Channel
@ewstrategy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
61,190subscribers
-69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440615761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ewstrategy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ewstrategy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 61,190 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 61,231 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 61,248 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 61,268 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 61,277 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 61,274 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 61,259 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 61,259 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 390,950 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#NASDAQ #US100 🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) Three steps. That is the whole method. Step #1. A clear impulse tells you the direction. Step #2. The correction tells you where to get ready. Step #3. The next impulse pays you. Everyone wants step 3. Almost nobody sits through step 2, because corrections are slow and boring. That is exactly why they work. Plans are made when the market is quiet, not when it is running. #US100 is…
#EURAUD 🇪🇺🇦🇺 - (Chart Link) → The biggest mistake in trading is not bad analysis. It is trading too much. 20, 30, 40 trades a month is not a strategy. It is dopamine, and the account pays for every hit of it. Trading is 80% waiting. We follow our scenarios and wait like a hunter. No chasing, no forcing. When the right conditions form, we take the shot. When they don't, we take no shot. That is also a good month. …
#XAGUSD - (Chart Link) → Silver took the long way. The destination did not change. Instead of breaking down right away, price made one more rally. Look where it stopped. The exact zone that held silver as support twice in June. Old support becomes new resistance. The market remembers its levels. That rally completes wave B. The structure now points lower again! The road can twist. The map stays the same.
Making money in an impulse wave is easy. Keeping it during a correction is the hard part. Most traders get "chopped up" because they treat a correction like a trend. The market spends more time correcting than trending. If you can’t identify these structures, you are trading blind. 👇🏻 The 4 Pillars of Market Pauses (Save this Image): 1️⃣ Zigzags (The Sharp Correction) ⚡ • Structure: 5-3-5. • Behavior: Fast and dee…
#NASDAQ #US100 🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) → Price fell for weeks. The Daily 200 EMA said stop. The wave count said the same. That agreement is where turns are born. NAS100 is turning. 👉🏻 Premium
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) One clean impulse lower, then a long, messy correction. That is how markets breathe. The impulse shows the direction. The correction tests your patience. → Impulses move the market. Corrections just make you doubt it.
#EURJPY 🇪🇺🇯🇵 - (Chart Link) → Step by step hundreds of pips! (Proofs: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4)
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) → Gold spent two weeks building a triangle. We mapped every leg. You know what comes after E.
#XAGUSD - (Chart Link) Silver and triangles. Here we go again! This is the third triangle we have mapped on silver this summer. The first two paid. Now wave B has completed another one, five clean legs, finished at (e). You know the rule by now. Triangles are where the market rests, not where it turns. The real move comes after E. A break below the lower line opens the door toward 52.
📍 #XAUUSD $4.000
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) → Same view, same direction. Gold keeps moving the way we mapped it. Markets are full of opinions. What traders actually need is structure. That is the job we do here every day, on 27 instruments. 👉🏻 Make EWS part of your trading day. Take your seat in Premium!
#GBPJPY 🇬🇧🇯🇵 - (Chart Link) #GBPJPY is setting the stage. Triangle complete at E. The (C) dip toward 217.70 - 217.10 should finish wave 4. Then wave 5 points above 220. The setup is public. 👉🏻 Right place, right time. That is EWS Premium!
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ewstrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Çetin Çalışkan |
|---|---|
| Description | Elliott Wave analyst and founder of Elliott Wave Strategy (EWS) |
| X / Twitter | @ewstrategy |
| Official site | https://www.ew-strategy.com |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Wave Strategy” (@ewstrategy), 61,190 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ewstrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.