Channel
@Trade_Simple_FX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,434subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001313645543 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Trade_Simple_FX |
| Description | This channel provides traders with free access to multiple weekly chart setups. ALL setups must require your full confirmation and ARE NOT direct signals! So enter any trades at your own discretion. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Trade_Simple_FX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 8,434 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 8,460 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 8,463 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,755 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 27 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 57.7% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 10.3% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 8.97% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.69% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Take some profit now at +100 if you haven’t already. It’s struggling to break this 29710 level. Risk free, opening up TP for a long swing runner 🙏🏽🤞🏾 Time to leave this one alone and see if we crack.
1R and almost TP1 again on NASDAQ ✅ Stops to entry 🙏🏽👊🏾
Getting lots of new sign ups for the VIP group, speaking with many of you as you join. You can contact us here @IdrisTabrizi And you can sign up for less that $1/day! SIGN ME UP
TP1 smashed ✅ just shy of 2R on the NAS signal. Lows of 29,660 seen. Back to entry.
US100 H3 Some nice supply at current price, but our preferred entry sits at 29815 here, with stops around 29,900 price. Just short of that 30,000 psychological price. We may well reject from this current price level of 29,725, based on the supply and notable resistance. But we would prefer to enter from the most considerable level in reach. Pending order details to follow for the members.
❤3👍1
There goes TP1 ✅ Stops to entry and hold. If we get tapped, same again at stock market open.
🔥 MEMBERS TRADING ACCESS Get access to: 📊 Daily market commentary 🎯 Trade setups & signals 📈 Trade recaps & education 🎁 Giveaways & member perks 💬 Private VIP community OPTION 1 — FREE VIP ACCESS 🔥 Open & fund an account with our partner broker and your membership is FREE. 👉 Sign up: https://vigco.co/la-com-inv/Ufw4TbHO Recommended deposit: $500–$1,000 Once funded, send me confirmation and I’ll get you added to…
GBPJPY D1 A nice daily timeframe on FX here we can look to follow along with. We have some nice setups forming again, some nice trades and zones already taken this week. A break from indices and commodities, a nice swing we can hopefully hold on to for the coming week(s). Order details to follow for the members.
🔥1
That's all for now Tomorrow is a new day thanks sir 🤜🤛🤝
❤5
US30 H1 Update on US30 short signal, TP2 hit ✅. Moving really nicely, still holding XAUUSD signal. Hopefully we can see US30 tank some more and start filling this larger based range, XAUUSD can act as the follower. Strong start to the week.
🕊4
10/08/20026 - Signal and market review. Stock indices much more tame to start this week, 29800 rejected as expected, 54,000 rejected as expected. Gold also rejected as expected. Whereas WTI ripped upside. Charts and order details for the members to follow! Become a member today... SIGN ME UP
Fresh week ahead, lets get stuck in! We steadied the ship last week after a wave of unfortunate events, the zones we traded from held, our stops just couldn't handle the volume. Some of the setups we shared afterwards were killer! The plan remains the same, as always. Check out the plays we are following this week. It's shaping up to be a good one. We experienced the first losing week since the members group opened…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Trade_Simple_FX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who follows markets on the weekend? And if you could, would you trade XAUUSD to make money on the weekends?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade Simple - @Idris.Tabrizi.IG” (@Trade_Simple_FX), 8,434 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trade_Simple_FX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.