Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aktuelle Energien - Sonnenstürme, Schumann-Frequenz und Zeitqualitäten

Channel

Aktuelle Energien - Sonnenstürme, Schumann-Frequenz und Zeitqualitäten

@aktuelleenergien

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,237subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661375318
TypeChannel
Username@aktuelleenergien
Created20 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aktuelleenergien

Growth

12,22012,23712,228.56 August 2026 — 12,229 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,231 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,228 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,229 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,232 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,234 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,237 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 10 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,217–12,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:3812,237+3
14 Aug 2026, 15:5612,234+6
13 Aug 2026, 04:5612,228-4
12 Aug 2026, 04:3312,232+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:5812,229+9
9 Aug 2026, 09:1212,220-8
8 Aug 2026, 07:4812,228-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:0212,231+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:4612,229first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 12,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,450
127 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
127
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held127 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total310,601
Reactions total8,573
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 10s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,573 reactions across 127 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,75855.5%
🙏1,57018.3%
🦄7859.16%
❤‍🔥3794.42%
💯2873.35%
👍2633.07%
🥰1681.96%
😍1131.32%
🔥1021.19%
🕊670.782%
🤩310.362%
🤗160.187%
👏150.175%
🤝40.047%
🎉30.035%
😁30.035%
😢30.035%
🙈20.023%
🤔20.023%
🤓10.012%
1 further kind10.012%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC497 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssgeosurveyPhoto

#Earthquake M 6.9 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

🙏71

15 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC571 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ich lasse all mein Wirken bedingungslos von Herzen fließen 💞 Zu mir fließen lassen kannst du per PayPal: [email protected] 🙏✨ Oder Überweisung (Daten per PN auf Nachfrage) Oder Patreon. Dort kannst du mit einem kleinen regelmäßigen Betrag unterstützen. https://www.patreon.com/Lindenherz DANKE 🌬️✨ Lindenherz

🙏137

15 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC622 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👆🏻 der Text ist von 2023… wow ihr Lieben es ist nun 2026 und gerade realisiere ich mal wieder ganz bewusst dass ich seit über drei Jahren jeden Tag hier Abgleiche und Einflüsse zur aktuellen Energie teile. Mein Kanal ist mittlerweile so gewachsen und viele von euch sind schon lange Zeit konstant dabei. Wenn ich eure Kommentare lese fühle ich euch und kenne eure Energie. Manchen darf ich jetzt sehr nah an meinem hei

41🙏7

15 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC713 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Sonne erklärt: Die Sonne durchläuft wie bereits erklärt einen durchschnittlich 11 Jahre langen Zyklus (zwischen 8 und 13 Jahren war alles dabei), wobei man nicht genau weiß WIE lang ein Zyklus letztendlich ist. Dies wird nachträglich festgelegt nachdem man zum Beispiel bemerkt dass die Sonne wieder an Aktivität zulegt, weiß man rückwirkend dass man das solare Minimum gerade erlebt hat. Und umgekehrt: nimmt die Erupt

🙏8💯1

15 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC722 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👆🏻 die Wahrnehmung teile ich liebe Tatjana, das aktuelle Maximum neigt sich ganz langsam. Ich teile noch mal meine lang zurück liegenden Grundtexte zum Sonnenzyklus.

10

15 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC584 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychicmediumtatjanatwimflames

Ich habe das Gefühl das wir irgendwie aus dem Sonnen Maximum raus sind😬🤓 Schön wäre es ja Wer noch? PS Hiermit meine ich die häufigen X Flares und Sonnenstürme

🙏62

15 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC574 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychicmediumtatjanatwimflames

Einen zauberhaften Start ins Wochenende meine geliebten Seelensterne🥰 Wir befinden uns zwischen den Finsternissen. Symptome der körperlichen Ebene -Reinigung/ Entgiftung deines Systems; -Schnupfen -tränende Augen 👀 /das Gefühl Sand unter den Lidern zu haben, Jucken oder brennen -vermehrte Darm und Blasen Entleerung -extreme Nacken und Rückenverspannungen, teilweise mit Schmerzen -das Gefühl von Muskelkater -

31🙏5👍4

15 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC670 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @SonjaArielvonStadenVideo

Video, posted without a caption

9

15 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,970 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌍 Weltweit hohes Erdbebenniveau Acht Beben über Magnitude 5 - die meisten Indonesien - seit Mitternacht. Das 7.7er und das in Spanien waren kurz davor deshalb sind sie in Bild 3 nicht aufgeführt

🙏369👍2

15 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,520 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssgeosurveyPhoto

Notable #earthquake M 5.0 SPAIN

🙏225

15 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,330 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssgeosurveyPhoto

The earthquake in Indonesia has been revised to magnitude 7.7. Strong aftershocks, potentially reaching magnitude 6 are possible.

🙏193

15 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,630 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssgeosurveyPhoto

#earthquake M 7.6 FLORES REGION, INDONESIA

🙏244

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @aktuelleenergien. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

Spürst du noch einen Sonnensturm kommen heute?

  1. Nein das scheint es gewesen zu sein14%
  2. Ja da kommt noch was meine ich60%
  3. Ich kann das noch nicht zuordnen26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,571 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell
@silkeschaefer · 122,306
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
drmichaelnehls
@DrMichaelNehls · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aktuelle Energien - Sonnenstürme, Schumann-Frequenz und Zeitqualitäten” (@aktuelleenergien), 12,237 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aktuelleenergien.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.