Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚大事件

Channel

东南亚大事件

@txotxo

Has discussion group9 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49,327subscribers

-55,971 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002636404515
TypeChannel
Usernames@baoguangnet @ddny88 @oocao @oovhe @ss408 @txotxo @zhongnanhai @zuangzuang @zui_e
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #泰国 #菲律宾 东南亚大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 其他东南亚大事件均为模仿!请注意识别,防止被诈骗或敲诈勒索! 商务合作: @bt555 防失联导航: @dsjdny88 投稿爆料机器人: @dsj555_bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held265
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/txotxo

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 11 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 10 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@txotxo/34620 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC@wdubai188/2890410 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@txotxo/34955 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC@wdubai188/2923916 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@txotxo/35062 · this entry18 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC@wdubai188/2934618 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@wdubai188/2989728 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC@txotxo/35667 · this entry28 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@txotxo/36471 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC@wdubai188/3070315 Oct 2026, 10:13 UTC1.0072 seconds
@wdubai188/3095721 Oct 2026, 12:18 UTC@txotxo/36720 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@wdubai188387 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (199–188)
@djpz188266 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven
@mmiandian262 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mmiandian (138–124)
@fflb188219 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (122–97)
@ttaiguo196 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ttaiguo (104–92)
@mmlxy88180 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mmlxy88 (96–84)
@yyuenan165 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (87–78)
@llaowo18129 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (73–56)
@xjiapo8109 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (57–52)
@djs12310 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.886 minutesthis entry (9–1)
@sililanka1887 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.885 minutesthis entry (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 944 of the 944 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,582 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 10 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @xjiapo8. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 10 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

49,327151,837100,5827 August 20269 November 2026
265 measurements spanning 94 days, net -55,971. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,951–167,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 265
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:3849,327no change
9 Nov 2026, 20:5649,327-34
9 Nov 2026, 19:5649,361no change
9 Nov 2026, 19:4649,361-245
9 Nov 2026, 10:4649,606-1,007
8 Nov 2026, 14:1550,613-20
8 Nov 2026, 12:4750,633-21
8 Nov 2026, 12:1850,654-182
8 Nov 2026, 08:0650,836-257
7 Nov 2026, 23:2051,093-58
7 Nov 2026, 10:1651,151-19
7 Nov 2026, 09:1751,170-92
7 Nov 2026, 06:5951,262-166
7 Nov 2026, 05:2651,428-409
6 Nov 2026, 21:0851,837-336
6 Nov 2026, 12:3652,173-7
6 Nov 2026, 11:2552,180-49
6 Nov 2026, 08:2052,229-50
6 Nov 2026, 02:1752,279-241
5 Nov 2026, 22:3952,520first reading

Engagement

1,940 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.49%
avg views ÷ 49,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
503 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.043%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
503
of 1,940 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 503 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held1,940 (7 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total617,549
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈30,000
Videos
≈6,440
Links
≈6,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 59m
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 354 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1266.7%
❤633.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 September 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 503 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ #东南亚顶级高爆电子台!😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌 USDT存出款,东南亚盘总首选U台👍不限ip 😝😍🥰😝#在122平台用200人民币中220万大奖是什么体验?查看视频 👈 爆奖时间:2026-10-12 玩家充值3万人民币,仅用200一拉直接爆了11000倍史诗级巨奖 提款326800U秒到账 ❗️❗️ 😍再创新高:2026年3月30 某盘总在122体育pg麻将1中2万一拉爆出1300万的惊天巨奖 😍震撼来袭:2026年1月4号 金边某盘总在122体育极速糖果仅用500爆得500万超级巨奖 雪中送炭不如锦上添花: 单笔出款100万 额外奖励8888 单笔出款300万 额外奖励28888 单笔出款500万 额外奖励58888 单笔出款800万 额外奖励88888 单笔出款1000万 额外奖励128888 122体育18年(…

10 Nov 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉台|玩家首选 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合平台 集团耗资2亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台 🇺🇸🇻🇳🇷🇪🇻🇪🇺🇸🇻🇳 #大玩家首选 免实名 免手机号 电子最高可拉2万一转 支持USDT K豆 OKpay 等20多种虚拟币钱包 👌微信 👌支付宝 银行卡存取款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘2028体育精彩时刻: 3月31号 柬埔寨西港狗推PG电子单笔提300万 4月13号 盘总级玩家麻将胡单笔提款2000万 5月15号 泰国盘总推荐大哥首存提款600万 6月15号 缅甸大哥麻将胡了爆奖励提款470万 7月11号 泰国盘总完美对子真人视讯提款580万 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 #全网福利天花板 1、首存送 复存送 投注送 劳力士豪车嫩模!! 2、电子黄金周 周一至周日福利拿不停! 3、单笔出款100万奖励最高 8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ …

10 Nov 2026, 14:36 UTC25 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#群友反馈:西港日月兴赌场路段,宪兵设卡查车,查毒品,违禁作,吓得楼上的推推闻风而逃。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

10 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#南洋半生 如履薄冰半世行, 偏踏南洋万里程。 少时不懂人间苦, 半生漂泊异国城。 曾怀壮志闯南洋, 如今狗推话沧桑。 白日键盘敲梦想, 夜深孤枕伴愁肠。 一身疲惫无人问, 满嘴牛皮自己扛。 昨日还谈赚千万, 今朝又在找下家。 西装穿过几回旧, 业绩吹过几多场。 朋友圈里风光无限, 银行卡里略显凄凉。 缅甸风雨柬埔寨, 泰国越南又一场。 南洋走过千重路, 回头已是半生霜。 少年不知归家路, 中年方晓故乡长。 父母盼儿门前坐, 儿在异乡数月光。 若问此生何所获, 一身故事半身伤。 南洋已过半生路, 梦里依旧是故乡。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

