Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for La Peinture

Channel

La Peinture

@PeintureEtVie

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,378subscribers

+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348833116
TypeChannel
Username@PeintureEtVie
Created20 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PeintureEtVie

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,22514,37814,301.56 August 2026 — 14,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,225 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,234 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,242 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,250 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,260 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,265 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,264 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,274 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,278 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,282 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,279 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,282 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,280 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,313 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,316 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,313 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,316 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,311 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,314 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,316 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,320 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,340 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,348 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,349 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,362 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,357 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,363 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,373 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,372 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,368 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,378 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,202–14,401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:2114,378+10
16 Sept 2026, 06:0114,368-4
14 Sept 2026, 15:2114,372-1
13 Sept 2026, 01:5914,373+10
11 Sept 2026, 03:3814,363+6
8 Sept 2026, 07:5414,357-5
5 Sept 2026, 05:4114,362+13
2 Sept 2026, 01:3314,349+1
1 Sept 2026, 00:3814,348+8
30 Aug 2026, 22:3614,340+20
29 Aug 2026, 19:3314,320+4
28 Aug 2026, 22:1214,316+2
27 Aug 2026, 18:5714,314+3
26 Aug 2026, 18:4714,311-5
25 Aug 2026, 17:4414,316+1
24 Aug 2026, 15:1414,315+2
22 Aug 2026, 20:5914,313-3
21 Aug 2026, 09:5414,316+3
20 Aug 2026, 11:4614,313+33
19 Aug 2026, 14:2214,280first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 14,378 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held47 (20 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total9,390
Reactions total93
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 59s
Average length
17m 59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,048 reactions across 47 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤87883.8%
👍585.53%
💔454.29%
👀424.01%
👎252.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,300 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

زندگی مضحک قدیسان ⚪️ #Arts_Incohérents ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤14👎5

31 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,330 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

کتاب «زندگی مضحک قدیسان» اثر آلفرد لو پتی (عضو نامنسجم‌ها) در سال ۱۸۸۳ منتشر شد، کتاب حاوی کاریکاتورهایی علیه کلیسا و باورهای مسیحیت است. نویسنده با لحنی هجوآمیز، روایات مقدس و شرح‌حال قدیسین را مسخره قرار داده و چهرەهای مذهبی مقدس را نه به عنوان انسان‌هایی والامقام و روحانی، بلکه افرادی احمق، منحرف، دلقک یا فریبکار به تصویر کشیده است. ⚪️ #Arts_Incohérents ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤23👎8👍2👀1

28 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈2,320 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

مجموعه‌ای از نشریات و کاریکاتورهای فرانسوی، از ۱۸۴۷ تا ۱۸۷۰. ⚪️ #Arts_Incohérents ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤15

28 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,260 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

۵ کاتالوگ از نمایشگاه‌های سال ۱۸۸۳، ۱۸۸۴، ۱۸۸۶، ۱۸۸۷ و ۱۸۸۹. ⚪️ #Arts_Incohérents ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤14

28 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,180 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

از اونجایی که اصل آثار این جنبش از بین رفته یا در دسترس نیست، چند فایل پایین به تصور ما از آثار و فضای نمایشگاه‌ها کمک می‌کنند:

❤11

22 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈3,630 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

هنرمندان کاسب‌کاری که به بهانه‌ی واهیِ باستان‌شناسی، فلسفه و دیگر یاوه‌بافی‌های مختوم به پسوندِ «‌ـ‌شناسی»، در تولید هنرِ بی‌مایه و مبتذل متخصص شده‌اند، مثل کرها فریاد کشیدند. آن‌ها باور دارند «نامنسجم‌ها» خود را جدی گرفته‌اند و می‌خواهند محرابی در برابر محرابِ دیگر برپا کنند. می‌گویند که آن‌ها جز شوخی‌های زننده و بی‌نمک از عهده‌ی کاری برنمی‌آیند؛ گویی در میان نامنسجم‌ها هنرمندانِ واقعی یافت نمی‌شد، همان هنرمندانی که…

