Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Яна Зенина/Яяна

Channel

Яна Зенина/Яяна

@yanazenina

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

215,299subscribers

-610 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583553547
TypeChannel
Username@yanazenina
DescriptionРеклама: [email protected] @Lya_kse_nya PR: @fadeevaarina
Created7 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yanazenina

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

215,299215,909215,6046 August 2026 — 215,909 subscribers6 August 2026 — 215,909 subscribers6 August 2026 — 215,905 subscribers7 August 2026 — 215,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 215,836 subscribers9 August 2026 — 215,771 subscribers10 August 2026 — 215,718 subscribers11 August 2026 — 215,553 subscribers12 August 2026 — 215,379 subscribers13 August 2026 — 215,368 subscribers14 August 2026 — 215,339 subscribers16 August 2026 — 215,299 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -610. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215,208–216,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 01:56215,299-40
14 Aug 2026, 08:38215,339-29
13 Aug 2026, 00:17215,368-11
12 Aug 2026, 03:42215,379-174
11 Aug 2026, 05:41215,553-165
10 Aug 2026, 07:43215,718-53
9 Aug 2026, 08:41215,771-65
8 Aug 2026, 07:16215,836-12
7 Aug 2026, 07:05215,848-57
6 Aug 2026, 03:30215,905-4
6 Aug 2026, 01:30215,909no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:14215,909first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 215,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
73,000
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held24 (24 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total1,751,600
Reactions total142,769
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,520
Videos
195
Links
253

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 08s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132,831 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥125,06094.1%
😢7,7715.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142,769reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
265
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 24 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yanazenina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC≈30,300 views3,669 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3,320😢349

15 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈47,200 views5,734 reactions8 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

купила такую кофточку как вам ?🥹

❤‍🔥5,430😢304

14 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈54,600 views6,715 reactions37 Starsread 16 August 2026

вышел платный дом с моим участием у Егора на канале я посмотрела видос и загналась, что я там ужасно выгляжу и что я там какая-то злая и уродливая хахаха такой вумен момент типичный 🫠🫠🫠

❤‍🔥5,970😢745

14 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈55,000 views1,568 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

у меня одной август всегда ощущается как воскресенье перед новой учебной неделей ? 😭 вроде еще лето ... еще тепло ... а внутри уже какое то чувство что скоро начнется учеба или работа у кого тоже так ? или с чем у вас вообще ассоциируется август ? ) и если среди вас есть те , кто сейчас переходит в 9 или 11 класс , не начинайте заранее переживать из за экзаменов, пожалуйста 🙏🏻 намного спокойнее готовиться понемногу

❤‍🔥1,460😢108

13 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈59,900 views5,666 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026

мы успели !!!

❤‍🔥5,440😢226

13 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈61,000 views5,398 reactions9 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥4,950😢448

12 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈68,800 views3,675 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026

мой Егор на ВПИСКЕ !!! и я там тоже немножко есть всем срочно смотреть https://youtu.be/7AdMkrfeTJQ?si=PvPvfPE02WTIe2Md

❤‍🔥3,530😢145

11 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈66,400 views3,276 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026

https://youtu.be/IcJEFOpKH0s

❤‍🔥3,150😢126

10 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈70,300 views8,812 reactions16 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

у меня сегодня чрезмерная любовь к моему коту сори, но почему он настолько мили 🥺🥹

❤‍🔥8,320😢492

10 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈70,200 views2,135 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

если бы мне в 2006 сказали, что через 20 лет я буду скучать по раскладушкам , стразам и этим ужасным фоткам со вспышкой ... я бы не поверила 😭 но сейчас смотрю на все это и думаю БОЖЕ КАКОЕ БЫЛО ВРЕМЯ ))) и тут Т-Банк решил буквально вернуть нас обратно в этом году ему 20 лет , поэтому Т-Банк вернул 2006 💛 они сделали интерактивную квартиру №2006 , полностью в атмосфере тех лет ... только среди всех этих вещей еще

❤‍🔥2,020😢115

10 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈69,600 views7,960 reactions14 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

❤️

❤‍🔥7,580😢380

8 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈78,800 views10,544 reactions12 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

делюсь кадрами со свадьбы Димы и Клавы ❤️

❤‍🔥9,930😢614

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @yanazenina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,387 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яна Зенина/Яяна” (@yanazenina), 215,299 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanazenina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.