Channel
@white_spade44
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
21,361subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001253135411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @white_spade44 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/white_spade44 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 21,361 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 21,370 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 21,367 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 21,369 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 21,372 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 21,370 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 21,379 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 21,382 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 21,383 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 21,385 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
How was the paper guys?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
File, posted without a caption
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Hello Guys! Hope all of you are doing well. Mains is coming up and many of you have been requesting for the Evernotes link to my Geology Notes, which is generally not available in the market. Here I am sharing a pdf which has links to many of my online notes on Geology. There are not complete notes as a majority of the notes were in form of physical registers and those cannot be scanned. I am sharing whatever can be…
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
How was the Csat paper guy?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
How was the GS paper guys?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
A good group where you can get your answers evaluated and receive important feedback. This is an initiative of my friend Sachin Yadav, IPS. https://t.me/WE_ASSIST
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Congratulations to everyone who got selected !! Welcome aboard! 😃🥂
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Thanks a lot for joining and due to the maximum size of 100 at a time... Many of your requests were declined... It has nothing to do with me 'hating' late comers ... As someone rightly said... Even I was 3 minutes late 😂 Hope this session was helpful to some of you. Nandri D.
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
https://meet.google.com/ndv-eqyb-ved
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
And it's not an April's Fool prank 😂
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Google Meet Session today at 1230
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Sorry got some work today. Have to cancel it. Will conduct it soon.
Signed Divyanshu Nigam
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @white_spade44. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How was the paper guys?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How was the Csat paper guy?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How was the GS paper guys?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Google Meet Session today at 1230
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
One interactive session today? 1130 am
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2022 to 24 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Divyanshu Nigam IAS Resources/Tips” (@white_spade44), 21,361 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/white_spade44.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.