Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zede code

Channel

zede code

@zede_code

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,621subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001863217100
TypeChannel
Username@zede_code
Created13 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/zede_code

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6082,6362,6226 August 2026 — 2,608 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,618 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,625 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,634 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,636 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,635 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,632 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,633 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,628 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,627 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,625 subscribers11 October 2026 — 2,621 subscribers2,6216 August 202611 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 66 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,604–2,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 22:002,621-4
5 Oct 2026, 10:142,625-2
27 Sept 2026, 16:222,627-1
18 Sept 2026, 03:362,628-5
13 Sept 2026, 17:192,633+1
9 Sept 2026, 13:202,632-1
28 Aug 2026, 20:582,633-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:382,635-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:142,636+4
19 Aug 2026, 03:562,632-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:072,634+3
12 Aug 2026, 21:552,631+6
9 Aug 2026, 22:312,625+7
7 Aug 2026, 09:022,618+10
6 Aug 2026, 14:462,608no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:372,608first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

749 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥35046.7%
👍34145.5%
🤯374.94%
💩101.34%
🤔91.20%
👎20.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC870 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @synaptic_gardenVideo

Agent Plugins: единый формат расширений для ИИ-агентов OpenAI совместно с Amazon, Cursor, Microsoft, GitHub, VS Code и Vercel представила Agent Plugins 1.0 — открытый и независимый от конкретного поставщика стандарт упаковки расширений для ИИ-агентов. Его задача — решить проблему фрагментации: сами инструкции и MCP-серверы уже можно было использовать в разных продуктах, но каждый клиент требовал собственного манифес…

👍19

6 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC902 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стоило поныть только: (хотя это решает лишь часть моих претензий) И то что там нет Антропиков ни чуть не удивляет, пропади они пропадом)

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,820 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я крайне разочарован текущим состоянием AI-туллинга. Ощущение, будто всё делалось по принципу «хуяк-хуяк — и в продакшн», либо же из откровенно вредительских по отношению к пользователю мотивов. Мы только-только пришли к какому-то пониманию артефактов для агентов: команды / воркфлоу / скиллы / рулы / хуки / моды / сабагенты / AGENTS.md / MCP. И буквально всё это находится в зачаточном состоянии развития. Команды …

👍70🔥4💩2

7 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,970 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разгоняем подробно за реактивность во фронтенде twitch — youtube — vk

🔥13💩2

26 Mar 2026, 20:03 UTC≈9,390 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ситуация в найме ахтунг. Все и так все понимают. Но я хочу сделать очередное напоминание. Когда где-то возникает большой спрос, то скаммеры всегда найдутся. Случаи нередкие и происходят уже со знакомыми с определенной частотой Поэтому напоминание: НИЧЕГО не ставьте на комп связанное с работой до последнего. - ни для тестового задания! - ни для интервью! - ни для работы в первый день (если работаете неофициально)! …

👍61🤯13🔥5💩1🤔1

24 Mar 2026, 12:44 UTC≈4,470 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пообсуждали Vue vs React В целом.. обсуждение прошло достаточно травоядно, но возможно вы откроете для себя что-то новое Формат был почти 2 на 3, но вьюшникам не привыкать быть в меньшинстве :D

🔥37👍7🤯5

14 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 7 August 2026

Пообсуждаем все вышенаписанное

14 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTC≈3,770 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @holyjs_channelPhoto

#подкаст Программный комитет HolyJS в восторге от анонсов Vite+ Alpha и Vite 8! Разделить эмоции с нами можно завтра в 11:00 — в прямом эфире «Тяжелого утра»: 😉 YouTube 🙂 Twitch 📺 VK Видео

🔥10👍7

13 Mar 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,780 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тут мне сообщили. Можно забыть о платном Vite+ Он под MIT лицензией и будет всем и всегда бесплатным А вот платным делают отдельный продукт https://void.cloud/ А ля собственная деплой платформа. Крайне интресно обстоят дела. Но я крайне рад, что не придется мучаться с платным Vite+ (а с ИИ его функционал бы скопировали достаточно быстро и вопрос void zero был бы крайне острым) Видео с рассказом о Void https://www.…

🔥21👍4

13 Mar 2026, 09:42 UTC≈3,490 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вот и самая главная новость этой недели. VITE PLUS тоже вышел что дает: единый CLI чтобы править сразу всем (при этом с прекрасным DX) кроме знакомых инструментов от void zero можно увидеть такие фичи как - кэширование результата команд - новые стартовые темплейты - монорепы - система тасок - гит хуки - ЕДИНЫЙ КОНФИГ ДЛЯ ВСЕГО! и многое другое Анонс: https://voidzero.dev/posts/announcing-vite-plus-alpha Документ…

🔥22🤔3👍1

12 Mar 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,490 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вот наконец-то дождались и Vite 8 с Rolldown на борту релизнулся Дальше больше (учитывая посты Эвана) https://main.vite.dev/blog/announcing-vite8

🔥49👍10🤔1🤯1

15 Feb 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,910 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Большое обсуждение технологий фронта. Говорим о состоянии экосистемы и что нас ждетв 2026

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @zede_code. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zede code” (@zede_code), 2,621 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zede_code.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.