت كآبة وتعاسة؟! لا وربك ، بس "هذا ما وجدنا عليه آباءنا" وهذا هو الإتيكيت الافتراضي!
صباح الخير!
محد بيتكلم عن محادثات العتاب اللي بتعملها فِ دماغك عشان تحس إنك قُلت للشخص كل حاجة كُنت كاتمها، وتحس بـ دوبامين زائف وتعرف تنام؟
ليست قناة ، إنما رُكنٌ صغيرٌ للسخرية من الحياة اليومية، العلاقات، المواقف، الحظ، المجتمع، وحتى النفس البشرية؛ نُجمّل فيه البؤس حتى يبدو مضحكًا.
فَيا ليلُ كم من حاجةٍ لي مُهمّةٍ إِذا جِئتكُم بِالليلِ لم أَدرِ ماهيا؟!
السلام عليكم، أنا زعلانة جدًا من حياتي اللي قلبت جد مرة واحدة.
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @I_5_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
البقاء..
- للأقوى.15%
- للأذكى.12%
- للأكثر تكيفًا.36%
- للأكثر صبرًا.37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@u222c · 85,064
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
@DII_lID · 34,229
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@DlI_lD · 54,129
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@sawadRI1 · 33,190
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
@mttttww · 56,203
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
@Tfa9ill · 25,656
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@daoihe · 23,434
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
@D_J_A · 53,560
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
@zahre2000 · 281,428
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@H1HOD · 39,571
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@alhyunemia · 143,532
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@CCD88 · 73,543
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@Qgrrg · 48,468
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@starsZE · 126,915
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
@L_OS_0 · 115,878
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
@ruutrgy · 141,503
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
@storykaligi · 38,135
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@ShatharatPal · 120,836
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@YemAware · 48,971
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
@N_N71 · 401,713
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@SSSS0_0 · 91,514
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@gf2023Unive · 81,367
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
@storykaligi_1 · 28,725
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@YVVNH · 29,292
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“-سبيشّل.” (@I_5_d), 6,782 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/I_5_d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.