Channel
@varbitrage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,997subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002043095167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @varbitrage |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/varbitrage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 1,997 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,998 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 1,998 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,078 |
| Reactions total | 264 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
264 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 173 | 65.5% | |
| 💩 | 54 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 6.82% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 3.79% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 3.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кардшопы: обещали "без скрытых комиссий", а по факту оказалось, что за каждую успешную транзакцию — отдельный процент сверху, о котором никто не предупреждал 🤡🤡 Схема стандартная: заманили низким процентом на пополнение, а дальше выясняется, что платишь ещё и за сам факт того, что платёж прошёл 😏 Такого говна на рынке хоть отбавляй, но мы нашли решение. LuckyCards зашли с другим заходом: $0 за отклонённые платежи, …
🔥4💩1
Помните такого Гену Огурцова? Кто не в курсе: этот фраер из Украины, который так не любит своих же соотечественников. Гена собрался "резать хохлов" и убивать "до последней свиньи", но обо всем по порядку. Известен он как Марк Пельменеджер, но такого лицемерного хуесоса мы ещё не встречали, поэтому ловите разоблачение. Марк Гена родился и вырос в Днепре, но братья-украинцы нашему персонажу наделали плохих дел и он бл…
🤡116🔥13💩5🍓4🌚2
Ушла эпоха: РОМАН СЕРГЕЕВИЧ ушёл на покой. 🤡 После воображаемой драки с сербскими бомжами гения, миллиардера и филантропа Ромаху Уховерта таки выпиздовали из конторы Ухолидз Альфалидз. Как его нахуй там держали столько лет? Официальная версия в инсте Ромы звучит как «договорились об уходе за год, и теперь буду там советчиком», но это, конечно, полная хуйня, хоть и Уховертыч в это уже, кажись, и сам поверил. Очевидно…
🤡5
Многострадальные Роялы, которых набутылили в Минске, подставили своих же вебов.🤡 Когда их задержали, Роялы обещали аффам выплатить долги — и даже сдержали обещания и частично закрыли хвосты. На этом хорошие новости закончились: Эрдема так и не выпустили из СИЗО, а в чатиках разгоняют тревожные новости. Поговаривают, что из-за изъятой базы "партнёров" теперь активно накуканивают. Уже известны случаи выхода силовиков н…
🤡4
Коллаба говна с мочей двух молодых талантов: Альберт ex exGAYming снимает порнуху откровенный контент с Василисой ex LGaming. И всё это под прикрытием ноунейм-шарашки Rave Partners. 🤡 В новом видосе дебошир Альберт, который так любит отхватывать пиздов на конфах, распаковывает Василису. Не в том смысле, в котором вы подумали, хотя кто знает, что осталось за кадром.😏🤡🤡 Мда, Василиса тоже удивляет — чем больше снимает…
🤡8🌚1
1Win заманивает школьников в казик? Дурной слушок, шо сине-белые привлекают несовершеннолетних играть в кази, витает в инфополе давно. Ещё 3 года назад казахи обвиняли овнеров Винов в привлечении пездюков, за шо, собственно, те и были задеанонены и внесены в списки Интерпола. Также на просторах необъятного интернета можно найти кучу пруфов, что на 1вин депают даже дети с мамкиных карточек — кази не вводит верификаци…
💩13🤡7
Покажите реакциями, как вы относитесь к Роману Мануйлову. В арбитраже денег нет 💵
💩33🤡16🍓6🌚4🔥1
Гуру аффилки и ментор для долбоёбов Андрей Ермолаев оказался шарлатаном — курс "Практический арбитраж" ученики разнесли в пух и прах. Чё известно: сперва Андрюха светил ебалом на подкастах и строил из себя эксперта, после чего неожиданно (нет) начал продавать обучалку с дальнейшим трудоустройством. Всё выглядело заманчиво, пока на курс не залетели первые мамонты. Сперва Ермолаев брал $1500 за обучалки, позже прайс в…
🤡6🌚2
1win продолжают скамить вебов: недавно мы писали, как сине-белые открепили хайроллеров у аффа за негативный коммент, а сегодня форсят новый кейс — вебу срезали ревшару с 50% до 15%. Без каких-либо адекватных объяснений и мотивов.🤡🤡 Причина скама среза — якобы большие затраты на хайроллеров, ведь им дают бонусы, кэшбэки и прочую хуйню, которая, как известно большинству лудиков, никогда не отыгрывается и всегда остаёт…
🤡8💩2
CatAffs, которые пропали с радаров после скандала с Глебом Гладом и обнаруженных связей с UA, внезапно активизировались и опять жидко обосрались.🤡 Масштабных скандалов и говновкидов ещё не было, но форумы лудиков завалены массовыми жалобами: Коты не платят бабки, срезают выплаты, обнуляют балансы и как только могут добивают и без того сомнительный репутасьйон.😏 С лудиками всё понятно, грех их не нагреть, но это тре…
🤡3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @varbitrage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 506,612 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В арбитраже денег нет?” (@varbitrage), 1,997 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/varbitrage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.