Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

新加坡大事件

@xjiapo8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,902subscribers

-4,197 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002621835814
TypeChannel
Username@xjiapo8
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xjiapo8

Growth

19,90224,09922,000.58 August 2026 — 24,099 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,700 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,363 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,375 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,375 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,921 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,340 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,902 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4,197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,272–24,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:1819,902-438
14 Aug 2026, 01:0920,340-581
12 Aug 2026, 17:1420,921-454
11 Aug 2026, 18:1521,375-1,000
10 Aug 2026, 15:5622,375-988
9 Aug 2026, 16:0423,363-337
8 Aug 2026, 17:3523,700-399
8 Aug 2026, 08:3224,099first reading

Engagement

148 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 19,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
599
148 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
148
of 148 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held148 (7 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total88,634
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52m 25s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

#群友投稿:金边BKK1区中国男子赤裸上身在房顶上来回徘徊 一看就是DU品吸多了,上头了,等下要被带走了🤣 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇭 泰国总理阿努廷开飞机 F-16战机护航 昨天,泰国总理阿努廷驾驶一架小型私人飞机飞往呵叻府第1航空团。期间,泰国空军出动3架F-16战机为其护航,进行模拟要员保护演习。 演习中,两架F-16伴飞在阿努廷专机两侧,另一架在其上方护航。第1航空团第103飞行中队还向阿努廷赠送了一枚印有米老鼠图案及“F-16 Fighting Mickey”字样的专属臂章。 国王、总理都会开飞机~~ 这一点柬埔寨是没法比啊 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

同样是15号发工资,差距咋这么大😂😂。 我们也是在柬埔寨,去年的时候组里面人均工资都有个几千块美金,到了如今,7个人有5个工资都是负的。 你们都干的啥这么挣钱呀????? 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#国内资讯:广西崇左打掉特大组织偷渡团伙 8月13日晚,广西崇左边境管理支队通报,警方打掉一个境内外勾结的特大组织偷渡团伙。该团伙以“境外高薪招聘”为诱饵,通过网络招募人员,利用出租屋进行中转,再通过边境便道组织偷渡,将人员输送至境外电诈园区。 专案组先后开展52次集中收网行动,共抓获涉案人员400余人,打掉12个犯罪团伙,捣毁20余处中转窝点,斩断5条偷渡通道,并扣押涉案车辆80余台。 警方提醒,所谓“境外高薪、包吃住”招聘背后可能暗藏偷渡、电诈等犯罪风险,切勿轻信并参与非法出境活动。 PS:不知道是哪家的精英伏法了 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:今天十五号,又到了发工资的日子,行业是比以前好做得多。 以前是狼多肉少,现在反过来了,感谢柬埔寨政府的大清扫。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#群友分享:律师分享干货,回流狗推家属必知! 今年不少从境外回来的涉诈人员被集中收押,很多家属拿到拘留通知书,整个人都懵了,不知道该干啥、从哪下手。越慌,越容易做错事。 第一,这类案子大多骗的是境外人,受害者信息、被骗金额,很难查彻底。 不像本地诈骗,能快速找到受害人、核实金额。境外回流案里,受害人分散在国外,资金流向也乱,很多时候没法把每一笔被骗金额都核实清楚,这也是这类案子的特殊之处。 第二,客观证据不好固定,当事人的口供、同案的指认,就特别关键。 境外取证本来就难,很多电子记录、作案痕迹容易缺失。这时候,当事人怎么说、同案犯怎么指认,直接影响案子走向。 比如:有没有进过诈骗园区、待了多久、具体干的啥活、赚了多少钱。这些细节说不清楚,很容易影响量刑。 第三,不用硬找被害人谅解,也不是非要退赃退赔。 很多家属以为,只要退钱、拿到谅解,就能轻判,其实不然。 尤其是家人只做引流、养号、打杂这些辅助工作的,根本对应

15 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:西港突袭涉嫌网络诈骗地点,25人被捕 8月14日——据当地警方消息,根据西哈努克省政府省长的指示,西哈努克市行政指挥部在西哈努克省法院检察官的协调下,对西哈努克市第四区第五村的10栋公寓楼开展突击检查行动。 据警方通报,此次行动共查获30台笔记本电脑和85部手机等电子设备。行动中,当局共逮捕25名人员,其中包括14名涉嫌参与网络诈骗的人员,其中2人为中国公民。2人为女性,以及11名涉嫌无有效护照及相关合法证件居住的人员。 目前,相关嫌疑人及查获的证据已被移送至西哈努克省警察总部,接受进一步审讯和调查。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

泰缅边境出现新大型诈骗园区“瑞当尼” 多个迹象引发关注 近日,泰缅边境地区出现一个名为“瑞当尼”(Shwe Taung Ni)的新型大型园区,引发外界关注。 据了解,该园区位于缅甸克伦邦DKBA控制区域,靠近DKBA总部,与泰国美索地区仅隔一条梅河,从泰方部分区域可直接看到园区建筑。 现场信息显示,园区内建设有大量封闭式宿舍,并进行编号管理,同时配备大面积太阳能设备和星链网络设施。目前已有人员入住迹象,园区规模可容纳数千人,外围安保较为严密。 由于雨季期间缅甸一侧道路条件较差,园区物资和人员运输主要依赖泰国一侧通道,通过美索、坡帕及边境道路运输后,再进入园区。 此前,部分诈骗园区遭到打击后,有人员被转移至该区域。消息称,DKBA控制范围内还有多个类似项目正在建设,诈骗活动可能正从集中式大型园区向更加分散化模式转移。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

一波兰籍餐厅老板在高龙岛身亡 警方初步排除刑事案件 昨晚8时,西港警方赶赴高龙市高龙分区,调查一起波兰籍男子死亡案。死者为38岁波兰籍男子MAKSYMOWICZ SZYMON,系当地DOBRO餐厅老板。 据员工透露,死者长期嗜酒。13日晚饮酒后其出现吐血症状,次日病情加重送医,随后被确认死亡。法医及法医警察检查未发现明显创伤,初步判断死因为心肌梗死。目前遗体已暂存至西港省立医院。 醉汉客死他乡~~ 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

15 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

加大打击力度!斯里兰卡警方:今年外籍涉诈超千人被抓 斯里兰卡警方发言人伍特勒(F.U. Wootler)8月13日在记者会通报,今年以来警方开展24次专项突击,累计抓获1093名外籍涉案嫌疑人。 对比历年:2024年26起案件抓573名外籍人员;2025年2起案件抓26名。今年前8月抓捕量较2025年全年增约42倍,较2024年全年增约90%,打击量级明显跃升。 目前司法程序已启动,所有涉案外籍人员将依法办理遣返,送回所属国。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

14 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC2 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#网友反馈:老挝金三角特区的山水酒店现在正在检查 现场又有办公的被抓住了,现在在山水酒店的, 不要去一楼,门口被治安局守着的想出来的人一律检查手机的内容 PS:房间不要放手机电脑!!最近风好大! 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

14 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC2 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:金三角特区内的物业已经陆续开始发出通知。 物业会不定时抽查,发现电诈会直接上报治安局(抽查估计会包括证件问题)。 PS:特区内的小伙伴还好吗,被逮住就要天天吃稀饭白馒头了 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @xjiapo8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,149,452 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“新加坡大事件” (@xjiapo8), 19,902 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xjiapo8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.