9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,732–18,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:12
18,807
-13
12 Aug 2026, 01:32
18,820
-8
10 Aug 2026, 23:38
18,828
-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:22
18,829
+8
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
18,821
+45
8 Aug 2026, 01:22
18,776
+9
7 Aug 2026, 02:45
18,767
+22
6 Aug 2026, 06:15
18,745
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:08
18,745
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
54.3%
avg views ÷ 18,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
34 (24 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
346,900
Reactions total
15,124
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈249
Videos
≈30
Links
≈1,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
14,012 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,237
73.1%
👍
1,734
12.4%
💯
1,324
9.45%
🔥
262
1.87%
👏
181
1.29%
🤩
81
0.578%
⚡
72
0.514%
✍
53
0.378%
😍
33
0.236%
🥰
26
0.186%
😘
9
0.064%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال القاضي: لم يظهر عاطف نجيب الندم والاعتذار..
وهل رأيتم واحداً من هذه العصابة القذرة وحاضنتها اعتذر أوندم ولو بالظاهر على بحار الدماء، والمدن التي حولوها ركاماً، والاطفال الذين صهروهم بالكيماوي، وأبشع معتقلات في العصر الحديث، وثروات بلاد انتهبوها ستين سنة؟
بل والله لو سنحت لهم الفرصة الآن لفعلوا أكثر من جرائمهم الماضية.
هؤلاء بلا دين ولا خلق ولا فطرة ولا إنسانية ولا كرامة...
لا تتعاطفوا معهم ولو ذرة، ولا تركنوا إلي…
"تعلموا من الهند، فيها مئات الأديان ولانسمع تحريضاً طائفياً" هكذا يقول فيصل القاسم..
ليت شعري أما سمع عن مآسي المسلمين في الهند من هدم للمساجد وحرق للبيوت وسحق للوجود..
أما سمع أن أكبر أقلية في العالم ٢٧٠ مليون مسلم في الهند تمارس عليهم كافة أنواع التعذيب والتمييز والقمع..
إن المسلمين في الهند أكثر من أقليات العالم كله، لكنهم يسحقون بصمت وتعتيم، وكثير من الإعلاميين الذين يشككون الناس بدينهم شركاء في هذه الجريمة.
http…
القضية مع راغب علامة وأمثاله ليست قضية ثورة وتأييد للنظام فحسب.
هي أزمة أخلاق وفطرة ورجولة وحياء يخلقها هؤلاء في أوساط الشباب والشابات.
وإن خديعة الجيل بتصدير هؤلاء الذين يفسدون القلوب والفطرة والدين أشد من غش الناس في طعامهم وشرابهم المفضي إلى فساد أجسادهم وحياتهم.
أنصح إخواني المسؤولين بمراقبة الله تعالى والنظر في عواقب ما قد يظنونه مصلحة أو دفع شر باستضافتهم.
https://t.me/Albacore1
ما زاد الوقوف مع الباطل في عمر عاطف لحظةً ولا في رزقه ذرة، وما نقص الوقوف مع الحق من آجال أهل الحق ولا رزقهم،
وكم من عاطف نجيب سيجتمع له خزي الدنيا وعذاب الآخرة.
https://t.me/Albacore1
ليت كثيراً من الطلاب الذين ضمنوا نجاح الدنيا يتعلمون الأحكام الدينية التي لايجوز لمسلم أن يجهلها، فوالله إن الرسوب فيها شديد، وإن الخسران لمن أهملها محتّمٌ أكيد.
https://t.me/Albacore1
في بعض مراحل الجهاد لما كنت أرى الأعداد الهائلة من المجاهدين، وفينا نخب تناطح هممها السحاب، وامتدت السيطرة لتشمل أكثر سوريا؛ كنت أقول: كيف سمحت الدول لهذه القوة أن تتشكل، وهي لن تملك إضعافها من جديد؟
وما هي إلا سنة أو سنتان حتى انقلب كل ذلك؛
فقدنا نخب شبابنا لأسباب كثيرة..
انكسرت عزائم كثير، وضعفت هممهم..
حوصرنا في بقعة جغرافية كانت تضيق علينا كل أشهر..
كان ذلك بذنوبنا وبمكر الدول.
ما أريد قوله: لا تغتروا كثيراً بما …
يسكت المنافقون عن المنكر، وينشغلون بالكلام عن طريقة الإنكار.
يسلقون الناصحين بألسنة حداد تحت ستار الحكمة والرفق، فإذا جاء الباطل والبدعة والفساد أدهنوا وصمتوا صمت أهل القبور.
فلاتراهم يتكلمون إلا في أساليب الناصحين وطرائق المصلحين.
https://t.me/Albacore1
نسبة التحرش في باريس ولندن وواشنطن توشك أن تصل إلى 100٪.
ويأتي ممثل يعتاش على الكذب والفساد وبيع دينه وشرفه ليتكلم عن سوء ظاهرة التحرش عندنا والمجتمع الذكوري.
https://t.me/Albacore1
في منتصف دمشق: اختلاط إلى درجة التراص بين الرجال والنساء.
اجتماع على تفاهة ورقص وغناء.
منكر شنيع، واستجلاب لسخط الله تعالى، وصرف للشباب عن المعالي إلى التفاهات، وتضييع لحقوق التمكين.
أتمنى من إخواني المشايخ وطلبة العلم في جميع المحافظات من مختلف المدارس والاتجاهات أن يقوموا بتوعية الناس وإقامة شعيرة الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر، وإلا:
فإن سفينتنا ستغرق، وريحنا ستذهب، وقوتنا ستتزع، ونعود أذلة خائبين بما كسبت أيدينا…
لكل أمٍّ تعبت مع أولادها، وسهرت الليالي الطوال لأجل أن ترى نجاحهم وتفوقهم.. احرصي على ربطِ أولادك بالدار الآخرة، بابتغاء ما عند الله، بنهضة الأمة كي تفرحي في الآخرة كما فرحتِ الآن، وليكون سهرك وتعبك وهمك وقلقك جهاداً في سبيل الله.
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCK2riHLHQUkewwx30e
❤314👍48💯21👏5🔥4⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @Albacore1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 28,335 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عبد القادر البكور” (@Albacore1), 18,807 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Albacore1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
