Channel
@BTC_Analytic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
380subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001279585864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BTC_Analytic |
| Description | Best Bitcoin Analytics from TradingView / XBTUSD, BTCUSD, BTCUSDT |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BTC_Analytic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 380 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 380 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I've revised my outlook on Bitcoin Dominance, anticipating a significant drop based on altcoin chart signals, Bitcoin Dominance patterns, and recent Middle East peace developments. A large Diametric pattern with wave G near completion suggests Bitcoin Dominance will decline from the highlighted red zone toward target levels, indicating a potential altcoin market revival. This aligns with bearish sentiment on Bitcoin …
Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) is at 59.7%, indicating a potential "hammer time." Staying below the thick white line favors altcoins, but if BTC.D breaks its local downtrend and flips above 59.7%, altcoins may suffer significantly. A small rise followed by a sharp downturn would present a rare, generational buying opportunity for altcoins. Monitoring this level is crucial for anticipating the next major move in the market…
❤1
Bitcoin is trading near a key resistance zone around 64,000-64,200, showing multiple rejections and weakening buyer momentum. If BTC fails to close above this level, a bearish move towards lower liquidity zones is likely. Entry is suggested between 63,600-63,800 after bearish confirmation, with a stop loss at 64,250. Take profit targets are 62,000 and 60,800. A rejection could lead to profit-taking and support testin…
I observe a sharp upward turn in BTC/USD likely triggering a subsequent rally in small altcoins, coinciding with crypto market fluctuations around the World Cup event. This pattern suggests BTC leads with a strong move that then spreads to altcoins, indicating increased market activity and potential profits. I'm monitoring this setup closely and invite others to share their insights on similar potential developments.
Bitcoin dominance excluding stablecoins (USDT.D, USDC.D) shows a completed head and shoulders pattern, signaling an imminent reversal. BTC.D is currently testing support at the 200-week SMA, aligning with the .382 Fibonacci level. For a bullish move, it must first reclaim the 9-week EMA and target the .236 Fib level. Most altcoin charts look weak, suggesting a potential significant shift if BTC dominance recovers.
Bitcoin dominance has broken the long-term uptrend established in 2023, failing repeatedly to hold above the critical 60% level and now showing lower highs and lows with increased selling pressure, signaling a medium-term downtrend. This decline suggests capital is either rotating into altcoins or exiting crypto altogether, but weak liquidity and a restrictive macro environment—with high interest rates and attractive…
❤1
BTC/USDT price action shows a cyclical pattern of impulsive rallies followed by sharp corrections, indicating institutional liquidity sweeps and distribution phases. The market operates within a range-bound "Impulse-Correction" cycle, with key resistance zones holding firm and swing lows as primary liquidity targets. Monthly analysis highlights a critical support near $62,637; a break below could trigger a drop to ~$…
❤1
I see Bitcoin Dominance's bearish Diametric pattern nearing completion, with a critical green zone poised to trigger a strong bullish wave, possibly an X wave or a new pattern onset. This move would likely pressure altcoins significantly, suggesting unfavorable conditions for them. Monitoring the green zone is crucial, as touching it could initiate a prolonged bullish phase for Bitcoin Dominance, driving its value hi…
❤1
BTCUSD is trading within a bearish structure on the 4-hour chart, respecting supply zones and staying below a descending trendline. Recent breakdowns and Breaks of Structure confirm seller control, with strong rejection near highs triggering sell-offs below key supports and liquidity sweeps below prior lows. Resistance lies at 71,495, 75,952, and 79,453; staying below these favors further downside toward a primary ta…
👎1
As a cryptanalyst with 10 years of experience, I see that if Bitcoin Dominance (BTC.D) falls below critical weekly moving averages this spring, it will trigger massive capital outflows. A dominance drop of just 3-5% can cause top altcoins to surge 2 to 3 times as fresh trading volume floods in. This scenario marks the start of a strong alt-season driven by an avalanche-like rotation from BTC into altcoins.
As a cryptanalyst with 10 years of experience, I see BTC.D is showing the expected pattern, holding crucial support around the 200-day moving average. The key focus remains whether it can stay below this 200-day line, which it has struggled to do consistently. This behavior aligns with our outlook, indicating potential shifts in market dominance if the 200-day support breaks or holds. Monitoring this level is critica…
Analyzing BTC dominance (BTC.D) and USDT dominance (USDT.D), BTC.D is nearing a trendline where a rebound is likely, typically causing BTC price to bounce. USDT.D sits at a critical level; a drop to 7.5% may offer only mild altcoin relief, while a decline to 6.6% could trigger a roughly three-week altcoin rally. True altseason requires both BTC.D and USDT.D to decline simultaneously, a synchronized move absent for a …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BTC_Analytic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,163,029 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Crypto Analytics / TradingView BTC” (@BTC_Analytic), 380 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTC_Analytic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.