Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for За чистый воздух в Челябинске

Channel

За чистый воздух в Челябинске

@vozduhchel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699397347
TypeChannel
Username@vozduhchel
DescriptionЗа Чистый воздух в Челябинске
Created23 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vozduhchel

Growth

777 August 2026 — 77 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 20:1677no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:1077first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
224
Videos
51
Links
295

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14m 09s
Average length
3m 32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2115.6%
😱2014.8%
🤬2014.8%
1914.1%
🤯139.63%
🔥96.67%
😢64.44%
🥴53.70%
😁42.96%
💩32.22%
😭32.22%
💊21.48%
💯21.48%
🤔21.48%
🤡21.48%
🤣21.48%
👏10.741%
👻10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2023 to 18 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2024, 19:45 UTC220 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @volkova_chelVideo

❗️❗️ НА ЮГК ПРОРВАЛО ДАМБУ Возможно отравление цианидами! В Пластовском районе Челябинской области прорвало дамбу на техническом водоеме компании «Южуралзолото». МЧС предупреждает о возможных отравлениях цианидами. ЧП произошло в результате паводка: водой размыло дорогу между селами Радиомайка и Верхняя Санарка. «В районе Верхней Санарки имеется цикл плотин под шламоотстойником ЮГК, вчера прорвало Мишкинскую — с с

😱7🤬2👍1

18 Apr 2024, 19:43 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravdaurfoPhoto

«Мечел-Кокс» уличили в неучтенных выбросах токсичных элементов. Промышленники просят еще подождать чистого воздуха Структура «Мечела» миллиардера Игоря Зюзина через суд попыталась отложить исполнение предписания Росприроднадзора о недопустимости неучтенных выбросов, представляющих потенциальную опасность для жителей Челябинска. Правда, за время спора промышленники умудрились пропустить все сроки, а также не смогли

🤡2🤬2

21 Mar 2024, 13:31 UTC172 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravdaurfoPhoto

Под Челябинском пустили под застройку бывшие участки ООПТ «Каштакский бор». На землях, лишенных охранного статуса, начали возводить коттеджи. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО»

🤬9💩2

29 Feb 2024, 06:45 UTC186 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravdaurfoPhoto

Прокуратура изучит провалы проекта «Чистая вода» в Челябинской области. После освоения 26 миллионов люди получают в дома техническую воду. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО»

😱3💯2😁2😭2

19 Feb 2024, 16:47 UTC184 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @volkova_chel

ЧЕМ ЗАПОМНИЛСЯ ЧЕЛЯБИНЦАМ ЧЭМК В свете возможной «деприватизации» ЧЭМК мы решили оценить вместе с экспертами и горожанами многолетний «вклад» предприятия в экологию Челябинска. 🔻Электродный цех По последним данным, ежегодно ЧЭМК выбрасывает в атмосферу 7,7 тысяч тонн загрязняющих веществ. По мнению опрошенных нами специалистов, главный «поставщик» — электродный цех комбината. «Это цех постройки 1930-х годов, он име

👍6🔥1😭1

19 Feb 2024, 16:41 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А минэкологии ссылается на отсутствие мероприятий по снижению выбросов, как на основание ареста активов чэмк:

🥴2

19 Feb 2024, 16:41 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravdaurfoPhoto

Генпрокуратура обосновала арест активов ЧЭМК работой с западными металлотрейдерами. Заводы требуют вернуть из-за отсутствия согласования приватизации правительством РФ. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО»

👍1🤔1🤯1

16 Feb 2024, 17:33 UTC≈1,190 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"Работы по снижению выбросов (на электродном производстве Челябинского электро - металлургического комбината) никакие НЕ ВЕЛИСЬ" Почему это озвучили через ПЯТЬ лет воплощения проекта Чистый воздух? И является ли это достаточным основанием для решения о переносе производства из города? Остаётся вопрос об уровне износа оборудования чэмк... источник: https://t.me/Ecoche/4305

😱6🤣2🤬2👍1💩1

13 Feb 2024, 18:10 UTC128 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @clean_air_planet

https://youtu.be/q-177DbH8IU

👍7🔥2👏1

8 Feb 2024, 09:21 UTC128 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kazantsevvnPhoto

🌺💐🌸🌹🌷🪻🎉🎊 Сегодня день рождения у нашего коллеги и единомышленника, депутата Центрального района г. Челябинска Елены Вахтиной. Желаем ей здоровья, энергии, мира и добра!!! Идти только вперед! 🤝👍🫶 💖 Особая благодарность, за отстаивание прав граждан Челябинска на благоприятную окружающую среду и сохранение Челябинского Городского бора! Команда правозащитника Фото из открытых источников #ПравозащитникКазанцев #Челяб

9

24 Jan 2024, 19:04 UTC167 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Уйдет ли Челябинск в "минус" по выбросам? https://74.ru/text/ecology/2024/01/23/73151669/

🤬5🥴3💊2🔥2👍1🤔1😁1

6 Jan 2024, 19:36 UTC177 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Минэкологии прокомментировало срывы вывоза ТКО в Челябинске. Чиновники обвинили погоду и население . Подробнее на «Правде УрФО»

🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vozduhchel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,279,237 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“За чистый воздух в Челябинске” (@vozduhchel), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vozduhchel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.