Актуальные новости этого дня: – Андрей Бочаров принял участие в заседании президиума регполитсовета «Единой России» – Еще 26 новых водопропускных сооружений начали строить в Волгоградской области – В Волжском в дни фестиваля «Ультра 100» запретят продажу алкоголя и перекроют улицы – Интервью с легкоатлеткой Марьяной Алейник и ее тренером Олесей Кухарчук 🖥 Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX

Channel
Новости | Волгоград 24
@volgograd_24
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,106subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001401904940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @volgograd_24 |
| Created | 6 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/volgograd_24 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 7,106 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 7,109 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 7,116 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 7,122 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 7,123 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 7,123 | first reading |
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.98%
- avg views ÷ 7,106 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 212
- 86 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.74%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 86
- of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 86 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,211 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24m 51s
- Average length
- 1m 33s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 69 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 72 | 63.7% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 13.3% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 6.19% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.42% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.42% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.65% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Медведей Мишу и Гришу приютил зооцентр «Дино» в Волгоградской области Это уже взрослые ребята. Прибыли из Дагестана, там проживали в весьма стесненных условиях. Официально они были конфискованы у горе-хозяина еще три года назад, но переселить их было некуда. Сейчас в центре 11 медведей. Специалисты возводят вольер для полувольного содержания животных. Подробнее – в материале Ларисы Лазуко. 🖥 Подписаться | Перейти…
🙏2
Posted without readable text
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Быстрый мобильный интернет теперь доступен на острове Сарпинском в Волгограде Теперь местные жители и туристы могут пользоваться навигацией, банковскими сервисами, мессенджерами, видеосвязью и онлайн-картами. Запуск базовой станции на самом большом речном острове – это часть масштабной инвестиционной программы развития телеком-инфраструктуры МТС Волгоградской области. 🖥 Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX
😁2👏1🥰1
Для удобства бегунов в рамках фестиваля «Ультра 100» в Волжском перекроют местный проезд на спуске от 14-го микрорайона в СНТ «Дружба» 15 августа с 8:45 до 13:00 и с 20:00 до 22:00. 🖥Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍1
В Волжском в дни проведения фестиваля «Ультра 100» запретят продажу алкоголя С 8:00 до 23:00 ограничения будут действовать по следующим адресам: улица Набережная, № 75-7712л; проспект Ленина, № 76-86 и № 75-97; улица Энгельса, № 1; улица Сталинградская, №№ 3-9. 🖥Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX
👍1
Двоих тонущих мужчин спасли в Волгоградской области По информации ГКУ «Служба спасения», происшествие случилось сегодня днем на реке Ахтуба. Спасатели Олег Хапчаев и Николай Копылов вытащили мужчин 1993 и 1986 года рождения. Медицинская помощь им не потребовалась. 🖥 Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX
👍1
Концерт памяти Виктора Цоя пройдет в ЦПКиО Волгограда Песни группы «КИНО» споют на малой сцене 15 августа в 19:00. Среди других запланированных мероприятий на выходные: семейные соревнования, открытая тренировка, кинопоказ фильмов про Человека-Паука и дискотеки. Время и место – на нашем сайте. 🖥 Подписаться | Перейти на сайт | MAX
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @volgograd_24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@volgograd_24 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 168,885 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fedushkin_34 · 1871 postФПС ВОЛГОГРАДСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ
@fpsvo34 · 1591 postВласть 34 | Волгоград
@goduma · 721 postГлава Клетского сельского поселения Шахабов Г.Р.
@kletskaya_adm · 4411 postСОТВОРЧЕСТВО - SDC
@sodancecompany · 1681 postСталинград СВО
@StalingradSVO · 2911 post«У Алевтинушки» ⚡️
@ualevtinushki · 1141 postВолгоградский Транспорт
@vlg_transport · 3761 postVolga_puh_platok
@volga_puh_platok · 1,6621 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@volgogradnewsnet · 189 postsТележка из Парк Хауса
@park_telegka · 1722 postsФедюшкин_34🇷🇺
@fedushkin_34 · 1871 postФПС ВОЛГОГРАДСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ
@fpsvo34 · 1591 postВласть 34 | Волгоград
@goduma · 721 postЦарицын-Сталинград-Волгоград
@irina_guide_Stalingrad_1942 · 731 postГлава Клетского сельского поселения Шахабов Г.Р.
@kletskaya_adm · 4411 postСудный день Волгоград/ Правовые новости
@sdvlg · 5241 postСОТВОРЧЕСТВО - SDC
@sodancecompany · 1681 postСталинград СВО
@StalingradSVO · 2911 post«У Алевтинушки» ⚡️
@ualevtinushki · 1141 postVolga_puh_platok
@volga_puh_platok · 1,6621 postБудущее Волгограда
@volgograd2039 · 141 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@newsv1 · 133,696
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@ghestvolgograd · 103,642
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@vlgchp · 121,036
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости | Волгоград 24” (@volgograd_24), 7,106 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volgograd_24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.