Chris & Nick had a really important discussion yesterday on the bond market. Whether you trade currencies, commodities, or stocks - this is the one market to rule them all! https://youtu.be/NyH6Y-gDfsM
👍4❤2

Channel
@A1TradingFXAnalysis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,256subscribers
+752 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001228490587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @A1TradingFXAnalysis |
| Description | Join for daily trade ideas, market analysis, and bonus giveaways! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/A1TradingFXAnalysis |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 44,256 | +101 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 44,155 | -5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 44,160 | +108 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 44,052 | +37 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 44,015 | +66 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 43,949 | +39 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 43,910 | +31 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 43,879 | +58 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 43,821 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 43,820 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 43,835 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 43,846 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 43,826 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 43,812 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 43,797 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 43,804 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 43,801 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 43,811 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 43,828 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 43,851 | first reading |
203 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 203 (30 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 330,340 |
| Reactions total | 2,532 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5,098 reactions across 202 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,076 | 60.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,124 | 22.0% | |
| 🔥 | 571 | 11.2% | |
| 😁 | 107 | 2.10% | |
| 🫡 | 85 | 1.67% | |
| 👀 | 39 | 0.765% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 0.647% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 0.628% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 0.294% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.216% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.059% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.039% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 202 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Chris & Nick had a really important discussion yesterday on the bond market. Whether you trade currencies, commodities, or stocks - this is the one market to rule them all! https://youtu.be/NyH6Y-gDfsM
👍4❤2
USD/JPY Daily Chart Hoping we get an actual intervention out of this. I'm patiently waiting to start my USD/JPY long campaign! There could be a world where the Fed outpaces BoJ in rate hikes. This would increase the carry trade trend and provide me larger positive swaps! If you want updates / alerts of new trades being taken, join our VIP group here! Today is the last day for 40% off. — Alan
👍19❤4
The Yen Bounced Because Trump Flagged It, and Japan Validated it USD/JPY is pulling back after the yen snaps a five-session losing streak. The catalyst: Japan's finance minister Katayama said Trump raised concerns about the weak yen directly with PM Takaichi at the UN summit, and Takaichi agreed an undervalued yen is a problem. When a US president openly flags yen weakness, joint intervention gets much easier to ju…
👍10❤5
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A country's currency strengthens 15% against its trading partners over a year. Which sector typically feels it first?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤16👍3
EURGBP Daily Chart Classic previous support turned resistance. With a cherry on top being the 200 Day SMA acting as another layer of overhead resistance. This trade to the short-side looks pretty clean, with the EdgeFinder's Eco Surprise Index currently supporting the GBP over the Euro. EURGBP was getting a bearish reading earlier this week but is now in neutral territory. I'll be waiting for a little more premium…
❤20👍7
Gold Now Holds Firm Even as the 2-Year Nears 5% Gold this afternoon is reacting nicely to the 0.618 retracement at 4,242, the same positive reaction you saw on September 16 when Warsh was surprisingly hawkish. Even in that moment, which should have been super bearish for gold, buyers stepped in at the 0.618. It is happening again. Gold is holding despite the 2-year and 10-year finishing up+ 3% yesterday, with the 2…
❤22👍11🔥3
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day Mortgage rates rise sharply over six months. Where does the pressure usually show up first?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👍2😁2
Russell 2000 (RTY) Daily Chart The Russell, home to small-caps (companies with floating debt loads and heavy reliance on variable bank loans), is getting close to pivotal support and the 200-day SMA. If it loses those key levels and yields stay elevated, companies in the Russell really start to hurt. I don't like shorting equities but this looks clean. If you want updates / alerts of new trades being taken, join …
❤15👍6🔥3
Guys and Gals, The 2-Year Is Pushing Toward 5% The 2-year yield is jumping today, at 4.883% and getting close to the 4.9 handle. This is very interesting, because we may be about to see the 2-year at 5%. A 2-year near 5% is a signal that Fed tightening is becoming a real possibility, not just something that may come. The 2-year tracks Fed policy directly, so it moving here is the market pricing an actual hiking pat…
👍26🔥8😱4
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A stock is up 8% on the day and still climbing. A trader buys "before it runs further." What's the main risk?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤9👍7
EURUSD Daily Chart I recently went short the Euro. But we'll see if DXY continues the momentum to the upside. Some things that support the trade: US Yields elevated VS Europes, CME Fedwatch still showing potential hikes on the horizon, divergence in EUR vs USD on Eco Surprise Index, and of course an EdgeFinder bearish score of -7. We have some EUR economic data early in the AM so stay tuned in the discord for any …
❤30🔥9👀3
DXY Now Clears 100.5 as More Hikes Come Into View The dollar index is breaking out this afternoon clearing the 100.5 resistance, the recent July high. And the breakout seems to have some follow-through. The reason is the Fed positioned the market for more hikes. Personally I do not fully believe it, but you have to respect yields and history. History says a one-and-done hike rarely happens. A first hike after a pro…
👍20❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @A1TradingFXAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 41 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A country's currency strengthens 15% against its trading partners over a year. Which sector typically feels it first?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day Mortgage rates rise sharply over six months. Where does the pressure usually show up first?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A stock is up 8% on the day and still climbing. A trader buys "before it runs further." What's the main risk?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day When the Fed cuts rates, the dollar always weakens.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A trader plans a 3:1 trade, but the market drifts and they enter late at a worse price. What happened to the trade's reward-to-risk?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔Closing Bell - Question of the Day An inverse head and shoulders completes with a neckline break. Where do traders commonly project the initial target?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A1 TRADING | Indices, Commodities, Forex, Futures” (@A1TradingFXAnalysis), 44,256 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/A1TradingFXAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.