Posted without readable text
❤2❤🔥2🔥2
Signed Gleb

Channel
@without_subtitles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003115000899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @without_subtitles |
| Description | https://voriginalebezsubtitr.mave.digital/ Подкаст о кино XXI века в формате плей-офф |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/without_subtitles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 127 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 127 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 April 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 14,573 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
186 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 28.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 52 | 28.0% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 12.9% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 4.84% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 1.61% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2❤🔥2🔥2
Signed Gleb
Мы рады вернуться к вам после небольших летних каникул. И сразу выпуском с замечательным гостем! Вместе с Олегом Кашиным* мы обсудили шедевр Квентина Тарантино «Бесславные ублюдки» и полнометражный дебют Андрея Звягинцева, принесший ему Золотого Льва Венеции, – фильм «Возвращение». Мы подробно поговорили о принадлежности каждого из этих фильмов своей эпохе, о сказочности фильмов Тарантино и о пророческой фигуре отц…
❤4❤🔥4🔥3👍1
Signed Gleb
В новом эпизоде подкаста мы обсудили фильмы двух живых классиков европейского кино: фильм румынского режиссера Кристиана Мунджиу «4 месяца, 3 недели и 2 дня», получившим 19 лет назад Золотую Пальмовую ветвь, и о франкоязычном фильме Пола Верховена «Она» — бенефисе нашей любимой Изабель Юппер. В этом выпуске мы много говорим о насилии, социализме, власти и желаниях. И, конечно, о больших женских персонажах. 📱 Яндек…
❤🔥4❤3🔥3
Signed Gleb
Мы знаем, вы ждали! В новом эпизоде мы обсуждаем пару американского независимого кино. Вместе с кинокритиком и редактором отдела спецпроектов FILM.ru Наей Гусевой мы обсудили фильмы «Патерсон» Джима Джармуша и «Маяк» Роберта Эггерса. Мы поговорили об эволюции жанра хоррора, изменениях в авторском стиле Джармуша от 80-х до 10-х и о том, как в современному кино живут древнегреческие мифы и американская поэзия ХХ века.…
❤4❤🔥4👍3🔥1🥰1
Signed Gleb
Мы потихоньку возвращаемся в привычный график и уже через пару дней погрузимся в независимое американское кино. Мы поговорим о поэзии обыденности в фильме «Патерсон» Джима Джармуша и о синефильской интерпретации древнегреческих мифов в фильме «Маяк» Роберта Эггерса Казалось бы, что общего у двух этих фильмов? Мы постараемся найти!
❤🔥4🔥3😱2❤1
Signed Gleb
В новом эпизоде обсуждаем большие антиутопии, наследующие ХХ веку. «V — значит Вендетта» Джона Мактига — экранизация графического романа Алана Мура о насильственном сопротивлении, а «Бегущий по лезвию 2049» — продолжение блокбастера Риддли Скотта (и экранизации романа Филиппа К. Дика) о том, что такое человек. В таком непростом и мрачном мире нам пришлось принять решение о том, какой из фильмов продолжит борьбу за з…
❤🔥4😈3❤2👍1🔥1😁1
Signed Gleb
Наш следующий эпизод мы посвятим двум антиутопиям:«V — значит Вендетта» Джеймса Мактига и сиблингов Вачовски и «Бегущему по лезвию 2049» Дени Вильнева Таково тираническое решение рандомайзера, распределявшего наши пары
😁6❤3❤🔥2👍2🔥1
Signed Gleb
В новом эпизоде мы вместе с журналистом Игорем Порошиным обсудили два очень разных фильма о жизни богемы: «Квадрат» Рубена Эстлунда и «Великую красоту» Паоло Соррентино. В этом выпуске мы много говорим о бесплодии, о пошлости и, конечно, о Риме! Мы давно анонсировали этот выпуск и он наконец доступен на всех подкастных платформах: 📱 Яндекс Музыка 📱 Apple Podcasts 📱 Spotify 📱 YouTube 📱 Telegram 😀 Звук
❤🔥5🔥4❤3👍2
Signed Gleb
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4❤🔥4🔥3
Signed Gleb
В нашем новом квазиисторическом выпуске неожиданно столкнулись «Князь Владимир» Юрия Кулакова и «Однажды в Голливуде» Квентина Тарантино Кто победил в схватке Древней Руси против Старого Голливуда, Медведя против Чарли Мэнсона, магического посоха против чеховского огнемета — ответ уже доступен на всех подкастных платформах 📱 Яндекс Музыка 📱 Apple Podcasts 📱 Spotify 📱 YouTube 📱 Telegram 😀 Звук
❤4❤🔥2👍2🔥2😁1
Signed Gleb
Пока вы активно слушаете наш лирический выпуск о «Страсти Додена Буфана» и «Пепле самом чистом белом» мы с радостью анонсируем наш следующий эпизод Он будет посвящен двум фантазиям на исторические темы. Мы поговорим о культовом мультфильме «Князь Владимир» Юрия Кулакова и еще более культовом «Однажды в Голливуде» Квентина Таратино Справится ли Клифф Бутт с Владимиром Красным Солнышком? Узнаем уже на этой неделе!
❤3👍3❤🔥2🤣2🔥1😁1
Signed Gleb
В новом эпизоде мы обсуждаем две истории необычной любви: «Рецепт любви», также известный как «Страсть Додена Буфана» (Чхан Ан Гук) и «Пепел — самый чистый белый» (Цзя Чжанкэ). «Рецепт любви» — ода французской кулинарной традиции и попытка переноса в кино «языка вкуса» — самого загадочного из человеческих чувств в исполнении великих французских актеров: Жюльет Бинош и Бенуа Мажимеля. «Пепел — самый чистый белый» — …
❤7🔥5👍4❤🔥1
Signed Gleb
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @without_subtitles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 239,067 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В оригинале без субтитров” (@without_subtitles), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/without_subtitles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.