btc also not immediately breaking that 81200 resistance levels... but below 76000 there is a lot of support zones,,, i will mark that also,,
🔥1

Channel
@TradersAdda360officials
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,345subscribers
-230 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001754650080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TradersAdda360officials |
| Description | In this channel you will learn best price action trading.I don't use any indicators as i feel all indicators are lagging.Having experience for more than 8 years in trading various instruments,I am sharing my knowledge for the benefit of others. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TradersAdda360officials |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 11,345 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 11,357 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 11,365 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 11,371 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 11,374 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 11,388 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 11,400 | -18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 11,418 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 11,431 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 11,439 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 11,450 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 11,460 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 11,475 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 11,488 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 11,498 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 11,517 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 11,532 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 11,540 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 11,548 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 11,561 | first reading |
82 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 71 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (1 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,322 |
| Reactions total | 167 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
167 reactions across 71 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 55 | 32.9% | |
| 🥰 | 45 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 16.8% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 10.2% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.99% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.80% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
btc also not immediately breaking that 81200 resistance levels... but below 76000 there is a lot of support zones,,, i will mark that also,,
🔥1
nasdaq rejection is very clear.... but it will retest those resistance levels again and again then chance for fall like support levels reaction.. if it broke completely that resistance zone then chance for further major upmove. rightnow its in control with bears....
🥰1
traders on friday after breaking its final support market fell more than 600 pips... its not a heavy fall.👉 but price probably take 4427 & 4415 levels as supports and chance for retracing maximum 550 pips above during asian secession itselt. so if market falls till that level try to buy in those zones and set min 270 to max 500 pips as target...👉👉it will happen during asian secession itselt./////
🔥1
traders these are two final support zones institutionals targeted.. exactly during news they pick these two levels... its final levels .. price will not return .. probably price fly ///i m not interested in taking any position right now... 500 pips enough...
🥰1
traders i dont think this news impact this much effective....its very high impact... i m totally an idiot ..even after hitting 570 pips profit i didnt closed... becoz of sudden reversal i finally closed only at 50 pips profit... which is total damage to that buy... later on two support levels i took around 450 pips.. finally closing 500 pips profit together. finally i realised too much of greed is injurious to our pr…
❤1🔥1
traders major news plus FED CHAIRMAN SPeaks.... manage and safeguard your profit////
🥰1
Traders today high chance of Trending and Volatility .... 👉👉very Very Narrow CPR formation,,, 👉👉Price broke VWAP from lower band to UPPER BAND.. 👉👉1 week channel formation with more than 4 secession volume liqudity... everything going to 👉👉burnout today//// min chance of 1000 pips movement...which side we cant predict.. but my observation is upside///
🔥1🥰1
traders targeting those two zones first//
👍4
traders welcome back
🔥2
https://www.youtube.com/live/sU3EtE5y18c?si=ExPZkh4huzuWWIig
traders i already entered one position during first fall around 4573 and set target 300 pips but didnt hit fell completely .. then add another position at 4566 ..after market absorbing all liquidity with full energy it finally took off .. both closed one at 310 pips and another 385 pips;... its very easy level traders since yesterday i confidently took only buys based on NASDAQ chart.. its price action given same co…
🏆1👍1🥰1
traders setting max target till 400 pips for this buy
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @TradersAdda360officials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TradersAdda360 (Official)” (@TradersAdda360officials), 11,345 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradersAdda360officials.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.