Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TELL更新通知频道

@APATCHK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,593subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195143836
TypeChannel
Username@APATCHK
Description无广更新频道:https://t.me/TellCheatN 中转群:https://t.me/APACTH 新交流群:https://t.me/TellCheat 配置分享群:https://t.me/+bwVpRdG1rss4MTI1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APATCHK

Growth

12,59312,62412,608.57 August 2026 — 12,624 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,624 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,615 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,613 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,608 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,599 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,593 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,588–12,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:1312,593-6
11 Aug 2026, 18:1512,599-9
10 Aug 2026, 17:1212,608-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:3312,613-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:3312,615-9
7 Aug 2026, 17:3012,624no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2612,624first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.09%
avg views ÷ 12,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
641
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.351%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total7,696
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
70
Videos
2
Links
100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1672.7%
522.7%
👎14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @A6neiheFile

解密已经更新 适配全部机型全部设备 无需专属驱动 最新算法解密,bug留言 国际服并未同步解密更新 A6的驱动已经被特征,请不要使用加载

👍1

10 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC490 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

Sy王者正式服美化8.11_0144.zip 更新内容 🟢修复登录失败重试无效的bug 🟢修复心跳因网络原因导致的失效 🟢修复部分人补全特效没效果 🟢修复巅峰历程没效果 🟢修复因开启星传说导致的模型隐身 🟢修复偶尔加载界面卡死问题 🟢修复李白岁月剑心和谪仙大招原皮特效,包括凯的的几个,还有很多具体看频道置顶,基本都修了... ✔️美化or自瞄订阅链接 https://816.jytos.cn/shop/RGVJ30K7 修复个启动时间过长和部分人误杀kill的问题,重新下载一下

👍54

5 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC846 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

HJ和平防高解密端dd 解密流畅无任何卡顿 通过处理云下发达到解密效果 不会像内核解密那样卡顿 物资透无效 端口已过高风险检测(俗称防高 不是百分之百) 降低行为问题 而降低行为拉闸 防随机10年 无任何禁网问题 端口好不好用只有用了才知道 海角内核收代理 无需任何代理费 ❗️内有算法无后 ❗️断点无后 ❗️无减伤追踪 ❗️仿生自瞄 广角等 注:本产品购买后为卡密发货 因而不予任何退货退款理由 卡网:https://q3g.66url.cn/XCp 官方频道:https://t.me/HJDKNH QQ群聊:1038213278

👎1

4 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC438 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @A6neiheFile

🅰️6️⃣ 【A6 王者荣耀】🥰 公益 纯算法解密 ⚠️纯外部算法解密 不修改任何内存 ⚠️ ✅不三方 ✅不异常 ✅无视加密 📲丝滑流畅 Ui简洁好看 支持全安卓 ✅支持全英雄内核触摸自瞄 动态算法自瞄 ✅支持全皮肤美化 一键体验全皮肤 ✔️官方频道 ❤️官方交流

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC924 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @yuzhou86Photo

8月1,一个版本稳定到姥姥家

👍2

1 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC392 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @A6neiheFile

🅰️6️⃣ 【A6 王者荣耀】🥰 公益 纯算法解密 ⚠️纯外部算法解密 不修改任何内存 ⚠️ ✅不三方 ✅不异常 ✅无视加密 📲丝滑流畅 Ui简洁好看 支持全安卓 ✅支持全英雄内核触摸自瞄 动态算法自瞄 ✅支持全皮肤美化 一键体验全皮肤 ✔️官方频道 ❤️官方交流

1👍1

1 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC852 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

时间导航 ⭐时间无广频道:@TIMEPD ⭐时间交流群:@time_pd_chat ⭐广告联系:@gdfw7781 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 时间辅助下载地址 ➡️ https://t.me/time_pd/822 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kairos驱动下载地址 ➡️ https://t.me/time_pd_driver/3 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 疑难杂症解答 ➡️ https://t.me/time_pd/1545 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 以上均为云更新💭 无需重复下载(特殊情况除外)

👍3

1 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC680 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @xyyds6

😀😀😀😀 @zjzj137 X内部版 40/天。 纯算法。依旧稳定奔放。 最新解密全网独家,因为稳定所以贵。无30/10。 题卡联系管理员 @CiCi0513 @baoshen6 p卡联系 @zjzj137

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC710 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @XFchartFile

XFJCC记牌器-v460.更新内容: 1.新增自动卡牌[开启后可自动识别牌库进行卡牌 比如说 对手A某个棋子子已经有7张了可自动进行锁定拿牌] 2.修复对手预测和网页共享 3.优化脚下显示逻辑[只有在备战时间的时候显示] 4.优化整体hub点击屏幕显示穿透 5.修复闪退 6.修复验证问题 7.修复自动拿牌bug 8.修复自动解绑失效 9.自动对齐重新适配mumu电脑手机和平板 ️ 💙一键了解XF赞助

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC958 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

海角老牌瓦端口 持续奔放 防禁网 防检测10 解密 大大降低行为和观察期概率 17500解密密钥处理 全网独家 老牌无需多言 卡网:https://816.jytos.cn/shop/JK6F7SWS 交流群:612736002

30 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC664 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

HJ和平防高解密端dd 解密流畅无任何卡顿 通过处理云下发达到解密效果 不会像内核解密那样卡顿 物资透无效 端口已过高风险检测(俗称防高 不是百分之百) 降低行为问题 而降低行为拉闸 防随机10年 无任何禁网问题 端口好不好用只有用了才知道 海角内核收代理 无需任何代理费 ❗️内有算法无后 ❗️断点无后 ❗️无减伤追踪 ❗️仿生自瞄 广角等 注:本产品购买后为卡密发货 因而不予任何退货退款理由 卡网:https://q3g.66url.cn/XCp 官方频道:https://t.me/HJDKNH QQ群聊:1038213278

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC477 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yuzhou86Photo

30号读取版,月底还是稳定 真没办法

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @APATCHK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TELL更新通知频道” (@APATCHK), 12,593 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APATCHK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.