Channel
@ApoorvIFS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,444subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001547219497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ApoorvIFS |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ApoorvIFS |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:08 | 5,444 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:14 | 5,447 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 5,444 | +4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 5,440 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 5,443 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 5,442 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 5,445 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 5,444 | -9 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 5,453 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 5,455 | -5 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 5,460 | +14 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 5,446 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 5,441 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
646 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 466 | 72.1% | |
| 👍 | 163 | 25.2% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.929% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.619% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2023 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A Community-Led Employment Initiative for UPSC Aspirants - Your years of preparation have value, and that value deserves fair and timely compensation. We are connecting UPSC aspirants with coaching institutions across India and Training interested candidates develop the skills required to succeed in these roles, even if they have no prior experience. If you would like to explore such opportunities, fill out the form…
👍3❤2
Hello everyone I'm sharing this for the benefit of all the aspirants. This is a new essay channel started by one of my friend, mentor and senior. His marks speak for themselves. I'm sure you'll be able to benefit from his experience and guidance. All the best!
❤10
Hello everyone! I am Arun Kumar. Having scored 159, 144, and 135 in the UPSC CSE Essay paper, I have started a Telegram channel to simplify essay writing. This channel is for aspirants who: • Don't know how to approach an essay • Are stuck at low scores • Score around 95–105 but struggle to reach 130+ • Face inconsistency across attempts My primary focus is decoding the last 10 years of UPSC Essay papers, especial…
❤9
Hello people I've made a private group for people giving IFS Mains this year, i.e. 2025. All those who've cleared Forest prelims this time, can DM me (@Apoorv_IFS) your admit card or its screenshot with Prelims result screenshot, so that I can forward the link to you. The purpose of the group is to form a community where I can share the resources that I have and others can share their resources for common good of …
❤29👍16
File, posted without a caption
This is for those who have taken my Forestry Course at Planet Geology. "How to use Forestry Course? For those who are doing two optionals from scratch, you shouldn't spend more than 2 weeks on Forestry optional. If you have already prepared one optional (for CSE or earlier), you can devote 20 days to it. But not more than that. There is limited marginal utility in that. Focus on your primary optional in the remain…
❤26👍19😢2😁1
Hello everyone! This is for those giving IFS Mains this year. Please forward this message to people who are giving Forest Mains this year. They can make do with some help. Now that you are done with CSE Mains, it's time to throw yourself into IFS Mains preparation. I'm taking a session to help you through this phase. Some of you must be overwhelmed by the thought of preparing two optionals from scratch. Trust me, …
👍22❤7
Hii everyone! UPSC Prelims result is out. It's time to prepare for Mains. Like every year, I'll try to help out those appearing in Forest Mains. There are three types of candidates who'd be appearing in IFS Mains 2024 - 1. Who just filed form for IFS and would be appearing in IFS Mains 2024. 2. Who filed form for both IFS as well as CSE and would be preparing for Forest Mains after writing CSE Mains in September. …
👍21❤5
IFoS Verified ✅
👍4❤2
Verified ✅
👍2
Hello all! A live interactive session is scheduled for 1st June taken by Kavya and Medha, two very bright newly selected officers, organised by Planet Geology. You can interact with them in the session. But post your questions in the Google Doc link shared here also in advance so that they can prepare accordingly. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSecoBBRB3gtn5FzM9t8_i9CP4KUwrfYjgK3uRXq2X8iN_ksxg/viewform?v…
👍10
Happy Republic Day 🇮🇳
❤42👍5👏3🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ApoorvIFS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apoorv IFS Rank 11” (@ApoorvIFS), 5,444 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApoorvIFS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.