Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vegan Studies and Critical Animal Studies

@veganstudies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

536subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302774112
TypeChannel
Username@veganstudies
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/veganstudies

Growth

535536535.56 Aug 2026, 12:21 — 535 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 535 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:12 — 536 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:217 Aug 2026, 07:12
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 535–536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:12536+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:30535no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:21535first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 536 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 March 20255 August 2026)
Views total337
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC95 viewsread 6 August 2026

В новом выпуске журнала Philosophy Today вышла статья "Симона Вейль и страдания животных" исследователь:ниц Микелы Дианетти и Кьяры Ли Мандри. ________________________________ Для Вейль корень нашей моральной ответственности перед другими людьми кроется не в их способности к агентности или индивидуальности, а в их уязвимости. Чтобы признать ценность и достоинство других людей, необходимо осознать общую уязвимость, с

3 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC484 viewsread 6 August 2026

С 11 по 19 июля в Музее современного искусства «Гараж» состоится кинопрограмма «Ни одно животное не пострадало». Программа выросла из работы ридинг-группы по исследованиям животных «Нечеловеческие животные и техника» и обращается к вопросу о том, каким образом кино может свидетельствовать о присутствии нечеловеческих существ, не сводя их к символам, метафорам или фону для повествования о человеке. Собранные в програ

21 Jun 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 6 August 2026

Бесплатные онлайн-курсы по защите животных и веганству 1. Animal Advocacy Careers: Your Role in Animal Advocacy Курс посвящён тому, как построить карьеру в сфере защиты животных для людей различных профессий. Темы программы: • почему основной фокус движения должен быть на животных, эксплуатируемых в сельском хозяйстве • как можно выстроить свою карьеру, чтобы помогать животным более эффективно • на каком типе возде

14 Jan 2026, 16:09 UTC718 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @scicom_ipPhoto

Non-human studies: формы жизни и опыты родства Отношение к другим живым существам — не только теоретическая проблема, но и вопрос практик нашей повседневности. Возможность обосновать моральный статус нечеловеческих животных, выделить перспективы нашего восприятия других форм жизни, наладить способы взаимодействия с ними — те линии исследования, которые могут обсуждаться в рамках секции. Как представить другие живые

9 Jan 2026, 09:49 UTC585 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как можно преподавать о веганстве и эксплуатации животных, не вызывая у учащихся этического равнодушия? В своей статье я исследую, как ответственность и интра-акции могут открывать новые педагогические подходы к обучению о животных и веганстве. Опираясь на этику нового материализма и критическую педагогику животных, я анализирую образовательные практики, которые противостоят как моральному отчуждению учащихся, так и

15 Dec 2025, 11:26 UTC573 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @shaninkaonair

🐮Критическая педагогика животных Шанинка продолжает серию лекций, посвященных этическим вопросам агентности животных. На предстоящей лекции мы поговорим о том, возможно ли образование, которое помогает «разучиться» антропоцентризму и увидеть животных как других субъектов, а не ресурсы? Критическая педагогика животных и веганское образование предлагают новые способы говорить о правах животных через работу с телесност

13 Dec 2025, 08:54 UTC378 viewsread 6 August 2026

онлайн лекции по моральному поведению человека и животных, критической педагогике животных, антропоцентризму и межвидовой политике!

13 Dec 2025, 08:54 UTC428 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @breakingthegreatdividePhoto

⚠️ Неожиданно для нас всех, Шанинка решила организовать серию встреч, посвященных этическим вопросам агентности животных 🗓 Расписание следующее: 📌Григорий Часовских «Компаративные исследования морального поведения человека и животных», 12 декабря, 19:00 📌Яна Фишова «Критическая педагогика животных», 17 декабря, 18:00 📌Наталья Чепелева «Дилемма антропоцентризма», 20 декабря, 16:00 📌Марк Мефёд «Размышления о межв

22 Oct 2025, 13:24 UTC578 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @veganday_spbPhoto

петербург, на связи команда веган дня и мы рады наконец анонсировать уже третий по счету фестиваль, приуроченный к дню веганства в этом году вас как обычно ждут: интересные лекции, дебаты, розыгрыш, угощения, спид-дейтинг и приятное общение 📌когда? 1 ноября, с 10:00 до 22:00 📍где? кожевенная линия, 34, «нормальное место», севкабель порт, ст. м. горный институт кроме самого фестиваля мы снова отобрали пул онлайн-в

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @veganstudies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 419,070 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vegan Studies and Critical Animal Studies” (@veganstudies), 536 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veganstudies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.