Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 100 days, net +82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,201–8,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 21:55
8,319
+7
9 Nov 2026, 11:45
8,312
+5
6 Nov 2026, 11:08
8,307
+13
3 Nov 2026, 20:56
8,294
+11
31 Oct 2026, 17:56
8,283
+9
28 Oct 2026, 10:51
8,274
-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:48
8,275
+13
21 Oct 2026, 21:35
8,262
+4
15 Oct 2026, 09:45
8,258
+13
12 Oct 2026, 10:15
8,245
+3
5 Oct 2026, 07:16
8,242
+18
27 Sept 2026, 05:58
8,224
-8
18 Sept 2026, 06:41
8,232
+13
10 Sept 2026, 07:20
8,219
-10
5 Sept 2026, 10:17
8,229
-2
1 Sept 2026, 07:05
8,231
+15
29 Aug 2026, 00:07
8,216
-1
26 Aug 2026, 06:11
8,217
-13
23 Aug 2026, 04:05
8,230
-7
19 Aug 2026, 11:27
8,237
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.47%
avg views ÷ 8,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
538
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
84 (8 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
31,739
Reactions total
610
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
55s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
897 reactions across 83 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
364
40.6%
👍
169
18.8%
🔥
130
14.5%
😎
75
8.36%
👌
52
5.80%
💯
44
4.91%
🆒
28
3.12%
😍
23
2.56%
🫡
10
1.11%
💔
1
0.111%
🤷
1
0.111%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 917 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 59 posts held from the last 30 days (1.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🥇 XAUUSD — 📈DESCENDING STRUCTURE FAVOURS ANOTHER LEG LOWER
#XAUUSD remains in a clear downward structure after breaking below the previous support zone. The current rebound could extend toward nearby resistance before sellers resume control and push gold 📉toward the lower channel boundary.
🥇 Gold rebounds after hitting a one-year low — Bargain hunting lifted bullion around 1% on Friday, but prices remain down more …
🇳🇿🇺🇸 NZDUSD — 📈SUPPORT TEST COULD TRIGGER A BULLISH RECOVERY
#NZDUSD continues to trade within a descending structure, but price is approaching a strong support zone where buyers have previously stepped in. A final dip toward trendline support could trigger a rebound 📈toward the former resistance area.
🇳🇿 New Zealand housing market deteriorates — October home sales fell 24% year-on-year, highlighting growing weakne…
4 days 🥇GOLD VIP RESULTS 🎯️️️️️️+1017 PIPS
🪙XAUUSD +566.4 pips
🪙XAUUSD +227.5 pips
🪙XAUUSD +794.1 pips
🪙XAUUSD +501.3 pips
🪙XAUUSD +571.8 pips
❌XAUUSD -210.8 pips
❌XAUUSD -220.1 pips
❌XAUUSD -210.6 pips
You still have a whole day ahead—which you can use FOR PROFIT
———————
📩for VIP SIGNALS
🥇 XAUUSD — 📈DESCENDING CHANNEL KEEPS SELLERS IN CONTROL
#XAUUSD remains under pressure inside a descending channel after breaking below the previous support zone. A corrective rebound toward the upper channel boundary could attract fresh sellers before another decline 📉toward the lower support area.
🥇 Gold extends its losing streak — Bullion has fallen for a third consecutive session as dollar strength and rising r…
🇺🇸🇯🇵 USDJPY — 📈UPPER CHANNEL RESISTANCE COULD TRIGGER A REVERSAL
#USDJPY is testing the upper boundary of its rising channel after a strong rally. Rejection here could lead to another bounce before sellers push the pair toward the lower support zone.
🇺🇸 Dollar hits a 19-month high — Hot US inflation and hawkish Fed comments have strengthened the dollar, keeping upward pressure on USDJPY.
🇯🇵 Japan warns of renewed …
INSIDE DeGRAM🤑VIP GROUP
⭐️4+ signals every day
⭐️Entry, SL & TP
⭐️Risk management
💰 Your job is simple: JUST FOLLOW THE SETUP and MAKE PROFIT
———————
📩for VIP SIGNALS
🤑VIP GROUP IN ACTION! CLOSED SIGNALS
Here are three examples of the kind of perfect entries we deliver in our private signals: all three reached TP3 successfully today!
✅USDCAD +103 PIPS
✅USDCHF +108 PIPS
✅USDCHF +107 PIPS
And that's the DIFFERENCE - You just follow the signals and MAKE PROFIT
———————
📩for VIP SIGNALS
🥇XAUUSD — 📈RISING SUPPORT COULD FUEL ANOTHER RECOVERY
#XAUUSD is consolidating above rising trendline support after a sharp selloff, while descending resistance continues to cap the upside. A retest of the support zone could attract buyers and set up 📈another advance toward the upper trendline.
🇺🇸 Gold plunges nearly 3% after US CPI — October inflation exceeded forecasts, lifting the dollar and Treasury yields and …
🇬🇧🇯🇵 GBPJPY — 📈RESISTANCE REJECTION POINTS TOWARD SUPPORT
#GBPJPY is recovering after a sharp selloff, but buyers remain below the previous resistance zone. A short-lived rebound toward resistance could attract sellers again, sending the pair 📉back toward the rising support line.
🇯🇵 Yen gains on renewed safe-haven demand — Hawkish Fed rhetoric has triggered demand for the yen, adding downside pressure to GBPJPY.
⚠…
❤5🔥3💯2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @degramchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lingrid Forex Signals @lingridchannel · 20,995 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) @VasilyTrading · 42,677 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
ProSignalsFx(Gold And Forex) @prosignalsfxx · 19,706 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
R. Linda Trading @RLindaTrade · 27,407 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
MARKET ANALYSIS @signalsfc · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
TopTradingSignals(Best Forex & Gold Signals) @top_tradingsignals · 32,261 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
UnitedSignals (Best Forex Signals) @UnitedSignalsFX · 26,868 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
🌸AnabelSignals🌸 Best Free Forex & Gold Signals @anabelsignals · 33,655 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
🎈Nova Scalper Channel™.🎈 @Novascalperchannel · 26,681 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Gold Trader Alliance 🔔 @BrianTradingForex · 48,047 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
FREE XTREMETRADER FOREX SIGNALS @xtremetradersignals · 18,901 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
A1 TRADING | Indices, Commodities, Forex, Futures @A1TradingFXAnalysis · 44,743 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeGRAM | Forex Analytics & Signals 📊” (@degramchannel), 8,319 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degramchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.