4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,575–2,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:28
2,576
-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:26
2,578
-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:04
2,582
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:48
2,582
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
130 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
45.4%
👍
35
26.9%
🔥
19
14.6%
🙏
10
7.69%
😱
3
2.31%
👏
2
1.54%
😈
1
0.769%
😢
1
0.769%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2025 to 20 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dear Wiki Cat Holders,
During the previous surge to a $22 million market cap, our Telegram group—while intended as a space for community engagement—unfortunately became a vulnerability.
Several newcomers lost funds after falling victim to scammers impersonating admins and sharing harmful links.
We’ve learned from that experience.
Now that we’ve built the SMC DAO App, we’re confident that such incidents will not h…
Believers,
Today by 4pm (UTC), we will send to your email a promotional kit.
If you have registered on SMC DAO before 1st of June, 2025. You will get the email.
This email contains a link that you’ll click and it will open a Google doc.
Inside that Google doc is links to videos, gifs, articles and threads on @smcdao app and @Peniwallet
Use today to download all images, videos and gifs.
Open the article and threa…
Dear SMC DAO Community,
With @Peniwallet and @smcdao Apps launching on May 31st, we’re equipping you with everything you need to spread the word professionally and powerfully.
📢Official Launch Assets will be Available this Friday, May 30th at 8 PM UTC+1.
A broadcast email will be sent to all 21,400 members registered on our DAO with:
1. Download links for all assets (Social Media Flyers & Banners (All sizes: Twitt…
Believers,
I have just learnt that one of our community asset which is the SMC Futures Group on telegram has just been stolen.
Someone took the group private and renamed it.
After all the hardwork that was put into that group.
We grew it to 4,500 Subscribers.
I'm so angry with myself that I was too focused on finishing up both apps.
I'm sorry to the traders affected.
I will start over again and put in a more co…
Later this week, get ready! 🚀 A crypto firm will be introduced with exclusive offers tailored just for our community 🎁.
Stay tuned! 📺
If you have any questions, feel free to ask 🤔
❤4👍1
Signed Kenny₿
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smcfutures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 378,210 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@smcfutures named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@smcdao named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SMC Futures” (@smcfutures), 2,576 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smcfutures.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
