Channel
@web3IoT
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001726755206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web3IoT |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 9 times, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web3IoT |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @web3IoT/238 · this entry25 May 2023, 11:38 UTC | @beuropro/134925 May 2023, 11:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @beuropro | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 May 2023 to 9 June 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @web3IoT — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 19 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 20 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2023 to 9 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍️ NFT royalties refer to the ongoing payments that creators receive when their non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are resold in the secondary market. NFTs are unique digital assets that can represent various forms of digital or tangible items, such as artwork, collectibles, music, videos, or virtual real estate. 🔥 When an NFT is initially sold by the creator, they can choose to include a royalty percentage in the smart con…
👍1
NFTs Spotlight Fashion, sports, games, and artwork; the world of NFTs benefits both the artist and the holder. Not only is it an excellent opportunity for digital artists to have control over the ownership of the assets and then have a greater right to royalties, but it also allows the owner to access exclusive royalties. Here are some of the freshest news in the universe of Smart Contracts. #nftart #nftartist #no…
💯 NFTs are transforming social experiences in the metaverse. E.x: NFT avatars, which serve as digital extensions of players, can be used as access tokens to move between different locations within the metaverse. In addition, NFT ownership can symbolize a status, support a project or communicate points of view in the virtual world. In the metaverse, NFTs also enable true ownership of virtual real estate. This means…
NFTs are no longer a trend but a marketing strategy. ✍️ More and more companies are integrating blockchain technology as an opportunity to expand sales and generate revenue, reaching a wider audience. 💯 Nvidia, one of the most important technology companies currently leading the market, has set out to create an augmented reality platform to drive the creation of NFTs. The company believes that non-fungible tokens …
✍️ The emergence of Web3, an evolution of the internet built on decentralized technologies such as blockchain, has brought about significant advancements in various domains. Let's explore the relationship between Web3 and online privacy, assessing whether pursuing decentralization necessitates sacrificing our privacy.🤔 - Web3: Enabling Decentralization: Web3 refers to a set of technologies and principles that seek…
✍️ Tokenization comes with certain risks that need to be considered 1. Loss of Tangibility and Aura: Tokenization inherently involves the digitization of physical assets. While this enhances accessibility, it may diminish the physical experience and aura associated with art and cultural artifacts. 2. Security and Fraud Risks: Smart contracts and token platforms can be subject to hacking attempts, fraud, and data br…
✍️While tokenization offers various potential benefits, it also comes with certain risks that need to be considered ✔️ Enhanced Copyright Protection: Tokenization can provide artists and creators with better control over their intellectual property rights. ✔️Cultural Preservation: Tokenization allows for the preservation and digitization of cultural assets, including artifacts, historical documents, and traditional…
Tokenization, which involves creating digital tokens that represent ownership or value, has gained significant attention in the art and cultural sectors. Benefits of Tokenization: 1. Increased Accessibility: Tokenization can democratize access to art and culture by breaking down barriers to entry. It allows individuals to own fractions of high-value assets, enabling wider participation in the art market. 2. Liquid…
Did you know owning an NFT does not necessarily grant the buyer copyright ownership of the underlying content.🤔 ✍️The creator still retains the copyright, unless explicitly transferred or licensed to the buyer. Therefore, even if someone purchases an NFT, they may not have the right to reproduce or distribute the content associated with it. - Licensing and Terms of Use: Creators can sell NFTs with licensing terms t…
NFTs and cultural appropriation: Who has the right to benefit from art and culture in the digital age? ✍️Cultural appropriation refers to the adoption, borrowing, or imitation of elements from another culture, particularly when it is done by a dominant culture or without proper understanding, respect, or consent. 💯 In the context of NFTs, cultural appropriation can occur when digital art or cultural artifacts from…
Bitcoin (BTC) About To Flash Signal That ‘Historically’ Marks Beginning of Fresh Bull Runs: Analyst PlanB https://dailyhodl.com/2023/05/29/bitcoin-btc-about-to-flash-signal-that-historically-marks-beginning-of-fresh-bull-runs-analyst-planb/
Decentralization (Statistic) Decentralization is still in its early stages, but it's already attracting much attention from developers, investors, and users. Did you know 🤔 * The top five countries for Web3 investment 2022: US the UK, China, Japan, and Singapore. * 2022 top five sectors for Web3 investment: Gaming, DeFi, NFTs, infrastructure, and Metaverse. ✜In 2022, Web3 startups raised $32 billion in funding,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @web3IoT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain, Web3 and Crypto” (@web3IoT), 19 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3IoT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.