Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

В оригинале без субтитров

@without_subtitles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003115000899
TypeChannel
Username@without_subtitles
Descriptionhttps://voriginalebezsubtitr.mave.digital/ Подкаст о кино XXI века в формате плей-офф
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/without_subtitles

Growth

1276 August 2026 — 127 subscribers9 August 2026 — 127 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:02127no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51127first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5737.4%
avg views ÷ 127 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,290
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.124%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held15 (6 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total14,573
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Links
34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5228.0%
❤‍🔥5228.0%
🔥3820.4%
👍2412.9%
😁94.84%
😈31.61%
😱21.08%
🤣21.08%
🍾10.538%
🐳10.538%
😍10.538%
🥰10.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC173 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2❤‍🔥2🔥2

Signed Gleb

29 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈14,400 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы рады вернуться к вам после небольших летних каникул. И сразу выпуском с замечательным гостем! Вместе с Олегом Кашиным* мы обсудили шедевр Квентина Тарантино «Бесславные ублюдки» и полнометражный дебют Андрея Звягинцева, принесший ему Золотого Льва Венеции, – фильм «Возвращение». Мы подробно поговорили о принадлежности каждого из этих фильмов своей эпохе, о сказочности фильмов Тарантино и о пророческой фигуре отц

4❤‍🔥4🔥3👍1

Signed Gleb

30 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC285 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В новом эпизоде подкаста мы обсудили фильмы двух живых классиков европейского кино: фильм румынского режиссера Кристиана Мунджиу «4 месяца, 3 недели и 2 дня», получившим 19 лет назад Золотую Пальмовую ветвь, и о франкоязычном фильме Пола Верховена «Она» — бенефисе нашей любимой Изабель Юппер. В этом выпуске мы много говорим о насилии, социализме, власти и желаниях. И, конечно, о больших женских персонажах. 📱 Яндек

❤‍🔥43🔥3

Signed Gleb

19 Jun 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,270 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы знаем, вы ждали! В новом эпизоде мы обсуждаем пару американского независимого кино. Вместе с кинокритиком и редактором отдела спецпроектов FILM.ru Наей Гусевой мы обсудили фильмы «Патерсон» Джима Джармуша и «Маяк» Роберта Эггерса. Мы поговорили об эволюции жанра хоррора, изменениях в авторском стиле Джармуша от 80-х до 10-х и о том, как в современному кино живут древнегреческие мифы и американская поэзия ХХ века.

4❤‍🔥4👍3🔥1🥰1

Signed Gleb

8 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC166 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мы потихоньку возвращаемся в привычный график и уже через пару дней погрузимся в независимое американское кино. Мы поговорим о поэзии обыденности в фильме «Патерсон» Джима Джармуша и о синефильской интерпретации древнегреческих мифов в фильме «Маяк» Роберта Эггерса Казалось бы, что общего у двух этих фильмов? Мы постараемся найти!

❤‍🔥4🔥3😱21

Signed Gleb

2 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC293 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В новом эпизоде обсуждаем большие антиутопии, наследующие ХХ веку. «V — значит Вендетта» Джона Мактига — экранизация графического романа Алана Мура о насильственном сопротивлении, а «Бегущий по лезвию 2049» — продолжение блокбастера Риддли Скотта (и экранизации романа Филиппа К. Дика) о том, что такое человек. В таком непростом и мрачном мире нам пришлось принять решение о том, какой из фильмов продолжит борьбу за з

❤‍🔥4😈32👍1🔥1😁1

Signed Gleb

19 May 2026, 12:55 UTC160 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наш следующий эпизод мы посвятим двум антиутопиям:«V — значит Вендетта» Джеймса Мактига и сиблингов Вачовски и «Бегущему по лезвию 2049» Дени Вильнева Таково тираническое решение рандомайзера, распределявшего наши пары

😁63❤‍🔥2👍2🔥1

Signed Gleb

17 May 2026, 08:04 UTC730 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В новом эпизоде мы вместе с журналистом Игорем Порошиным обсудили два очень разных фильма о жизни богемы: «Квадрат» Рубена Эстлунда и «Великую красоту» Паоло Соррентино. В этом выпуске мы много говорим о бесплодии, о пошлости и, конечно, о Риме! Мы давно анонсировали этот выпуск и он наконец доступен на всех подкастных платформах: 📱 Яндекс Музыка 📱 Apple Podcasts 📱 Spotify 📱 YouTube 📱 Telegram 😀 Звук

❤‍🔥5🔥43👍2

Signed Gleb

17 May 2026, 08:04 UTC234 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4❤‍🔥4🔥3

Signed Gleb

10 May 2026, 16:03 UTC339 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В нашем новом квазиисторическом выпуске неожиданно столкнулись «Князь Владимир» Юрия Кулакова и «Однажды в Голливуде» Квентина Тарантино Кто победил в схватке Древней Руси против Старого Голливуда, Медведя против Чарли Мэнсона, магического посоха против чеховского огнемета — ответ уже доступен на всех подкастных платформах 📱 Яндекс Музыка 📱 Apple Podcasts 📱 Spotify 📱 YouTube 📱 Telegram 😀 Звук

4❤‍🔥2👍2🔥2😁1

Signed Gleb

5 May 2026, 11:26 UTC158 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пока вы активно слушаете наш лирический выпуск о «Страсти Додена Буфана» и «Пепле самом чистом белом» мы с радостью анонсируем наш следующий эпизод Он будет посвящен двум фантазиям на исторические темы. Мы поговорим о культовом мультфильме «Князь Владимир» Юрия Кулакова и еще более культовом «Однажды в Голливуде» Квентина Таратино Справится ли Клифф Бутт с Владимиром Красным Солнышком? Узнаем уже на этой неделе!

3👍3❤‍🔥2🤣2🔥1😁1

Signed Gleb

3 May 2026, 12:05 UTC272 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В новом эпизоде мы обсуждаем две истории необычной любви: «Рецепт любви», также известный как «Страсть Додена Буфана» (Чхан Ан Гук) и «Пепел — самый чистый белый» (Цзя Чжанкэ). «Рецепт любви» — ода французской кулинарной традиции и попытка переноса в кино «языка вкуса» — самого загадочного из человеческих чувств в исполнении великих французских актеров: Жюльет Бинош и Бенуа Мажимеля. «Пепел — самый чистый белый» —

7🔥5👍4❤‍🔥1

Signed Gleb

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @without_subtitles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 239,067 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В оригинале без субтитров” (@without_subtitles), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/without_subtitles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.