Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прекрасная жизнь.

Channel

Прекрасная жизнь.

@ishi_shastye

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,072subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447518657
TypeChannel
Username@ishi_shastye
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ishi_shastye

Growth

1,0701,0741,0726 August 2026 — 1,072 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,072 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,071 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,074 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,072 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 12 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,069–1,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 14:281,072-2
15 Aug 2026, 17:531,074+4
12 Aug 2026, 10:241,070-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:111,071-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:361,072no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:351,072first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 1,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (19 April 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,554
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 22:31 UTC460 viewsread 6 August 2026

📜Сказал Ибн аль-Каййим, да помилует его АЛЛАҺ: «И поистине, все разумные люди каждой общины единодушны в том, что наслаждение не достигается через наслаждение! И что тот, кто предпочел покой — не достигнет покоя! И что радость и удовольствие бывают в прямой зависемости от того, насколько человек идет на трудности и терпит тяготы..! Нет радости у того, у кого нет забот! И нет наслаждения у того, у кого нет те

29 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC332 viewsread 6 August 2026

📜 Это отрывок из книги "Спланируй свой Ахират", глава "Прислушайся к тому, кто испытал"📜: ❗ "Помню я навестил одного из своих пожилых знакомых 20 лет назад. Он уже умер. Но когда мы пришли к нему, он лежал на смертном одре. Он был из знати богачей, из тех, кто занимает высокие посты. Перед ним на деревянной подставке лежал открытый Куръан. И он начал рассказывать о своей жизни. Сказал: "Я испытал все мирские

23 Jul 2026, 02:38 UTC522 viewsread 6 August 2026

📌 Сказал шейх Абдур-Раззак ибн Абдуль-Мухсин аль-Бадр, да хранит его АЛЛАҺ: "Счастье в Руках АЛЛАҺА, и оно не достигается иначе, как через покорность АЛЛАҺУ, تبارك وتعالى . Давайте хорошо запомним это и будем обучать ему наших детей, распространять его в наших кругах, среди наших братьев и любимых. Это краткое предложение, которое избавляет от длинных речей." https://t.me/ishi_shastye/372

19 Jun 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 6 August 2026

📌 Сказал Всевышний АЛЛАҺ: ﴿وَمِنهُم مَن يَقولُ رَبَّنا آتِنا فِي الدُّنيا حَسَنَةً وَفِي الآخِرَةِ حَسَنَةً وَقِنا عَذابَ النّارِ﴾ [البقرة: ٢٠١] «Среди них есть такие, которые говорят: “Господь наш! Даруй нам добро в этом мире и добро в Последней жизни и защити нас от мучений в Огне”» [Аль-Бакара: 201] * Это дуа — из самых всеобъемлющих ду'а. Пророк ﷺ часто его произносил, и передаётся, что это было его самое част

15 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC698 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahlusunna_djamaa_yemen

📌 Сказал имам ибн аль-Каййим, да помилует его АЛЛАҺ: «Ключ к уделу (ризку) — это стремление, с истигфаром и богобоязненностью». [«هادي الأرواح» 100] * Ибн аль-Каййим указывает, что для увеличения удела нужны три вещи вместе: 1. первое: السَّعيُ — действие, труд, поиск дозволенных способов заработка. 2. второе: الاستغفار— частое прошение прощения у АЛЛАҺА, потому что грехи лишают бараката в ризке. 3. третье:

3 Jun 2026, 03:21 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 6 August 2026

✅ Исцеление с помощью «Аль-Фатихи», многократное, усиленное чтение её при любой болезни из числа болезней: ❗ Сказал Ибн Каййим аль-Джаузия, да помилует его АЛЛАҺ Всевышний: «Я испытал это на себе и на других, и увидел удивительные вещи. Особенно во время пребывания в Мекке. Со мной случались мучительные боли, которые почти лишали меня способности двигаться, и это происходило во время тавафа и в другое

2 Jun 2026, 11:06 UTC709 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SheikhYahiaRu

📜✾|Успешный метод воспитания жены и детей|✾ 📂Сказал наш шейх Йахъя ибн Али аль-Хаджури, да сохранит его АЛЛАҺ и убережет: «...И из наилучшей заботы — удалять их от ослушания АЛЛАҺА: от многобожия, нововведений и суеверий. И побуждать их к повиновению АЛЛАҺУ, обучать их Книге АЛЛАҺА и Сунне Его посланника ﷺ. Прививать им любовь к полезному знанию и усердствовать в обучении их Религии АЛЛАҺА, سبحانه وتعالى , правиль

27 May 2026, 02:44 UTC871 viewsread 6 August 2026

تقبل الله منا ومنكم Пусть примет АЛЛАҺ от нас и от вас ! с праздником всех !

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ishi_shastye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 438,312 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прекрасная жизнь.” (@ishi_shastye), 1,072 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ishi_shastye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.