Meta выпустила Muse Glimmer - нейронку, способную запуститься на твоём ПК Meta выпустила Muse Glimmer — локальную нейросеть с лицензией Apache 2.0, которую можно ставить на домашний ПК и встраивать в проекты. Модель заточена под агентские сценарии: умеет работать с инструментами и локальными файлами без облака. Вывод: это удобный автономный помощник, но для запуска нужен достаточно мощный ПК с 24–32 ГБ ОЗУ. ➡️ Чита…

Channel
AFF.TOP - про арбитраж трафика и CPA рынок!
@AffDotTop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,012,313subscribers
-10,151 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002071736989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @AffDotTop @cpa_chanel |
| Description | AFF.TOP — главный портал про арбитраж трафика и CPA рынок. Новости индустрии, каталог видео, разборы партнёрок и реакции на рынок. 🌐 https://aff.top Реклама: @AFFtop_connect |
| Created | 25 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AffDotTop |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 1,012,313 | -389 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 1,012,702 | -3,586 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 1,016,288 | -1,252 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 1,017,540 | -4,254 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,021,794 | -225 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 1,022,019 | -445 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 1,022,464 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 25 November 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.427%
- avg views ÷ 1,012,313 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,330
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.052%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (25 November 2023 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,600 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2023 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Вышло десктопное приложение ChatGPT для Linux OpenAI выпустила preview десктопного ChatGPT для Linux, закрыв запрос на поддержку платформы и упростив запуск на дешёвых серверах. Уже доступны ChatGPT Work и Codex, так что инструментом можно пользоваться почти без ограничений. Вывод: OpenAI расширяет охват, а Linux становится ещё одним удобным вариантом для работы с ИИ. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/vyshl…
Маск выпустил замену Open Claw и Hermes - Grok bot SpaceXAI запустила Grok Bot — ИИ-агента, который сам выполняет рутинные задачи в вебе, генерит документы и может работать даже при выключенном ПК. Ключевой вывод: это не замена API-автоматизации, а более автономный агент с ручным подтверждением на платёжках, но для большинства задач обычных агентов пока хватает. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/mask-vypust…
Qwen выпустили tool layer Qwen выпустил tool layer для ИИ-агентов: модульный слой подключает компьютерное зрение, видео, транскрибацию и другие инструменты по отдельности. Это расширяет Qwen-Agent и помогает строить мультимодальных помощников, которые умеют работать с текстом и визуальным контекстом одновременно. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/qwen-vypustili-tool-layer 🧠 Ещё больше инсайтов → в канале A…
Claude будет по-новому метить сгенерированный контент Anthropic меняют маркировку AI-контента: вместо метаданных новые модели будут встраивать незаметные для человека, но устойчивые к правкам метки в текст, код и картинки. Это усложнит обход детекта и может ударить по сгенерированным дорам, соцсетям и вайбкод-приложениям, если платформы начнут жёстче фильтровать такой контент. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/b…
Google начал заменять кнопку поиска работой с ИИ Google тестирует замену классического поиска на нейроинструменты: генерацию картинок, вопросы по файлам и «брейншторм». Смысл простой — удержать пользователя внутри своей экосистемы и меньше делиться трафиком с внешними сайтами. Для новостников и инфосайтов это ещё один удар по органике и CTR. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/google-nachal-zameniat-knopku-po…
SpacexAI выпустила Imagine Image 2.0 xAI обновила Imagine Image 2.0: модель научилась точечно редактировать части картинки, удалять фон, умно менять размер и лучше работать с текстом. Но по бенчам она всё ещё слабее GPT-Image-2, так что как основной инструмент в продакшн её брать невыгодно. Скорее вариант для тестов и разнообразия в креативах. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/spacexai-vypustila-imagine-ima…
True Lab выпустили слот с Папичем - Papich Hunt True Lab выпустил слот Papich Hunt, пытаясь повторить хайп вокруг брендированного слота с селебой. Игра с RTP 96,18%, высокой волатильностью и win до x10 000 рассчитана на быстрый шум, а не на долгую лояльность. Для CPA и казино это ещё один повод тестировать креативы с Папичем, но успех оффера не гарантирован. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/true-lab-vypust…
Cloudflare выпустил собственный браузер для ИИ-агентов Cloudflare представила Kitesurf — безграфический облачный браузер для ИИ-агентов и автоматизации. Он заточен под парсинг HTML, скриншоты и заполнение форм, работает в изоляции на Workers и тратит в 5–7 раз меньше CPU и RAM, чем Chromium. Это даёт больше потоков на том же железе и упрощает интеграцию с Puppeteer и Playwright. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top…
👍1🔥1🤝1
Google по ошибке удалил тысячи сайтов Google массово банил сайты на Blogger из-за сбоя в автоматической модерации: система ошибочно нашла malware в контенте и снесла тысячи сайтов, часть — повторно после восстановления. Для вебмастеров вывод простой: даже трастовая платформа не защищает от ложных срабатываний, а автоматический антифрод может положить и вайт, и ферму. ➡️ Читайте на сайте: https://aff.top/blog/google…
❤1🔥1🤗1🤝1
Добро пожаловать в канал AFF.TOP! AFF.TOP — главный портал про арбитраж трафика и CPA рынок. Новости affiliate индустрии, ИИ, поисковых систем + каталог видео, разборы партнёрок и реакции на рынок. 🌐 Aff.Top
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AffDotTop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 815,852 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AFF.TOP - про арбитраж трафика и CPA рынок!” (@AffDotTop), 1,012,313 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AffDotTop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.