Channel
@street_mba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,806subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002889253897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @street_mba |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/street_mba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 1,806 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 1,813 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 1,823 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 1,823 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,982 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Rivojlanishning eng og'ir narxi Ancha yildan beri biz bilan ishlab kelgan, Sadoqatli, Korxonani sevadigan, Harakatchan va korxona uchun ko'p narsa qilib ulgurgan, xodimlar bilan ham xayrlashib turish kerak. Agar ular bizga kerakli darajani bera olishmay qolsa. To'g'ri, bunday insonlar bilan xayirlash narxi juda og'ir. Lekin, Xayrlashmaslikni ham narxi og'ir. Har doim sadoqatni kompetensiyadan ustun qo‘yadigan…
Korporativ vabo 1347–1353 yilda butun Yevropani vabo (чума) bosib oldi. Jamiyatni xavf ostiga qo’ymaslik uchun kasallarni shahardan uzoqroqdagi maxsus izolyatsiyalashtirilgan joylarga chiqarib yuborishgan. Vabo tarqagan vodiylardan kelgan kemalarni 30-40 kun davomida shaharga kirgizishmagan. Karantin majburiy chora bo’lgan. Aks xolda butun shahar yoki davlat halok bo’lishi mumkin edi. Agar korxonamizda quyidagi…
Qo'pollikka kirmaydi Xodim yollashni endi-endi boshlaganimda suhbat jarayonida nomzodlar mavzudan tashqariga o'tlab ketsa gapini bo'lmas edim. — Birov gapirganida suhbatni buzmagin, bu qo'pollikka kiradi bolam. - deb o'rgatishganda. Hozir esa nomzod mavzudan tashqariga chiqib ketsa darrov, "Judayam qiziq, lekin keling mavzuga qaytaylik", "Sizni javobingizni men bergan savolga nima dahli bor?", "Men jo'nim bilan s…
Majburiyat ≠ Mas’uliyat Buxgalterimiz aldab ketgan bo‘lsa, demak, biz rahbar sifatida zaif tizim qurdik. Yaxshi sotuvchimiz “nonko‘rlik” qilib ketib qolgan bo‘lsa, demak, biz rahbar sifatida odam tanlashda adashdik, kelishuvni to‘g‘ri qilmadik yoki e’tiborli bo‘lmadik. Marketologimiz “ishni eplay olmagan” bo‘lsa, demak, biz rahbar sifatida vazifalarni aniq bermadik, yetarlicha nazorat qilmadik yoki kerakli resursl…
"Quiet firing" Ishdan bo'shatishni ikkita yo'li bor. Birinchisi. To'g'ridan to'g'ridan to'g'ri suhbat orqali bo'shatish. Bunday suhbatlar yoqimsiz bo'ladi. O'g'ir o'tadi. His tuyg'ularga boy bo'ladi. Uzoq davom etadi, vaqt sekin o'tadi. Xullas bu ish "dux" talab qiladi. Ustiga ustak xodim bizdan xafa bo'lib qolishi ham hech gap emas. Shuning uchun ham ko'p rahbarlar bu uslubni yoqtirishmaydi. Ikkinchisi. Ishdan…
"Quiet quitting" Zo'r xodimimiz o'ziga qo'shimcha vazifa olmay qo'ygan bo'lsa, Faqat chizilgan chiziq bo'yicha yurishga o'tib olgan bo'lsa, 9-18 rejimini mahkam ushlab ish yonib yotsa ham ishda 1 daqiqa ham ortiqcha vaqt o'tkazmayotgan bo'lsa, Ishga emotsional yondashmay qo'ygan bo'lsa, Lekin hali hamon ishdan bo'shamagan bo'lsa, Bilaylikki, U shovqinsiz ishdan bo'shab bo'lgan. G'arbda buni "quiet quitting" de…
Kolxoz direktori majlisda: O'tgan yili 1 gektar jo'xori ekkan edik, hammasini qurt yeb ketdi. Bu yili 2 gektar jo'xori edik, hammasini qurt yeb ketdi. Keyingi yil 10 gektar jo'xori ekamiz. Qurtlarni qorni yorilib o'lsin. Boshqa jo'xori yemaydigan bo'ladi. To’g’ri, vaziyat kulgili. Lekin, O’zimizni harakatlarimizga ham bir qarab qo’yaylik-da. Sabablarni o’rniga oqibatlar bilan kurashmayapmizmi? Xodimlar tez-te…
Xodimni mehnatini "ignor" qilish va uni e’tiborsiz qoldirish xodimni qilgan mehnatini uni ko’z oldida barbod qilish bilan bir xil. #boshqaruv @street_mba / @mashrabov_aa
Bepul xodim «Bir-ikki oy sinov muddati» deb pul to’lamasdan xodim ishlatishni cho’ntagimizga plyusi bo’lishi mumkin, Lekin, Yaqqol minuslari ham yo’q emas: 1. Tanqidimizni qabul qilishi qiyin bo’ladi. Bu meni ishimdan kamchilik topib pul to’lamasdan chopib yubormoqchi degan gumonlarga boradi. 2. O’zini 100% ishga bag’ishlay olmaydi. Qornini o’ylaydi. Ro’zg’orni o’ylaydi. 3. Yaxshi nomzodlarni yo’qotamiz. Kuc…
Aloqani ushlaylik Ishdan bo’shab ketganlarni qayta ishga chaqirish «tupurgan tuprikni qaytarib olish» bilan bir xil narsa emas. Past ketish ham emas. Yalinish ham emas. G’arbda buni «boomerang recruiting» deyishadi. Va bunga zo’r qarashadi. Birinchidan. E’lonlardan pul tejaladi. Xodimni moslashtirishdan ham pul tejaladi. Ichki muhitdan va ishdan xabari borda chunki. Ikkinchidan. Boshqalarga yaxshi ibrat bo’lad…
Ideal trayektoriya "Bezel" klubidan nomi chiqqan "Chelsea" klubiga o'tdi. Lekin u yerda yaxshi o'ynay olmadi va asosiy vaqtini zaxirada o'tkazdi. Keyin uni ijaraga "Fiorentina", undan keyin esa "Roma" klubiga berib yuborishdi. "Roma" klubida zo'r o'yin ko'rsatib yana nomi chiqqan klubga, "Liverpulga" qaytdi. "Liverpulda" ancha muncha rekkordlar qo'ydi, Chempionlar ligasini yutdi, Angliya Premier Ligasini eng zo'r…
Avval osh, keyin desert Choyxonaga borib o'tirishni desert bilan boshlasak ketidan dunyodagi eng zo'r osh ham ketmaydi. Oshqozonni ham o'zini ketma ketligi borda. Avval - asosiy taom. Desert, tarvuz-qovun, chak-quqlar esa keyin. Korxonamiz ham oshqozon kabi ishlaydi, Avval - asosiy vazifalar. Turli xil AI-yechimlar, SAP'lar, murakkab moliyaviy dasturlar esa keyin. Masalan, internet do'konimiz skladida stabil ra…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @street_mba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 29,921 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Street MBA / Abror Mashrabov bilan” (@street_mba), 1,806 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/street_mba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.