Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Windy의 투자공방

@windy_zeroroom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716261305
TypeChannel
Username@windy_zeroroom
Description투자에 대한 기록과 생각들을 적어 놓습니다. https://zeroroom.tistory.com https://t.me/windy_zeroroom
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/windy_zeroroom

Growth

1381421407 Aug 2026, 15:44 — 138 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:41 — 142 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:47 — 142 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:448 Aug 2026, 21:47
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:47142no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:41142+4
7 Aug 2026, 15:44138first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.073%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,812
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
976
Videos
31
Links
1,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>Berkshire Hathaway 2분기 순이익 2배 증가, 분기 자사주 매입 5년 만에 최대…Alphabet, 5대 보유 종목 진입 •Berkshire Hathaway는 2분기에 자사주 45억2700만 달러어치를 매입했음. 1분기 자사주 매입 규모가 약 2억3500만 달러에 불과했던 것과 비교하면 크게 증가한 수준임. 상반기 누적 자사주 매입 규모는 약 47억6000만 달러였으며, 대부분의 매입이 2분기에 집중 •2분기 순이익은 전년 동기 대비 2배 증가했음. 동시에 Berkshire Hathaway는 2분기에 주식을 약 198억 달러 순매수했으며, 이 가운데 약 100억 달러를 Alphabet 보통주 매입에 투입. 이에 따라 Alphabet이 Berkshire Hathaway의 5대 보유 종목에 공식적으로 진입 >伯克希尔Q2净利润

8 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bzcftel

리콴유 총리 인터뷰. 남녀 평등, 동성애, 미혼모, 공산주의, 젊은이들의 정치, 경제 위기, 노조, 사랑 수 많은 주제에 대해서 폭넓게 다룹니다. 생각보다 더 열려있는 사람이라서 놀랐습니다. 각 주제에 대해서 자기 주장이 확고하고 담백하여 시원하다고 생각했고요. 확실한 사람인 것 같습니다. 날이 선선합니다. 즐거운 밤 되시길 바라며 공유합니다. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J_aOju4q6o

8 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,370 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

그거슨.. 압도적 가성비일 것으로...ㅠㅠ

😭1

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @songjongsik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSqg6sDweKw

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @songjongsik

권모술수가 가득한 나라의 전자제품을 쓰는 이유가 도대체 뭘까.

8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hedgehara

그리고 아무도 책임을 안 졌군요 기금위에서는 정부 부처가 일관되게 허용범위 확대를 밀어붙였다. 기금위에 대체로 참석하지 않았던 김용범 당시 기재부 1차관(現 청와대 정책실장)은 3차 회의에 참석해 "구조적 변화에 비참여 리스크가 훨씬 더 크다"며 "2011년 이래 10년간 경직적으로 운영된 벤치마크를 정상화해야 한다"며 가장 인상 폭이 큰 1안(±3.5%p)을 밀었다. 당시 민간위원들이 우려했던 '원칙 훼손'의 대가는 1년 뒤 숫자로 나타났다. 2021년에 뚫린 방어막은 2022년 국내 주식 부문 마이너스(-) 22.8%라는 최악의 성적표와 기금 전체 79조6천억 원 손실이라는 결과로 이어졌다. 해외 주식은 12.34% 하락에 그친 점을 고려하면, 국내 주식 비중 확대가 기금 손실 확대로 이어진 셈이다. 출처 : 연합인포맥스(https:

8 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @songjongsik

ㄴ 조만간 서학개미 규제 및 압박 들어올 여지 있습니다.

8 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @songjongsik

https://n.news.naver.com/article/123/0002388045

8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stbridgee

이상렬이도 옷 벗어라 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/449/0000356064?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=001

8 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @areadinginvestor

되돌아봤을 때 '이해할 수 없을 만큼 심하게 떨어졌구나'라는 생각이 드는 주가 변동은 있기 마련이다. 이런 상황에서 기계적인 손절매 규칙을 정해 놓으면 '쓸모없는 손절매'를 해 버릴 수 잇다. 평가손을 볼 것 같아서 판다든가, 다른 곳에서 손해를 봤다는 이유로 이익이 나는 포지션을 청산하는 것은 시장이나 종목과는 전혀 상관이 없는 개인의 사정이다. 그런 이유로 본래 더 이익을 낼 수 있엇을 우량 포지션을 청산한다면 자산이 불어나지 않는다. 트레이더는 주가가 일정 수준 변동하면 파는 방식으로 이익을 쌓아 나가기에 자산이 직선을 그리듯이 불어나곤 한다. 펀더멘탈 기반의 중장기 투자자는 주가가 2배, 3배, 때로는 5~10배가 되는 소수의 대성공 포지션을 통해 계단 형태의 자산 증식을 노린다. 순수한 트레이딩이라면 기계적인 손절매도 중요하다

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @windy_zeroroom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,095,844 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Windy의 투자공방” (@windy_zeroroom), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/windy_zeroroom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.