Channel
@vrn_one
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001795914158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vrn_one |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 9 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vrn_one |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @chernyankaN1 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @chernyankaN1 (6–3) |
| @new_oskol | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 July 2022 to 17 June 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @vrn_one — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 2 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Самый противоречивый канал Белгорода 👉 БЕДгород Публикуют важные и интересные новости, а так же объективно выступают в роли политического обозревателя Белгородской области! Подпишись ✌🏻 https://t.me/+58YHK2mjwxM5ZDYy
🛡Вы просили — мы вам дали! 🤙 Настоящий Гладков 🔦 Фонарь 📰 БЕЛ.ру 🧳 Коммерсантъ 🃏 БЕДгород ❗️ Кто, если не Климов 🗞 Белгород Best ✍️ Маслов 🔎 БелПресса 🗿Белгородский осведомитель 👣 БелТру 😨 Е***ал я такую работу 👽 POV: Белгород 🤬 Старый Оскол без цензуры 🥷🏻 Белгородский джедай 🚽 Тупа Ливсон Даня 🤦🏻♂️ Типичный Белгород 🌳 Короча наизнанку 🤫 Шёпот Шебекино 👔 Акценты средней полосы 🫐 Сливы с рынка 👁 Белгородские подробн…
Валуеву пришла повестка. Делаем ставки: врет или поедет? 👍- поедет | 👎 - врет
❗️Нового председателя колхоза им. Горина Виталия Артюха похитили неизвестные в Белгородкой области По нашим данным, его остановили сотрудники ДПС. Пока один проверял документы, ещё двое пошли куда-то звонить. Через время подъехала машина без номеров, Артюха похитили. Журналистам сообщили, что около 12:30 Виталий Артюх с личным водителем поехал домой на обед. Возле дома неизвестные люди с участием сотрудников ГИБДД …
⚡️‼️ Пенсионер расстрелял депутата единороса и его жену под Курском В селе Большое Долженково Октябрьского района произошла трагедия. 65-летний Геннадий Волобуев застрелил Игоря Звягинцева, депутата от «Единой России» Большедолженковской сельсовета и его жену из охотничьего ружья. Причиной всему стал земельный вопрос между соседями, который они долго не могли решить. В один момент терпение у пенсионера лопнуло, он в…
❗️Мы понимаем, что многие негативно относятся к СВО, но помочь беженцам с Украины стоит, они не виноваты в том что происходит! Если кто-то хочет им помочь, то просто переведите любую сумму Юлии Немчиновой из организации «Десятый круг». Эти ребята помогают беженцам практически с самого начала. Им можно доверять. Помочь им можно по ссылке 👉 https://www.tinkoff.ru/cf/8ePwENahJRq Чат волонтеров: https://t.me/desyatiyK…
🗳 Из полученных журналистами записей камер в УИК следует, что на выборах в 2021 году было сфальсифицировано около трети голосов. Тут не надо быть гением, чтобы понять, почему на предстоящих выборах решили отказаться вообще от видеонаблюдения, и даже убрали участников с правом совещательного голоса. Я уже вижу как депутаты обсуждают новую статью «о дискредитации выборов».
Вызывают приставы, потому что не удаляю это (https://youtu.be/mG5e17-k2Fc) видео про вора Видашева. Извините, придти не смогу.
📈 Росстат поймали на махинациях со статистикой по доходам россиян. В июльском докладе «О социально экономическом положении» страны Росстат отчитался: реальные располагаемые доходы — то есть сумма, которая остается на руках после учета инфляции и всех обязательных платежей, — снизились по итогам второго квартала на 0,8%. Кварталом ранее граждане РФ, согласно Росстату, обеднели на 1,2%. А за полугодие (то есть первый…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vrn_one. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vrn_one named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Красивый Воронеж” (@vrn_one), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vrn_one.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.