Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Блэтгород

@bletgorod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

106,566subscribers

+1,222 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224288286
TypeChannel
Username@bletgorod
DescriptionПредложить новость: @Bletgorod2bot По поводу рекламы: @belgorod_ads ✅ Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6891e0fc153f4e05119d4a25 Купить рекламу через биржу: https://telega.in/c/bletgorod
Created7 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bletgorod

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

105,326106,566105,9465 August 2026 — 105,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 105,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 105,347 subscribers7 August 2026 — 105,336 subscribers8 August 2026 — 105,326 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 106,468 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,530 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,566 subscribers5 August 202611 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,140–106,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:57106,566+36
11 Aug 2026, 01:17106,530+62
10 Aug 2026, 03:03106,468+318
9 Aug 2026, 06:11106,150+824
8 Aug 2026, 03:01105,326-10
7 Aug 2026, 01:45105,336-11
6 Aug 2026, 02:50105,347+3
6 Aug 2026, 01:33105,344no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:50105,344first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 106,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,400
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.415%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held93 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,800,700
Reactions total7,479
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,300
Videos
5,330
Links
3,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,921 reactions across 83 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53551633214294006954,60066.5%
❤‍🔥2,32133.5%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.23%
3 of 93 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
15,600
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
18,100
over 90 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquxNwcZ17 August 20267 August 2026
2VtzqvJasLs15 August 20265 August 2026
2VtzqwqwKmq15 August 20265 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈3,760 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если иностранным сервисам разрешат хранить данные граждан России на серверах в дружественных странах, Телеграм сможет заработать без ограничений, а в Белгороде оперативная информация станет доступнее. С таким предложением выступила партия «Новые люди», рассказал на встрече с белгородцами руководитель регионального отделения партии Александр Харыбин. В январе он даже предлагал открыть представительство мессенджера в

❤‍🔥27custom 535516332142940069513

12 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈9,950 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В Оперштабе подтвердили нашу информацию об атаке БПЛА на АЗС в Дубовом. Также в посёлке под удар попало предприятие. Повреждены крыша, окна и вход, а также легковушка. Пострадавших нет. @bletgorod

custom 535516332142940069528❤‍🔥6

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈12,500 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Громко над Белгородом. Ракетная опасность. Написать нам: @Bletgorod2bot

custom 535516332142940069522❤‍🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈13,600 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мужик напал на сотрудницу пресс-службы Белгорблагоустройства за то, что она снимала последствия ударов беспилотников в Белгороде. Журналистам «Фонаря» Ольга Маркова рассказала, что ночью 9 августа после первой атаки БПЛА она уже выехала в центр города для того, чтобы зафиксировать последствия обстрела. Девушка уже готовилась уезжать на другой адрес, но в этот момент случилось ещё одно возгорание — она достала фотоап

custom 535516332142940069593❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈13,200 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Мелзавод на Студенческой чёт задымил. Местная жительница говорит, что пылюка оседает на грядках в огороде, машинах и подоконниках, а дышать в жару становится тяжело. Или тут тоже пар? @bletgorod

custom 535516332142940069540❤‍🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈13,800 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С начала СВО 5627 белгородцев из приграничья получили выплаты на покупку новых домов взамен утраченных из-за обстрелов. По словам врио губернатора Шуваева, на эти цели выделили 32,5 миллиарда рублей. Сейчас власти согласовывают очередной транш на сумму в 6,1 миллиарда рублей. @bletgorod

custom 535516332142940069531❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈14,800 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ОМВД по Белгородскому округу проведёт проверку после нашего поста об издевательствах над собаками в Разумном. В областном УМВД заявили, что заявлений по факту жестокого обращения с животными в посёлке в местное отделение не поступало, а информацию об этом они нашли во время мониторинга соцсетей. При этом ещё 2 августа глава Белгородского округа Татьяна Круглякова обещала, что «передаст» обращение начальнику местной

❤‍🔥53custom 535516332142940069520

12 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈15,100 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Беспилотник ударил по территории АЗС в Дубовом. Подробности пока неизвестны. UPD: по нашим данным, обошлось без пострадавших. Связь с нами: @Bletgorod2bot

custom 535516332142940069534❤‍🔥6

12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈14,500 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @autobletgorodPhoto

Белгородские власти ограничили размер компенсации за повреждённые при обстрелах машины 400 тысячами рублей. В Оперштабе объясняют это тем, что хотят «поддержать как можно больше пострадавших собственников». Фонд, из которого перечисляют выплаты, пополняется за счёт бизнеса, поэтому власти установили ограничения для того, чтобы он «не исчерпался досрочно». Выплаты за повреждённые автомобили в Белгородской области во

custom 535516332142940069587❤‍🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈14,300 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мечты о счастливом переезде близко ❤️ Представьте себе место, где можно почувствовать себя по-настоящему хорошо. Им может быть микрорайон Восточный, ведь здесь есть всё самое нужное для комфортной жизни. 🟠 Тихие уютные дворы 🟠 Детские и спортивные площадки 🟠 Подъезды с просторными колясочными 🟠 В каждой квартире отделка «под ключ» и индивидуальное отопление ‼️ Ещё одна причина не откладывать выбор: после 1 октября

custom 53551633214294006958

12 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC≈15,800 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В кинотеатре «Радуга» теперь будут бесплатно показывать футбик, правда, отечественный. РПЛ начнут крутить в кинотеатре в прямом эфире благодаря сотрудничеству «Матч ТВ» и белгородского Минкульта. Первые трансляции уже 16 августа, зарегаться на просмотр матча «Зенита» или «Спартака» можно по ссылкам. @bletgorod

custom 535516332142940069537❤‍🔥29

11 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈21,100 views177 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На «Берегах» до конца этого года сделают качалку под открытым небом. По словам мэра Демидова, фитнес-центр разобьют на три зоны. Первое пространство предназначено для кардио — там будут шесть современных тренажёров и теннисные столы. Вторая зона — это основной зал с 45 силовыми тренажёрами, восемь из них адаптированы для маломобильных людей. Третья зона предназначена для соревнований, там установят профессиональны

❤‍🔥144custom 535516332142940069533

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @bletgorod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,705 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пепел ➜ Белгород
@belpepel · 164,207
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Белгород №1
@belgorod01 · 192,490
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Жесть Белгород
@zhest_belgorod · 594,908
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 August 2026
Настоящий Гладков
@vvgladkov · 429,844
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Труха⚡️Харків | Новини
@truexakharkiv · 576,666
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
Харьков life | Харків 🇺🇦
@kharkivlife · 672,193
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 August 2026
Харків 1654 | Місто-герой 🇺🇦
@kharkiv_1654 · 241,972
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
Хуйовий Харків 🇺🇦 Хуевый Харьков
@huyovy_kharkiv · 466,222
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блэтгород” (@bletgorod), 106,566 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bletgorod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.