Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Правда УрФО

Channel

Правда УрФО

@pravdaurfo

On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,146subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270498380
TypeChannel
Username@pravdaurfo
Created26 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pravdaurfo

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,1445,2085,1766 August 2026 — 5,207 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,207 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,208 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,195 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,189 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,182 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,179 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,176 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,171 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,164 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,159 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,155 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,157 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,162 subscribers10 October 2026 — 5,156 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,154 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,152 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,145 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,144 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,152 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,154 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,148 subscribers8 November 2026 — 5,147 subscribers12 November 2026 — 5,146 subscribers5,1466 August 202612 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 98 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,134–5,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:065,146-1
8 Nov 2026, 11:575,147-1
4 Nov 2026, 21:585,148-6
1 Nov 2026, 12:305,154+2
29 Oct 2026, 06:015,152+8
26 Oct 2026, 08:565,144-1
23 Oct 2026, 10:365,145-7
20 Oct 2026, 07:265,152-2
14 Oct 2026, 12:395,154-2
10 Oct 2026, 21:425,156-6
4 Oct 2026, 23:005,162+5
25 Sept 2026, 11:385,157+2
17 Sept 2026, 08:175,155-4
13 Sept 2026, 01:215,159-5
9 Sept 2026, 06:415,164-7
3 Sept 2026, 15:205,171-5
30 Aug 2026, 23:545,176-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:265,179-3
25 Aug 2026, 16:045,182-7
22 Aug 2026, 12:025,189first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 68 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤730.4%
👍313.0%
🔥313.0%
🤬313.0%
😱28.70%
🤡28.70%
💩14.35%
🤨14.35%
🤮14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проблемы «Водоканала» загнали Екатеринбург и энергетиков в «коммунальную ловушку» Столица Среднего Урала столкнулась с неожиданным системным сбоем в коммунальном секторе. После восстановления холодного водоснабжения, проблемы с которым были связаны с резким ухудшением качества исходного ресурса в источниках, питающих город-миллионник, жители оказались отрезаны от ГВС. Причина не в аварии на теплотрассах, а в кризис…

12 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC114 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Коммунальное лобби» пытается вернуть себе бюджет Среднеуральска и программы модернизации и реформирования ЖКХ Бизнес, связываемый с Дмитрием Липиным, близкая к которому управляющая компания обслуживает порядка 90% многоквартирных домов Среднеуральска, оказался в эпицентре ряда крупных конфликтов. Как отмечают депутаты, структуры, близкие коммерсанту, отодвинули от ранее регулярных и финансово емких муниципальных к…

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC144 viewsread 12 August 2026

Курс валют на сегодня: 🇨🇳 CNY/RUB 12,2470 (+0,0153) 🇹🇷 TRY/RUB 1,7305 (+0,0008) 🇦🇪 AED/RUB 22,4912 (+0,0273) 🇺🇸 USD/RUB 82,6100 (+0,1100) 🇪🇺 EUR/RUB 95,3570 (+0,1350) 🛢 Urals 82,97 (-1,52) GAS 734,75 (-21,23)

11 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC391 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЧМК выставил МУП «ЧКТС» еще 32 миллиона долга. Претензии «Мечела» к структуре мэрии Челябинска достигли 670 миллионов. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC421 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тюменская область ищет еще миллиард у банков. Госдолг региона превысил 40 миллиардов. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

11 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC565 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Челябинской области прокуратура вскрыла нарушения при подготовке сетей к зиме. Надзор указал на риски некачественного теплоснабжения Октябрьского района. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

11 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC551 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Экс-глава ЮТЭК-РС вошел в руководство ЮРЭСК. Максим Медведев получил должность замгендиректора. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

11 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC556 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Челябинской области усилили контроль за ГТС на фоне аномальных ливней. Эксперты фиксируют рост уровня воды в четырех водохранилищах. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC571 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самолет «Ред Вингс» совершил вынужденную посадку в Кольцово. Причиной отклонения от маршрута называют техническую неисправность. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

11 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC561 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Конфликт на десятки миллионов в ЖК «Светлый» ТЭН переводят в апелляцию. Жалобу подал «ЭнергоРосСтрой». Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC558 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Горячая вода в домах Екатеринбурга и городов-спутников появится не раньше конца недели. Причина в низком качестве подаваемого для нагрева ресурса. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

11 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC566 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Россети Тюмень» вернули электроснабжение 70% потребителей после непогоды. Восстановительные работы продолжаются. Подробнее на «Правде УрФО» | Мы в МАКС

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @pravdaurfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Погоны и галстуки
@PogonyGalstuky · 44,768
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Новости Челябинска
@novosti_chelyab · 25,346
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Челябушка
@chelyabushka · 49,846
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Сургут | Интересное | Новости
@Surgut_life · 28,950
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
ЧП и ДТП | Регион 74 | Челябинск и область
@chp174 · 27,607
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Челябинск, который смог | URA.RU
@ACityThatSmog · 26,816
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 September 2026
Бажовский сказ
@Bajov_Skaz · 35,383
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
RED BINDER
@redbinder · 192,197
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Алексей Текслер
@alexeytexlerofficial · 27,318
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Агентство чрезвычайных новостей
@achnov · 28,154
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
Ханты, деньги, нефтевышки | URA.RU
@HantyMoney · 20,489
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
SiTV | Новости Сургута и Югры
@sitvnews · 23,210
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
74.RU| Новости Челябинска
@news_74ru · 166,245
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Регион 74 | Южный Урал и Челябинск
@nashregion74 · 29,990
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Руслан Кухарук
@kuharuk_ruslan · 26,890
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Правда УрФО” (@pravdaurfo), 5,146 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pravdaurfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.