Channel
@breakingthegreatdivide
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,086subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001923344446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @breakingthegreatdivide |
| Created | 3 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/breakingthegreatdivide |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 1,086 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 1,089 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 1,090 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 1,090 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,407 |
| Reactions total | 202 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
281 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 206 | 73.3% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 24.9% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня ровно 11 лет моего веганства. Традиционно в этот день я пишу пост, в котором собираю все, что было сделано мной на этом канале и за его пределами, чтобы показать самому себе, что год прошел успешно, и чтобы призывать вас начать веганить. Посты, приуроченные к 9 годам и 10 годам найдете по этим ссылкам. Посты: о критических географиях животных, телесное сострадание, о животных-компаньонах, про «Animal Capita…
❤36🔥19
Signed Марк
Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human–Animal Studies This Saturday, Shared Worlds: Concepts, Conflicts, and Connections in Human–Animal Studies brings together scholars, educators, students, and advocates from around the world to explore the ideas shaping contemporary human–animal studies and the implications those ideas have for scholarship, advocacy, public discourse, and the ways we live wi…
❤5
Signed Марк
Об искусственном мясе В работе Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame Кэри Вулф пишет: [В] рамках биополитики <...> этические и даже политические вопросы, связанные с синтетическим мясом, приобретают иной характер. С этой точки зрения синтетическое мясо <...> неразрывно связано с технологиями и механизмами, которые осуществляют все более тонкий контроль над жизнью и «заставляют жить» на са…
❤14
Signed Марк
Этого номера ГИиП'а, который мы также собирали с Маратом, еще нет в онлайн доступе, но про него уже написали. Приятно! Напишу про свой текст отдельно потом, как все выйдет. И Кон там совсем не главный.
❤1
Signed Марк
Неделя антропологических журналов: Городские исследования и практики Основатели: Факультет городского и регионального развития НИУ ВШЭ при поддержке Высшей школы урбанистики имени А.А. Высоковского Год основания: 2015 Периодичность: 4 раза в год Язык публикаций: Русский Главный редактор: Валерий Анашвили Завершает нашу тематическую неделю неантропологический журнал (хотя статьи по антропологии города там тоже регул…
❤13🔥4🙈2
Signed Марк
Этика — это спектр, или почему животные являются моральными субъектами, которых люди лишают возможности проявлять свои чувства Исследования моральных отношений среди животных создают сегодня богатую почву для переосмысления политических концепций, направляющих наше социально-правовое мышление. В статье «Animal Morality: What It Means and Why It Matters», опубликованной в журнале National Library of Medicine, биолог…
❤21🔥2
Signed Марк
chicken in the corn pinned «Веб-зин «Нечеловеческие животные и техника. Второй сезон» Сайт-сборник, на котором заверстаны и проиллюстрированы тексты и переводы от ведущих и участников ридинг-группы «Нечеловеческие животные и техника». Встречи ридинг-группы были посвящены анализу и обсуждению…»
Животные и капитал Завершающий пост-рассказ о моем участии в курсе Animals in Society далекой осенью 2024 года. Предыдущие посты можно найти тут: Дэвид Редмалм, Эрика Кудворт (+ лекция), Анн-Софи Лённгрен (+ перевод текста). Сегодня хотелось бы поделиться основными тезисами из книги Динеша Водивела Animals and Capital (оставил в комментариях). В своей работе Водивел использует марксистский концептуальный аппарат дл…
❤8🙈3🔥2
Signed Марк
Веб-зин «Нечеловеческие животные и техника. Второй сезон» Сайт-сборник, на котором заверстаны и проиллюстрированы тексты и переводы от ведущих и участников ридинг-группы «Нечеловеческие животные и техника». Встречи ридинг-группы были посвящены анализу и обсуждению программных и неочевидных текстов, связанных с положением животных в техносоциальной современности. Оглавление 1. Введение [Марк Мефёд] 2. Голубиные па…
❤23
Signed Марк
Бесплатные онлайн-курсы по защите животных и веганству 1. Animal Advocacy Careers: Your Role in Animal Advocacy Курс посвящён тому, как построить карьеру в сфере защиты животных для людей различных профессий. Темы программы: • почему основной фокус движения должен быть на животных, эксплуатируемых в сельском хозяйстве • как можно выстроить свою карьеру, чтобы помогать животным более эффективно • на каком типе возде…
❤14🔥6
Signed Марк
Спесишизм, веганство и идеология Мы все знакомы с понятием спесишизма, которое прочно закрепилось в нашем вокабуляре после публикации «Освобождения животных» Питера Сингера. Следуя за Ричардом Райдером, Сингер определяет спесишизм как «предубеждение или предвзятое отношение в пользу интересов представителей своего вида и против интересов представителей других видов». Это определение стало классическим, однако с ним …
🔥15❤14
Signed Марк
Приходите на дискуссию — участие по предварительной регистрации по ссылке в посте ниже! Формат следующий: мы с Екатериной поделимся своими мыслями в течение 20-30 минут в общей сумме, а остальное время будет отведено обсуждению между участниц:ами заранее подготовленных вопросов в мини-группах. Репосты очень приветствуются 📁
❤5
Signed Марк
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @breakingthegreatdivide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,983 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“chicken in the corn” (@breakingthegreatdivide), 1,086 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breakingthegreatdivide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.