Channel
@botje11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,321subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001207755945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @botje11 |
| Created | 27 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/botje11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 4,321 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 4,323 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 4,328 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 4,328 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
You would think its identical, but there are differences, so my guess is now, this looks good. just don't want to see it go below 73.5ish. I am going to increase a bit now, cause nice 7/8k profit already. what i often do now, is use several stops. 1: around 73k 2: around 70k gonna keep around 30% if these stops get hit
So far so good, up almost 6k on btc when I got in just above 67k. But, clear to see, the market doesn’t dare yet to push through because of all the uncertainties in the world. So patiently waiting before I increase. I think key level to break is around 79/80k.
So been a while since the last update. Markets been difficult lately, especially crypto. Stocks pumped and btc dumped. A lot things going one lately. I have been out for a while now, only did some small things here and there, but most were difficult to be honest. Anyway, think for now, we reached a point, you take a stance or simply stay out. You can’t use any tight stops of 10/15% or so. I think, that the markets …
As mentioned yesterdays break of the low, I am out. Have been sitting on my hands since. If this candle turns green, at least a close above 86kish, would mean a good reversal day. This one is bigger than the one 3/4 days ago, so by definition means it’s more meaningful. So waiting for that
Again, it looked good, btc went up 4k from the low. Stocks markets pumping pretty good. But once again btc shittin the bed. Important it makes a higher low here, so can’t break yesterdays lows, cause then I will close it all. So bears still in favour, think if btc can reach 95/6k, then I i thjnk 60/70% chance this short term bear is over. Doesn’t mean it will just pump up, but 60/70% chance the low is set. But not t…
Video, posted without a caption
The hurting keeps going on 😆 Just bought another small batch around 89k so I am around 30% now. But NVDIA numbers are coming in today, think the whole market is waiting on that. So a gamble here, if those are bad and stock markets dumps, I am closing it all pretty fast. So some hopium here it will be good. The setup for a low is there, but it clearly need a hand
Video, posted without a caption
So the candle close was okay, but not super convincing. Was hoping for 94k and higher. Now coming 2 days will be important. Tomorrow is allowed to be a sideways day, but close has to be above 92k, otherwise big chance bull attempt has failed. Current candle or the next has to close above 95/96k. Only way to say the this downtrend has ended, is to see 1 big green candle of 4/6k points. But that can mostly only be sai…
First good candle in a while now. Ideally closes above 94k at least, the higher the better. But if this bull attempt fails, big chance we start to go lower again. So I am prob gonna close again if this candle starts to fail. A close above 92k would be 50/50 I think, below would be in favour of bears
Market been pretty damn shitty past weeks. Got out few weeks ago already when it went below my entry. Looked like a perfect trade, went up to 116k even, but never sold cause thought would see much more. I tried 1 more attempts past weeks at 103k but took my losses after it went below 100/99k. Now, since yesterday seems btc getting dragged by weak stock market, so could be, if thos hey stable, market might go up. Now …
To give an impression, last candle was okay, shows an attempt of buyers, but doesn’t say a lot yet. Now, simply waiting for current candle, should close above 105.7 at least and preferably above 106kish. Then there might be a decent chance that bulls do a serious attempt here
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @botje11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,692 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Botje11” (@botje11), 4,321 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botje11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.