Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Margaretha Brunner 💖 Lichtpost - Informationen aus der geistigen Welt

@lichtpost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,322subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291519390
TypeChannel
Username@lichtpost
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lichtpost

Growth

3,3223,3253,323.57 August 2026 — 3,325 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,322 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,322–3,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:243,322-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:003,325no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:513,325first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.9%
avg views ÷ 3,322 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total43,481
Reactions total1,605
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 15s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,720 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,36179.1%
🙏1277.38%
🥰854.94%
👍472.73%
🕊170.988%
💯160.93%
👏140.814%
😇110.64%
🔥90.523%
😍70.407%
💘60.349%
❤‍🔥50.291%
👌50.291%
🤔30.174%
🤩30.174%
🦄30.174%
👎10.058%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,720reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC761 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/CuZ8VsGcqDk?is=V39-1A_zuvctZ49y Wie versprochen noch ein paar Inputs zu Cern und dem Teilchenbeschleuniger bzw welche Frequenzen da wirken Ich poste euch später noch eine Grafik, die ich mit der KI erstellt hab, zum besseren Verständnis/ anschaulich erklärt 😊

40👍2🥰2😇2👌1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

6 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,430 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Wie leicht wir unsere eigene Wahrnehmung an Autoritäten abgeben Ufos, wer sind sie ? Was machen die Videos mit mir? Namen erklären / ersetzen keine Erfahrung Echte Erfahrung oder wiederholst du Begriffe Je größer die Geheimnisse..desto kleiner sollte unser Ego werden Denn es ist in Ordnung, manche Dinge einfach nicht zu wissen.. ✨✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

77🙏13👏6👍2🥰2

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,060 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Wolken?;) nicht denken..analysieren Sondern spüren..Was ihr wahrnehmt..Hinter dem Bild, dass wir sehen Ok, zu einfach 😁 präzisiere Frage an euch: Was könnte der Grund sein, d Ufos wie Wolken aussehen? ✨✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

43🥰7🤩2

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,920 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Spannende Flugbahn für einen Meteoriten ;) ✨✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

25👍5🥰1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,740 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Aufnahme aus Helsinki 2026 ✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

21👍4🥰2

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,690 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ebenso Teil der vom Pentagon veröffentlichten Dokumente ✨✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

18👍3🔥1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,570 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video von der Pentagon Seite.. ✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

21👍3🤔3🥰1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

4 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,640 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bevor ich euch eine Sprachnachricht zu dem Video aus Budapest aufnehm, noch ein paar andere spannende Aufnahmen Zwei davon sind offiziell vom Pentagon veröffentlicht, im Rahmen der UAP Veröffentlichungen Mittlerweile gibt's einiges an Videos, Berichten auf der offiziellen Pentagon Seite , viele jedoch oft recht Akt ( 1960, 1970 usw) man kann sich dann ausmalen, wie viel Material es da inoffiziell gibt und wenn wir d

30😍4🔥2👍1🦄1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

2 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,150 views146 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BF77tzxAWvI?is=aFTVWxYNt9q4idwa Heute gibt's mal ein allgemeines Video zum August und der Energie des Monats in den kommenden Tagen nehm ich noch eines auf zum Thema CERN und was es mit Spaltung und Chaos bzw der Erschaffung von Licht auf sich hat.. Ebenso schau ich, d ich euch in den kommenden Tagen eine Sprachnachricht zu dem gestern geposteten Video aus Budapest aufnehm :) Ich freu mich wie imme

115🙏14🥰8🕊4😍3🔥1😇1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

1 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈2,030 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Anscheinend am 30.6.2026 in Budapest aufgenommen Wer fühlt was? Echt oder Fake Wie reagiert euer Körper ? WICHTIG: FÜHLEN beim anschauen...Und bemerken, wenn euer Kopf reinreden anfängt Denn meistens schaltet sich bei Videos/ Bildern sofort unser Verstand dazu und liefert Erklärungen Wichtig ist aber das Gefühl..nicht, was der Verstand uns beim betrachten erklärt ;) ✨✨✨✨ https://t.me/lichtpost

41🥰4🙏2🤩1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

1 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,910 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ihr Lieben, Willkommen im August:) Ich wollt heut ein Youtube Video aufnehmen, aber dann kamen so viele verschiedene Themen: der Unterschied zw Cern und dem Teilchenbeschleuniger in China ( jap auch die Chinesen haben so ein Teil ;) allerdings anders als Cern) Sonnenfinsternis, div astrologische Konstellationen Energien im August, Feuer uvm Gestern haben wir uns Steven Spielbergs Film Disclosure Day angeschaut.. u

45🥰3🙏3

Signed Margaretha Brunner

28 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,680 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026

3. Teil des Fragen Zyklus ✨️„Lösen sich wirklich alle alten Strukturen, Traumata, Energien, Muster, Ahnenthemen aus uns und unseren Zellen? Müssen wir dafür was tun oder geht das von alleine?"✨️ Oft wird diese Frage mit einem großen JA beantwortet..ich schreib mal, wie ich es wirklich erlebe/ beobachte. Meine ehrliche Antwort ist..Nein. Nicht alles löst sich einfach auf und ich halte diese Vorstellung/ Versprechun

83🙏12👎1💘1

Signed Margaretha Brunner

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lichtpost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,775 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Margaretha Brunner 💖 Lichtpost - Informationen aus der geistigen Welt” (@lichtpost), 3,322 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lichtpost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.