خَـاص لـيـوم الجُـمـعـة🕌📿🤎.
Signed مجلد 100k | مسائي 🤍

Channel
@AS7RM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
159,810subscribers
-747 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001636102914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AS7RM |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AS7RM |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 159,810 | -105 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 159,915 | -121 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 160,036 | -124 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 160,160 | -106 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 160,266 | -136 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 160,402 | -89 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 160,491 | -66 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 160,557 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (21 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49,099 |
| Reactions total | 159 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91 | 67.9% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 23.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.48% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خَـاص لـيـوم الجُـمـعـة🕌📿🤎.
Signed مجلد 100k | مسائي 🤍
- قل وداعًا لنصف الاهتمام، لنصف الشوق، لنصف المشاعر، لنصف القلب، لنصف الحب ، إما أن يكون لك كل شيء, أو أنت لست بحاجة إلى أنصاف الأشياء .
💔1
Signed ˚。⋆☽︎𝓛𝓸𝓷𝓪 🦋🪻💉
لعشاق الادب ❤️🗞
Signed دعم مجرة الاربعاء
أحيانًا ما يتغيّر الإنسان لأنه ما عاد يحب… يتغيّر لأنه تعب من نفس الأشياء اللي كان يسكت عنها. تعب من الانتظار، من قلة السؤال، من الاهتمام اللي يجي بالمزاج، ومن شعور إنه لازم يطلب أبسط حقوقه العاطفية. ومع الوقت، تبدأ الأشياء الصغيرة اللي كانت تفرحه ما تعني له شيء، مو لأنه صار قاسي… لكن لأنه استهلك كل مشاعره وهو يحاول يحافظ على شيء ما كان يُحافظ عليه من الطرف الثاني. وهنا تكون المشكلة الحقيقية… لما يوصل الإنسان لمرحلة …
💔1
Signed ˚。⋆☽︎𝓛𝓸𝓷𝓪 🦋🪻💉
انت ولد ولا بنت .؟
Signed دعم 𝐊𝐀𝐘 100k
تعليــم اللغــة الانكليزية للمبتدئين🇺🇸...
Signed لستة أسومة¹••♪
العلاقة الحقيقيه والتي يجب أن تهتم بها هي علاقتك بالله سبحانه وتعالى...والله العظيم كل من حولك سيرحلون إما بشكل مؤقت بسبب ظروف معينه او بشكل دائم بسبب موت لاسمح الله او اي سبب آخر لذلك اهتم بعلاقتك بالله واعلم واعلمي وتذكر أن كل شيء في هذه الحياة ملك لله تعالى هو الذي يقرب ويبعد وهو الذي ييسر ويعسر وبيده كل مفاتيح السعاده فاضمن علاقتك به تضمن كل أسباب السعادة...
❤6
Signed ˚。⋆☽︎𝓛𝓸𝓷𝓪 🦋🪻💉
خَـاص لـيـوم الجُـمـعـة🕌📿🤎.
Signed مجلد 100k | مسائي 🤍
لعشاق الادب ❤️🗞
Signed دعم مجرة الاربعاء
🖤 أحيانًا تكون الجملة الأقسى… هي الأكثر وضوحًا. حين يقول لك شخص تحبه: «ما عاد أشتيك في حياتي» فلا تحاول أن تشرح له كم تحبه، ولا تذكّره بكل ما فعلته من أجله، ولا تحوّل حبك إلى معركة لإثبات أنك تستحق البقاء. الحب جميل… لكن أجمل ما فيه أن يكون اختيارًا متبادلًا، لا أن يصبح أحدهما متمسكًا والآخر يبحث عن طريق للخروج. قد يؤلمك أن تخسر شخصًا كنت تريده إلى آخر العمر، وقد تبقى داخلك أشياء كثيرة لم تُقل، لكن احترامك لكلمته …
💔5
Signed ˚。⋆☽︎𝓛𝓸𝓷𝓪 🦋🪻💉
طمأنينة لقلبك: 🍃🤍...
Signed لستة أسومة••♪
طمأنينة لقلبك: 🍃🤍...
Signed لستة أســومة "••♪
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @AS7RM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 644,443 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كتابات شغف | passion | ᥫ᭡” (@AS7RM), 159,810 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AS7RM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.