Channel
@wospitanieummi
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
876subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315917792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wospitanieummi |
| Created | 17 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wospitanieummi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @wospitanieummi/843 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 20:17 UTC | @islamdetyam/141216 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @islamdetyam | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @islamdetyam (6–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 March 2026 to 26 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @wospitanieummi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 876 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 879 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 876 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 871 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 868 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 868 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 869 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Сказал он (шейх), да смилуется над ним ВСЕВЫШНИЙ АЛЛАХ : «Также было достоверно установлено, что тела мучеников не тлеют, так что же тогда говорить о телах пророков? Как сказал аль-Бухари, да смилуется над ним АЛЛАХ : "Рассказал нам Мусаддад, сказал рассказал нам Бишр ибн аль-Муфаддаль, сказал рассказал нам Хусейн аль-Муаллим от Аты, от Джабира (да будет доволен ими обоими АЛЛАХ ), который сказал: 'Когда приблизилас…
قصة الصحابي الذي لم يتغير جسده في القبر ستة أشهر .. https://youtu.be/LY9lmavHBEI
Коран, Сура Аль Бакара, второе качество Корана - верное руководство для богобоязненных! Худа — то, посредством чего человек выводится из заблуждения и сомнений и направляется на путь, ведущий к полезным дорогам Слово «هُدًى» употреблено без зависимого слова (хазф аль-ма‘муль) Это указывает на всеобщность (умум): Коран — руководство абсолютно для всех интересов обоих миров Коран наставляет: В основах религии (усуль) …
Коран, сура Аль Бакара 2 - 5, Аят 2: правило отрицания https://newhaj.com/quran-al-baqarah-1-5/ Разбор аята «Это Книга, в которой нет сомнения». Узнайте истинный смысл указания на Коран и почему это выражение является высшей похвалой. В этом видео мы проводим детальный тафсир Корана, фокусируясь на втором аяте суры Аль-Бакара. Мы анализируем лингвистические особенности указательного местоимения, определяя, как имен…
Коран, Сура аль Бакара, 2 - 4. Буквы в начале сур Корана Что такое хуруф мукатта'а и почему они начинаются с определенных букв? Разбираем значение этих таинственных символов в Коране. В этом выпуске мы анализируем буквы Корана, которые открывают некоторые суры священного текста. Из 28 знаков арабского алфавита для этого используются только 14. Вы узнаете, почему эти сочетания вызывают дискуссии среди ученых и каки…
Коран, Сура Аль Бакара 2 - 3. Цели и содержание суры «аль-Бакара» https://newhaj.com/quran-al-baqarah-1-5/ Утверждает основы знания (усуль аль-‘ильм) и правила религии Разъясняет категории людей (верующие, неверующие, лицемеры) Опровергает приверженцев лжи — в особенности Людей Писания (иудеев и христиан) и развеивает их сомнения Приводит подробности шариатских постановлений Открывается с упоминания достоинства Кора…
Коран, Сура Аль Бакара 2 - 2. Как сподвижники изучали Коран https://newhaj.com/quran-al-baqarah-1-5/ Сегодня «прочитал суру» обычно означает простое заучивание слов наизусть Это можно сделать за 2 недели – месяц при хорошей памяти Сподвижники учили иначе — некоторые годами заучивали одну суру «аль-Бакара» Например, Ибн Умар и Умар (да будет доволен ими АЛЛАХ) Они объединяли знание и дело (аль-‘ильм ва-ль-‘амаль) Зауч…
Video, posted without a caption
Представлен конспект аудио урока в формате ПДФ. Полный урок можно найти на странице: https://newhaj.com/quran-al-baqarah-1-5/
https://newhaj.com/shohada-uhud/
https://newhaj.com/ru/arabskie-istochniki-o-drevnej-strane-bulgar
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wospitanieummi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воспитание уммы!” (@wospitanieummi), 876 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wospitanieummi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.