15 measurements spanning 14 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,775–32,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 13:46
31,808
-13
18 Aug 2026, 16:55
31,821
-17
17 Aug 2026, 20:04
31,838
-23
16 Aug 2026, 16:28
31,861
-16
14 Aug 2026, 22:33
31,877
-38
13 Aug 2026, 11:28
31,915
-11
12 Aug 2026, 08:52
31,926
-12
11 Aug 2026, 09:42
31,938
-15
10 Aug 2026, 13:02
31,953
-13
9 Aug 2026, 12:41
31,966
-18
8 Aug 2026, 14:21
31,984
-25
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
32,009
-21
6 Aug 2026, 10:02
32,030
-1
6 Aug 2026, 01:51
32,031
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:32
32,031
first reading
Engagement
313 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.59%
avg views ÷ 31,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,050
313 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
313
of 313 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
313 (5 August 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
955,019
Reactions total
19,834
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈27,100
Videos
≈15,000
Links
≈32,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 15m
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 166 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,052 reactions across 298 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,215
22.1%
🤬
3,285
17.2%
🤮
2,329
12.2%
❤
1,869
9.81%
😡
1,121
5.88%
🔥
1,081
5.67%
😁
881
4.62%
👏
791
4.15%
💯
542
2.84%
🙏
540
2.83%
💔
441
2.31%
👎
307
1.61%
🎉
273
1.43%
🤔
201
1.06%
🥴
150
0.787%
😱
132
0.693%
😢
113
0.593%
🥰
113
0.593%
⚡
102
0.535%
🤪
102
0.535%
17 further kinds
464
2.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 313 of the 313 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 313 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸Бывший офицер ЦРУ Джон Кириаку в подкасте раскритиковал политику Израиля и заявил, что страна теряет поддержку американского общества и военных.
🔴Комментируя фотографии американского самолёта, на крыле которого были размещены саркастические надписи о войне и Израиле, Кириаку обратил внимание на фразы «Всё это ради Святой земли» и «Будь хорошим мальчиком и делай то, что говорит тебе Израиль»
🔴По его словам, США не…
🇵🇸"Единственной анестезией для пятилетней девочки - была песня, которую ей пел анестезиолог"
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣Доктор из США Марк Перлмуттер рассказывает, как в Газе пятилетней девочке ампутировали ногу без анестезии. Она оставалась в сознании на протяжении всей процедуры. Мы молились, чтобы она потеряла сознание.
🔻Он описывает приемный покой, в котором находятся дети с оторванными конечностями, и говорит, что обратился к с…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣Активист обратил внимание на шведскую Библию XIX века с картой Газы.
📖"Шведская Библия XIX века показывает, что Израиль не находился на Святой земле. Она была опубликована до Библии Скофилда , которая пыталась исказить историю и познакомить американцев с сионизмом',- прокомментировал публикацию член Американского союза гражданских свобод Сэм Юссеф.
🌐 Подписаться на канал «Yeni Şafak на русском»
🇻🇪Похоже, что правительство Венесуэлы отошло от фигуры Николаса Мадуро.
🔴За почти две недели переговоров с оппозицией чиновники ни разу не поднимали вопрос об освобождении бывшего президента, находящегося под стражей в США.
🔴Временный президент Дельси Родригес, некогда яростная защитница Мадуро, теперь редко упоминает его и занимается консолидацией власти, одновременно сотрудничая с Вашингтоном.
🔴Переговоры вместо…
🇮🇱🔴🇸🇾Нетаньяху о Сирии:
🔴Мы не потерпим турецкого военного закрепления, продвигающегося на юг. Мы уже дали это понять в общих словах.
Теперь мы увидели, что у Турции было намерение обосноваться на аэродроме недалеко от Алеппо. И мы передали сообщение.
Сообщение было передано, но, судя по всему, они его не услышали. Поэтому мы позаботились о том, чтобы они поняли его лучше.
🌐 Подписаться на канал «Yeni Şafak на ру
🇲🇾Премьер-министр Малайзии Анвар Ибрагим в интервью Al Jazeera English заявил, что западное лицемерие в отношении конфликтов на Ближнем Востоке «нельзя терпеть», и раскритиковал подход западных держав к ситуации в Газе и Иране.
🔴 По словам Ибрагима, проблема Газы существует уже около 70 лет, однако теперь от Малайзии, которую он назвал развивающейся страной, ожидают её решения.
🔴Он также отметил, что Малайзия была …
🇮🇱Посол США в Израиле Майк Хакаби признал, что насильственные действия израильских экстремистов на оккупированном Западном берегу наиболее точно можно назвать «террором».
✅В интервью израильскому телеканалу Channel 12 дипломат назвал происходящее редким случаем публичной критики со стороны США. Его заявление прозвучало после многодневной осады дома палестино-американской семьи израильскими оккупантами в деревне Куср…
🇰🇿🛢Казахстан усилит защиту нефтегазовых объектов в своем секторе Каспийского моря, разместив силы и технику оперативного штаба по борьбе с терроризмом.
🔴Нефтегазовые компании по запросу штаба должны будут предоставить мобильные площадки для размещения сотрудников и оборудования. Расходы на работу штаба возьмут на себя недропользователи. Размер затрат и порядок их оплаты стороны согласуют отдельно.
🌐 Подписаться на …
📄📄📄Турция и Сирия договорились о сотрудничестве в добыче фосфатов
➡️С турецкой стороны соглашение заключила компания MTA IC, входящая в структуру Генерального управления по исследованию и разведке полезных ископаемых Турции (MTA), с сирийской — Главное управление геологии и минеральных ресурсов Сирии.
✏️Продолжение статьи читайте на нашем сайте:https://ru.yenisafak.com/news/51363
🌐 Подписаться на канал «Yeni Şafak…
🇺🇦🔴🔴По данным издания Bloomberg, как минимум пять сухогрузов, прибывших в Черное море за российским зерном, подверглись атакам украинских БПЛА в Черном море. Инциденты произошли в понедельник и вторник в районе портов Новороссийска и Туапсе.
🛢Ранее украинские беспилотники в основном атаковали танкеры, перевозившие российскую нефть. Из-за этого на прошлой неделе Новороссийск не смог отправить ни одной партии.
🔴Экспо…
🔎🇮🇱Израильская армия начала уголовное расследование по факту убийства в январе 2024 года шестилетней палестинки Хинд Раджаб, её родственников и двух парамедиков в Газе.
🔴Ранее ЦАХАЛ отрицал свою причастность.
🌐Подписаться на канал «Yeni Şafak на русском»
🤮52🤔10❤8🥱4🙏3👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 313 posts we hold for @yenisafak_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yenisafak_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 34,773 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yenisafak_ru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bennavisuals named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NIYSO @niysoo · 168,593 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan @RTErdogan · 94,855 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Antalya Hakkında @antalya_hakkinda · 111,869 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yeni Şafak на русском” (@yenisafak_ru), 31,808 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yenisafak_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
