Channel
@ewstrategy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
61,356subscribers
+97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440615761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ewstrategy |
| Description | 📈 Elliott Waves & Price Action 📉 Currencies | Indices | Metals | Energy | Crypto |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ewstrategy |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 61,356 | +90 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 61,266 | +109 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 61,157 | +100 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 61,057 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 61,052 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 61,066 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 61,068 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 61,066 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 61,079 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 61,071 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:05 | 61,051 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 61,069 | +20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 61,049 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 61,031 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 61,050 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 61,026 | +23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 61,003 | +35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 60,968 | +16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 60,952 | +33 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 60,919 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (19 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 541,780 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#GBPJPY 🇬🇧🇯🇵 That correction kept us waiting a little… but Friday got things moving :) In Wednesday’s update, I was looking for another decline towards 207.45 and 205.00. Price has now reached 208.00 and closed the week near 208.30. We’re getting closer to the first target. A small bounce could come first, then I’m still expecting another move lower. Above 210.147, I’d need to revise this short-term count. I’ll k…
#NAS100 🇺🇸 There’s the pullback we were waiting for 👀 Nasdaq came into the marked area and is already moving higher again. In our last update, we talked about these smaller corrections inside a strong trend. Now you can see one on the chart. I’m looking for another push towards the upper channel line. First, let’s see Nasdaq get through the previous high. 🎁 Now is the perfect time to join us with the biggest disc…
⚡ 72-HOUR SALE! ⚡ THE BIGGEST DISCOUNT WE HAVE EVER OFFERED! 🎯 Every Elliott Wave Strategy plan is cut, Premium and Premium Plus alike: • Monthly: 30% off, and your price stays locked for as long as you keep the plan • Quarterly: 40% off, locked in • Yearly: 50% off, locked in • Lifetime: 60% off, one payment, yours forever. ⏳ 72 hours! If you have been waiting for the right moment, this is it!
#DXY 🇺🇸 The dollar had more room to rise than I expected. I’m still looking for a turn lower, but the RSI is worth watching here 👀 Price has pushed higher without the same strength in RSI. That divergence is a warning. A break of the RSI uptrend would give us more evidence. Below 101, I expect the decline to pick up speed. Above 101.8, my bearish count is invalid and the rally can continue. We’re not below 101 yet
#GBPJPY 🇬🇧🇯🇵 📍 Remember the correction from our last update? It took a little longer this time :) Price pushed slightly above our zone and is now coming back down. I still expect another move lower, towards 207.45 and 205.00. 🎯 This is why I update my charts every day. Corrections don’t always finish the way we first expect! In Premium, I share the full trading plan, including the potential entry and exit levels.…
#NAS100 🇺🇸 Nasdaq passed 30,500. We expected a small pullback first, but the move was stronger than expected. In a strong trend, small corrections can end quickly. Then price keeps moving higher. We’re watching 29,950–30,220 for wave (4), followed by another rise towards 30,900. After these five waves, we expect a bigger correction in wave ②. Our broader view is still up, so that correction will be important for …
#DXY 🇺🇸 Remember this chart from August 24? Take a look at it now 👀 Almost a month later… and the dollar has rallied straight into the 61.8% level, back under the broken trendline. Pretty precise, right? This rally was exactly what we were waiting for. Our bigger view hasn’t changed. Now comes the part we’re watching closely: the next move down. 🎯 Let’s follow it together in Premium.
#NAS100 🇺🇸 On Friday, we were looking for a move towards 30,000–30,100. Nasdaq is now around 30,000, and our focus is turning to the next pullback. We’re watching the marked 29,600–29,800 area for wave (4), followed by another push towards 30,500. That pullback hasn’t developed yet. It’s the next part of the plan we’re preparing for in Premium.
#USDCAD 🇺🇸🇨🇦 You don’t need to catch the exact top. Price has reached the 61.8–78.6% area. Now we want to see sellers take control, then assess the next pullback. Trying to catch the first turn can mean entering before there’s enough evidence. Think like a professional: know where you’re wrong and how much you’re prepared to lose. We’ll follow the next steps in Premium.
#NAS100 🇺🇸 The next move is taking shape now! The ABC correction looks complete, and Nasdaq is moving higher again. We’re looking for wave (3) towards 30,000–30,100, then a pullback before another push towards 30,500. That’s where we expect the first five-wave move to finish. A bigger correction comes next in our plan, before the next stage of the rally. So we’re already watching where the next pullbacks fit. We’…
#XAUUSD Blue or Red? The bounce we discussed in our last update is here. Now we’re watching two paths: 🔵 A pullback, then a bigger move higher. 🔴 A corrective bounce, then another drop. Plan your trade - Trade your plan!
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 We’ve been following this correction step by step. We shared 1.14723–1.15180 on Sept 10 and followed it again on Sept 14. Price has now moved below that zone and started to bounce. Next, we’re watching for a move up, then a pullback. It’s still early to call a full reversal. 👉 We’ll follow the next steps together in Premium.
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @ewstrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Çetin Çalışkan |
|---|---|
| Description | Elliott Wave analyst and founder of Elliott Wave Strategy (EWS) |
| X / Twitter | @ewstrategy |
| Official site | https://www.ew-strategy.com |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Wave Strategy” (@ewstrategy), 61,356 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ewstrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.