10 Nov 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,180 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

#群友投稿:快到年底了,还在东南亚坚持的人,还有多少? 时间过得真快,感觉年初还没过去多久,转眼又到了年底。这一年,东南亚的变化确实不小。从柬埔寨到缅甸,从菲律宾到老挝,再到马来西亚,清查、整顿、突击行动接连不断,各个地方的风声一直很紧。 以前热闹的街道,如今冷清了不少;以前熟悉的市场,也没有了往日的景象。园区清零、人员撤离、公司没了,这些事情几乎成了这一年的常态。 一年的时间,说长不长,说短也不短。还在这里的人,或许已经习惯了这种环境,但外面的变化,谁也无法忽视。 岁月如梭,寒来暑往,一转眼又是一年。现在再问一句,东南亚还适合留下来吗? 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

10 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:图片此人早期盘踞柬埔寨从事军包诈骗、美国华侨诈骗,担任公司总负责人、大代理、主管等多种职务。 吉米(戴眼镜、一头白毛,福建漳州籍);公司老板:托尼,之前听说改名老K(福建漳州籍),长期在马来遥控操作指挥。 公司代理有:张帅、阿浩、大山、老游、阿财、小猪、阿进、阿东。 后台管理:阿浩、天赐、小凯。 集团大老板:三证集团老蒋(福建漳州籍)旗下分公司。 最开始军包公司在缅甸佤邦,后面因为缅甸严打,搬家到柬埔寨木牌园区,分为多个部门诈骗。每个月军包公司一个部门业绩至少3000万人民币打底,美国华侨公司业绩每个月至少2000万打底。 后面因为木牌出事后待不下去,搬家到财通5A园区和金湾园区继续从事诈骗。在财通5A园区,一名国内骗过来的小孩子因为数据不达标,被吉米、主管、组长以及其他的员工活活殴打致死。最后整个公司都被警察包围,公司搬家走到七星海园区。 到七星海园区也是无恶不作,导致很多国内骗招过来的小孩每天强制要…

10 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📱苹果用户一定注意! 苹果手机又出漏洞了,装错一个App,钱包里的U可能被无感偷走 11月8日,有个开发者在 GitHub 上公开了一个苹果漏洞,名字叫 worse_query。 用大白话说:苹果本来给每个 App(沙盒)都关在自己的小房间里,互相看不到。这个漏洞能让一个 App 从小房间里溜出来,去翻别的 App 的东西,还能改。 那问题就大了。你手机里要是装了个带毒的 App,它就能借这个漏洞去翻你钱包 App 里的数据,你这边一点感觉都没有,U 可能就没了。 受影响的版本很多,iOS 26.0 到 26.7.2,还有 27.2,连 27.3 测试版都有。作者说已经报给苹果了,但到现在还没修好,代码却已经公开,网上已经有人拿它做成工具了。 用苹果的兄弟,这段时间注意: 1. 来路不明的 App 一个都别装,特别是别人私发的安装包、要你点"信任"的企业签名 App,骗子最爱用这招。 2. 苹果一推送更新,马上升级。…

10 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

柬埔寨西港部分大型建筑停工、拆除,昔日繁华景象逐渐褪去。 近日,西哈努克城部分大型建筑已停止施工,部分建筑陆续被拆除。至于这些建筑后续将如何规划、是否会有新的项目进驻,目前尚不清楚。 曾经热闹的西港,如今不少区域显得格外冷清,大型建筑施工相继停摆,城市也逐渐恢复了往日难得的寂静。据悉,照片拍摄于西哈努克城 Chhneo Cheu Teal 路段。 西港的变化,或许只有亲眼见证过这里曾经繁华的人,才能真正感受到。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

10 Nov 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#印尼资讯:警方联手通讯部,加强打击跨国电诈及网络赌博 印尼国家警察总长苏尤迪·阿里奥·塞托(Suyudi Ario Seto)与通讯及数字事务部长梅蒂娅·哈菲德(Meutya Hafid)在雅加达举行会谈,双方决定加强执法协调,重点打击网络赌博、网络诈骗、爱情诈骗以及个人数据非法买卖等违法活动。 根据官方消息,双方将结合网络犯罪预防、数字安全教育及警方执法行动,加快处理民众举报,并加强对跨国犯罪网络的监管与打击。 印尼方面表示,网络犯罪已成为影响社会安全的重要问题,未来将进一步加强部门间合作,切断犯罪团伙利用互联网实施诈骗及非法赌博活动的渠道,防止更多民众受害。 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

10 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

泰国男子偷39件女性内衣被捕 泰国春武里府一名33岁摩托车修理店老板因偷窃女性内衣被警方逮捕,缴获内衣39件。失主将监控录像发布上网后锁定嫌犯。警方到店抓捕时,该男子试图藏匿赃物未果。 他供称长期失眠,看到女性内衣便产生玩弄欲望,夜间把玩后才入睡。尿检还显示其可能吸DU。警方已以偷窃和吸毒两项罪名立案处理。 PS:哪位群友?🤣 关注大事件频道➡️ @txotxo 投稿:@bt555

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,940 posts we hold for @txotxo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚大事件” (@txotxo), 49,327 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/txotxo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.