❤22👎2

22 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈2,980 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

هنر نامنسجم همان «شادمانی در عین حال بی‌پروایی» است که دوباره سر برآورده؛ شادمانی‌ای که می‌خواهد ما را چنان به خنده بیندازد که به تعبیر رابله، «بی‌قید و از ته دل قهقهه بزنیم»؛ در این قرنی که پر است از آدم‌های عصبی و پریشانِ بی‌حس و حال، که گویی بیهوش‌شان کرده‌اند و آدم‌های افسرده و ملال‌زده‌ی شوپنهاوری. - از کاتالوگ ۱۸۸۷ ⚪️ #Arts_Incohérents ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤17👎2

20 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈3,440 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026

‍ «هنرهای نامنسجم» "نقاشی، توسط افرادی که نقاشی بلد نیستند." در اکتبر ۱۸۸۲، «ژول لوی»، نویسنده و روزنامه‌نگار فرانسوی اولین نمایشگاه «هنرهای نامنسجم» را در خانه‌اش برگزار کرد؛ اکثر افراد نمایشگاه از نویسندگان، روزنامه‌نگاران و خلاصه افرادی که آموزش رسمی نقاشی نداشتند، بودند. نامنسجم‌ها در واقع نقطه تلاقی بین هنرهای تجسمی و ادبیات بود، از طرفی با امپرسیونیسم‌ها هم دوره بودند، امپرسیونیسم‌ها از ۱۸۷۴ تا ۱۸۸۶ نزدیک به ۸…

❤23

20 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈3,050 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Werner Herzog - Hearsay of the Soul 2012 ساخته‌ی ورنر هرتزوگ با چاپ‌های هرکول سگرز و موسیقی Ernst Reijseger. ⚪️ #Hercules_Segers ⚪️ @PeintureEtVie

❤9

20 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈3,190 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤13👎1

15 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈4,560 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026

فایل «مجموعه چاپ های هرکول سگرز» به‌روز رسانی شد. تصویرهای قبلی به ٧۴ چاپ از موزه رایکس محدود می‌شد اما در آپدیت اخیر تمامی چاپ های این هنرمند تهیه و بارگذاری شد.

❤27👍2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @PeintureEtVie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Paintings Place
@paintingsplace · 24,618
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
The Art Vault
@painting · 41,439
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Art and death.
@Art_death · 25,567
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
The Catcher in the Rye
@caulfild · 33,130
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
Classical Music
@classicmusic3 · 40,693
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
حرفه:هنرمند
@herfeh_honarmand · 21,863
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
ھنر تهی
@honartohi · 27,245
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
Honaragah(ادبیات،هنر،سینما)
@honaragah · 23,167
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
کانال هُنرواره | Art
@Honarrvareh · 30,711
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Annamorphin
@anamorphyn · 24,577
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
سینما پارادیـزو
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,757
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝙅𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝘼𝙇 مجله هنری
@ARTTJOURNAL · 35,028
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
کتابخانه معاصر
@Mser_12 · 28,918
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
CINEMAee | سینمایی
@Cinemaee_ir · 22,983
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
Private Art
@privateart · 49,663
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
کتاب گویای من
@ketabegooya_man · 27,700
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
مطالعات تئاتر️ 🕊️
@Theaterstudies · 34,282
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,738
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
باشگاه ادبیات
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,175
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
سینمای موج نو
@Cinema_New_Wave · 25,994
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
سرای دانایی
@llib7 · 26,045
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
فلسفه و جامعه‌شناسی
@Philosophy_files · 29,893
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Mohsen Namjoo | محسن نامجو
@Official_MohsenNamjoo · 44,898
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
🔸فروغ_فرخزاد🔸
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,058
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“La Peinture” (@PeintureEtVie), 14,378 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PeintureEtVie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.