Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Душный Вуй

@stuffy_vuejs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

667subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002581687550
TypeChannel
Username@stuffy_vuejs
DescriptionНемного душные, но ламповые заметки о Vue.js #vuejs #vue #nuxt #vuex #pinia #вью #vapor
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stuffy_vuejs

Growth

6677 Aug 2026, 15:34 — 667 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:34 — 667 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:348 Aug 2026, 02:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 666–668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:34667no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:34667first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.3%
avg views ÷ 667 subscribers
Avg views / post
382
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 March 202623 July 2026)
Views total1,146
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
176
Videos
5
Links
408

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5327.9%
3719.5%
🔥3417.9%
😁3317.4%
🤡94.74%
💯84.21%
🌚73.68%
🤔42.11%
👎31.58%
🤝10.526%
🤮10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC371 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ancient_webPhoto

https://github.com/vuejs-ai/vue-tui Инструмент для построения TUI в синтаксисе vue. Поставляется в виде шаблона @vue-tui/vite ИЛИ через @vue-tui/runtime. <!-- app.vue --> <script setup lang="ts"> import { shallowRef } from "vue"; import { Box, Text, useInput } from "@vue-tui/runtime"; const count = shallowRef(0); useInput((input) => { // "+" is Shift+"=" on most keyboards, so accept the bare "=" too. if (input

5🤔3

20 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC358 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @frontend_pasta

Вышел Nuxt 4.5 — довольно крупный релиз 🍽 — Завезли Vite 8 — Rspack 2, теперь на базе Rsbuild — Экспериментальный SSR-стриминг для более быстрого TTFB — Новая стабильная система кодов ошибок — useLayout и именованные представления И ещё множество внутренних изменений, которые готовят Nuxt к версии 5 🤩 https://habr.com/ru/articles/1060996/

3👍1🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 10:42 UTC659 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ngxsamurai_mind_palacePhoto

⚠️ PrimeNG is Switching to a Paid License Model Have you seen the latest news regarding PrimeNG? PrimeTek is heavily restructuring its licensing model and moving away from a purely open-source approach for future major releases. Here are the key takeaways: 👉🏻 End of the Free MIT License: Starting with Version 22 (this also applies to PrimeReact and PrimeVue), everything will transition to the new, proprietary "Pri

🤮1

17 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTC923 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://habr.com/ru/articles/1045941/

👍2👎1🤔1😁1

17 Jun 2026, 12:42 UTC779 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Снова принёс вам свой впн, цены демократичные, сегодня можно забрать 1 месяц потыкать-попробовать, вооот https://t.me/vaban_vpn_bot?start

🤡3🤝1

15 Jun 2026, 19:19 UTC713 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tired_glebmikheevPhoto

Все записи FrontendConf 2025 Недавно выложили плейлист с 57 докладами с нашей последней конференции Что особенно рекомендую посмотреть: - Александр Васильев, Миллионы точек без лагов. Как делать интерактивную высоконагруженнеую real-time-графику на WebGL и WebGPU - Андрей Кузнецов, фронтендерские суперсилы. Очень рефлексивный софтовый доклад про то, какие мы все разные, как комбинировать людей в команде и как наход

👍6

2 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC589 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vueistPhoto

Не хочу ничего более обсуждать. Сегодня на улице праздник!

😁19

10 May 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,300 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://habr.com/ru/articles/1033300/

👍7🔥6

8 May 2026, 07:53 UTC851 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну и вообще подборка докладов с осеннего Holy JS 2025 от легенд нашего комунити 💪 • Денис Чернов — Созвездия композаблов • Анастасия Егорова — Самый безопасный фреймворк • Андрей Ёлкин — Делаем бэкенд на Nuxt • Евгений Кучерявый — Svelte — это Vue курильщика?

12🔥7💯4👍1

7 May 2026, 20:36 UTC673 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-cvORcZWh8 вышло видео где я час пишу прототип травордли, а люди это слушают

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stuffy_vuejs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Душный Вуй” (@stuffy_vuejs), 667 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stuffy_vuejs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.