The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 10 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

Channel
Crypto Trading Premium Signal
@vipcryptotradingcall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001201613466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vipcryptotradingcall |
| Description | Crypto Trading Premium Signal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 17 January 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vipcryptotradingcall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 23 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 23 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,070
- Videos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈4,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 18 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 29 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
https://discord.gg/WhHZ3KNUWt
BTCUSD: Potential for Significant Drop is Still in Play https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/bUJjFE3c-BTCUSD-Potential-for-Significant-Drop-is-Still-in-Play/ Hi Everyone! We are still waiting to see what occurs with the Blue LSMA and Red RSI in the Daily Time Frame. In the meantime, we have to wait and see what occurs in our lower time frames (90min. 3hr. and 6hr.) to get an idea if our price action continues st…
You can buy some #SXP here Buy :2825 Sell : 3000/3300/3600/3900/4400/5500/6300 Stop if 4Hr close below 2550 ️ signalexpresss ○ #signal
COIN #BAND Bollinger band breakout Buy : 29400 Sell : 31000/34000/36500/40000/44000/50000/55000/65000/open Stop trade if 1D close below 27000 ️ signalexpresss ○ #signal
To make it clear about CME futures, the orange circles show the differences between them, where we had all that action this weekend, only to go back to exactly where it close on Friday. The yellow in the middle, that red candle was the close Friday and the following green was the opening an hour ago. A 20 point difference, while BTC high/low was 4000 points. Must admit, you have to admire the controle :) https://www.…
FLM / USDT LONG : 0.145$ TARGET 1 : 0.18$ TARGET 2 : 0.22$ STOP : 0.12$ https://www.tradingview.com/x/bXT3bs9q twsiyat1 ○ #signal
Can see it already dropped a bit, when looking on the left, can see it actually did break up from that wedge but came back down too fast already. Now it's a bit too soon to say the wedge has already failed, but of course it's not great so far. Then on the right, normally i am not a great fan of these kind of lines, but all those wicks could be real. Meaning, they all bounced from that trend line, it seems. So, today…
Now got this chart in front of me again, seeing that this push is still at a resistance line, maybe still a retest? But maybe more importantly, this move up now, keeps making corrections, not real acceleration, which then gets formed into a channel like this, which is usually a matter of time until it breaks. https://www.tradingview.com/x/54GDwJkX/ botje11 ○ #analytics
️️ #QTUM/BTC ️️ Client: Binance-2 Trade Type: Regular Entry Zone: 0.0000862 - 0.0000896 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.0000938 - 20% 2) 0.0000965 - 20% 3) 0.0001010 - 20% 4) 0.0001070 - 20% 5) 0.0001108 - 20% Stop Targets: 1) 0.0000808 - 100.0% Risk level 7/10 insider_leak_of_the_day ○ #signal
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vipcryptotradingcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@botje11 · 4,3214 postsBitcoin Crypto Analytics / TradingView BTC
@BTC_Analytic · 3802 postsSignal Express
@signalexpresss · 5922 posts𝑪𝒐𝒊𝒏|𝑪𝒐𝒂𝒄𝒉|𝑺𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒔
@CoinCoachSignals · 17,5991 postEXCAVO CHANNEL
@excavochannel · 4391 postFat Pig Signals
@fatpigsignals · 42,9611 postInsider leak of the day
@Insider_leak_of_the_day · 7,3821 postPro Analysis
@ProAnalysisTrader · 11,1351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vipcryptotradingcall named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Trading Premium Signal” (@vipcryptotradingcall), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vipcryptotradingcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.